I think James Bond should be the next Bond.
LOOK AT THE TOP OF HIS HEAD
>>70098397
You mean that classic Bond hairline from the books?
Shitty, wooden, "actor".
>>70098397
>aspies that make fun of his hairline
This guy gets more pussy in a weekend then you will get in your entire life.
Enjoy making fun of every little flaw he has to make yourself feel better but at the end of the day you'll still be a loser and he'll be a 10/10 millionaire
>>70098637
At least he's not black.
i think someone with charisma should be the next Bond
a bald Bond is juist not acceptable. he has to be attractive to women.
I'm just happy i dont ever have to see Craigs fucking face again
>>70098342
I actually really liked him in The man named Uncle but he suffer from the same issue as Craig, he has anti charisma
He just wont work for Bond
>>70100286
Let's just agree that Daniel Craig wasn't playing James Bond, but a British Jason Bourne instead.
>>70098397
As someone with a full head of hair, I often wonder how ugly and insecure the people who post this are. Same with Evansposters.
>>70098691
>>70100462
its a meme you dips.
either lurk more or fuck off back to ribbit.
>>70100385
This
Dont get me wrong im a big fan of the Bourne films but Bourne is NOT Bond
>>70100286
>craig
>bond
>>70100616
It's because you're incredibly insecure. Nice backtracking though.
>>70100806
Once was enough, loser.
>>70100855
>>70100385
this.
>>70100929
I'm sorry you're intensely ugly, my teenage friend.
I'm suprised all the Craigfags havn't shown up yet
>>70100286
thank fucking god
Please let's have someone with actual charisma and no potato head
>>70098342
Me too Henry, but shitposting on /tv/ isn't going to help your cause.
>>70100956
I'm sorry that autistic people cannot detect humor. but hey ... you have great hair, thats more important
>Man from Uncle didnt poorly
>They wont make a sequel
The film was fucking great as well
>>70098691
Hello Henry :^)
>>70101066
It's fun to pretend on the internet. Were those goalposts heavy?
>>70100337
I don't see that but perhaps you do because he was forcing an American accent in Man from UNCLE. I thought it was fine though. If he played Bond he'd act more naturally considering he's British and wouldn't have to force an accent.
>>70100970
shut upyou'll summon them
>>70100898
>once
First day on /tv/ I take it?
>>70098342
>that autist
>playing Bond
hopefully not
>>70101226
You're so cool.
I have his hairline but a Lil worse
Anyone tried rogaine with results?
>>70101307
there are prescription medications you should begin taking in your early thirties to prevent/stop male pattern baldness, ask your doctor
>>70101307
buzz your hair if you have the face for it senpai
>>70098342
He fits well, and any Bond video game they might make with him would be awesome.
>>70100806
yes, he was Bond.
>>70101482
Are you sure?
>>70101510
>Cast as the fictional British secret agent James Bond in October 2005, his first film in the role, Casino Royale, was released internationally in November 2006.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Craig
>>70101641
A Walther, a tux, and a name does not, in and of itself, make one Bond.
>>70100970
>>70101482
Cavill would be a classy and muscular bond that actually looks like Bond too. Craig was just muscular, and didn't look like Bond. He acted okay as him though, but Cavill would ultimately be a better Bond overall.
>>70101794
The worst thing about these threads is its full of people who have only started following Bond in the past few years
If they had been following Bond for any amount of time they would know that when Craig was cast there was a HUGE out lash over casting not only a manlet Bond but a BLONDE one
>>70101733
well, that and a film contract.
>>70101794
He'd look better but Craig is a better overall actor. Cavill has never done anything as impressive as the poker game in Casino Royale. Incredible facial acting by him and Mads.
>>70101845
ah, I remember.
I also remember when he silenced everyone with the best film in the franchise.
>>70102036
Chicken Royale isn't top 5
Its by far the most overrated Bond movie
>>70101845
That's true, if they don't know already they should enrich their culture as to who Bond really is.
>>70101992
He hasn't done anything as impressive as that because he hasn't been in a Bond film yet.
>>70101845
These same people think a nigger could play Bond
>>70100286
Casino Royale>anything Brosnan did
>>70102138
GoldenEye is a much better Bond film the Casino Royale
Royale is the better action films sure
>>70100806
>>70102073
It's one of the most overrated films period. I didn't like it when it came out and I hate it more each time I see it
>>70102073
nope
>>70102103
>le he isn't bond
>Cast as the fictional British secret agent James Bond in October 2005, his first film in the role, Casino Royale, was released internationally in November 2006.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Craig
>>70102138
true
>>70102170
>Cast as the fictional British secret agent James Bond in October 2005, his first film in the role, Casino Royale, was released internationally in November 2006.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Craig
>>70102202
I can't help your shit taste.
