Is Tyson's Cosmos better than Sagan's?
>>70292089
Fuck you, NO.
absolutely not. Carl Sagan could have been the voice over for literally anything and make it better than it is now.
It was okay, but Sagan's is unbeatable.
what if someone took the new cosmos and put the voice of sagan on top?
Can bait be a question? Like, is suggesting there is a possible discussion needed the bait?
>>70292089
Dawkins said Sagan was too soft on religion so Tyson must be better
>>70292089
Tyrone is insufferable so no.
When u nut but she keep suckin
It's less affecting. However, it has much better production values and updated, more accurate information, owing to the several-decade-wide gap in science and tech development.
Watch Sagan to feel better as a human. Watch NDGT to actually learn.