>>70098342
Craig may be a bit limited, but even if he's miles better than this guy. Even in that spy movie, he was probably the worst actor, just there making a few quips every now and then.
>>70102036
>>70102073
It was so well received but it was such a dramatic departure from the slightly cheesy Bond movies that dated back not only to all the Brosnan movies but the Dalton and even the Moore movies.
"Best film in the franchise"? Sure, if you're a fucking pleb. For anybody whose seen them, the classic Connery movies will always be the best.
>>70102260
>Spamming a wikipedia link because you have only been following Bond for 5 minutes and have no actual opinion
Ok lad get rekt
"In my opinion--and I think I know as much if not more about Bond than anyone, particularly about the characters on whom Ian Fleming] told me Bond was based--Pierce Brosnan was by far the best and closest to the character."
— Christopher Lee
>>70102103
>That's true, if they don't know already they should enrich their culture as to who Bond really is.
oh I'm sure you know Bond better than Martin Campbell.
>>70102311
>Cast as the fictional British secret agent James Bond in October 2005, his first film in the role, Casino Royale, was released internationally in November 2006.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Craig
>>70102138
This is more iconic than Casino Royale:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xUhWf87-ODg
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vDGylA9Ejc8
>>70102470
>>70102479
iconic doesn't mean quality.
of course the older films are going to be more iconic.
>>70102470
Last night I... James Bond burger your sister?
Reminder that the only reason Craig's bond is so different because DaD shat the bed so hard and turned people off from the silliness.
It's all Lee Tamahori's fault.
>>70102524
Your mum likes to munch on the thick tree trunk that is my dick
>>70102479
I'm not one of those people who's going to say Goldeneye is only good because of nostalgia, but it is hard to separate how iconic the opening is when everyone here has probably played through it 1000 times on N64.
>>70102698
This
Brosnan had an underrated run as Bond
GoldenEye is an all time great Bond film
and TWNE and TND are criminally underrated
Only Bond movies worth watching:
Dr. No
From Russia With Love
Goldfinger
On Her Majesty's Secret Service
The Living Daylights
License To Kill
GoldenEye
Tomorrow Never Dies
The World is Not Enough
Casino Royale
Quantum of Solace
Skyfall
Spectre
>>70102598
Casino Royale will never be iconic, in 20 years it will be a footnote alongside Diamonds Are Forever and Octopussy
>>70102887
this shit again? If you love Bond they're all worth watching at least once
>>70098342
How is he so attractive no homo
>>70098397
It's a natural hair line not a "going bald" hairline
Do you know how hair fucking works???
>>70100385
>I've never read any of the Ian Flemming books!
>>70102598
So by your definition GoldenEye is iconic and quality, while Casino Royale only quality? And that makes it better than GoldenEye? GoldenEye will always be a better Bond film.
>>70103032
That's true
>>70103197
I have no reason to debate which is better, both of them are among the best in the entire franchise.
and considering how almost half of the franchise is shit, I'll take as many good movies as it can put out.
I'm not >>70102138 this guy btw.
I don't go into a Bond movie looking for a Bond movie because a lot of this franchise is shit (Die Another Day, A View to a Kill, Moonranker, etc.)
I don't keep an arbitrary definition of what Bond is and what a Bond film should be. In my opinion, that's the wrong way to go about it. You should look for a complelling story, interesting characters, and films with emotional weight (i.e. a Good Movie) rather than a just a James Bond movie.
That's how films get stale and furture movies become lazy rehashes and cash grabs.
>>70103521
How about the James Bond atmosphere as well as interesting characters and emotional weight. To be a good Bond movie all 3 of those are needed. Any Bond movie with these 3 things is probably a good movie as well. I think Craig could pull this off nicely.
>>70103865
cavill*
>>70102524
>>70102890
Casino Royale is the only reason we still have Bond movies after that shit heap that was Die Another Day.
>>70104096
Do you actually believe this? They'd just stop making Bond movies when Hollywood is constantly digging up lesser franchises to milk all the time.
>>70098342
[BALDS LOUDLY]
>>70102170
>GoldenEye is a much better Bond film the Casino Royale
LOL
>>70102470
LAST NIGHT I PIERCE MEAT SANDWICHED YOUR SISTER
>>70103916
>>70103865
I totally agree.
>>70104336
He's totally right though.
The franchise would be dead without Craig.
>>70102887
>no Thunderball
kys
>>70104532
>the franchise would be dead if it weren't for the movies that killed the franchise
Makes sense.
>>70102890
>Casino Royale will never be iconic
bitch please
>>70104336
I absolutely believe it. If Casino Royale was a flop after Die Another Day, that franchise would've been iced for at least a decade.
>>70102890
>Casino Royale will never be iconic
>>70102890
I don't think i'll forget Casino Royale or Skyfall tbqh.
>>70104570
Stop replying to me you mouth-breathing dipshit.
Skyfall was the highest grossing movie in the franchise. It's far from being dead.
In fact, it's more successful now than it's ever been.
>>70102890
>Casino RoyaIe will never be iconic
>>70104368
It is
>>70102890
>Casino Royale wiIl never be iconic
>>70104695
God that movie was fucking beautiful.
Probably the best looking Bond movie of all time.
Pic related was alright too, but nowhere near Skyfall.
>>70104695
fuck yes, the cinematography in both those films were amazing, and this image captures many of the better points so fucking well
>>70102890
>casino royale will never be iconic
>>70104802
>Spectre was alright
Craigfags delusions never end
>>70102890
>Casino Royale will never be iconic,
>>70104780
No, it's not. I'm glad your parents got you that N64 for Christmas though.
>>70104649
>>70104740
>>70104796
>>70104853
I really wish there was a cinegrid for this movie.
>>70104570
>killed the franchise
>Craig movies
How the fuck do you get this delusional? Skyfall is literally the biggest ever movie in the UK.
>>70104937
>its not because i can meme spout
Nice arguement
>>70104869
hello Grandpa.
>>70104635
>MGM and Sony letting a flagship like Bond rest for a decade when they're literally worthless without it
Yeah because you know they're not squeezing every ounce of juice out of their other failures.
>>70105019
>look i posted it again
>>70105022
This, the only movie that could give them a significant amount of money in the next years is Spiderman Homecoming.
They are not going to let James Bond rest now.
>>70104695
Literally Blade Runner tier kino.
>tfw Deakins is making BR2 rite nao
bellissimo
Shhhhh... Bond is sleeping.
>>70104869
Most Craigfags are too young to have even grown up with Brosnan, so if anyone says Goldeneye is good they always scream "N64 nostalgia". If they've seen anything prior to Goldeneye it was after they'd already watched Bourne-Bond and decided those are what the movies are supposed to be like.
>>70104695
>>70104802
>budget for Spectre was 50 million higher than Skyfall's
>they didn't keep the same cinematographer
Why?
>>70104869
Spectre was more than alright. A bit weightless and baggy, but other than that it's a nice midpoint between Skyfall and TWINE.
>>70102470
last night I bond burger'd your sisterand then I pierced her buns
>>70105003
>Nice arguement
You made no argument for me to counter faggot, you made two-word replys, and there's no meme in my post. I'm saying that movie is overrated and CR is accurately valued. Eat a gazillion cocks.
>>70105143
>Craigfags are now defending Spectre
Truly fucking pathetic
The film was complete dog shit
I just miss the gadgets and campiness.
Im not a fan of how SRS BSNS and gritty and realistic craigbond tried to be. I want crazy unrealistic gadgets, not a super smartphone. that shit's gay.
>>70105079
>Shhhhh... Bond is sleeping.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKbWlAAdqAo
>media gets released
>most of /tv/ makes a sensible judgement about it
>this judgement also happens to be the consensus
>reddit, facebook, gawker, and other hated inhabitants of the internet share this consensus
>/tv/ does a 180 to distinguish themselves from the crowd
Skyfall is just one example. Other flip flops include Nolan, True Detective season 2, Only God Forgives, Avatar, and my first experience with this board was these dorks defending Transformers 2 soon after its release.
>>70105143
Don't ever compare Spectre to Skyfall again, you fucking faggot. It was absolutely disgusting.
>>70105183
>GoldenEye is overrated
>Some how Casino Royale isn't
Jesus fucking christ
I swear everyone who thinks Royale is the 'GOAT' Bond film has only ever seen it once and is living of nostalgia
>>70100337
>he has anti charisma
You're either autistic or never watched Man from UNCLE.
His charisma alone saved that movie. He had more than enough. Only reason he isn't playing Bond is because of that fucking capeshit contract he's under.
>>70105143
>Spectre was more than alright.
Subtle.
>>70105080
>Most Craigfags are too young to have even grown up with Brosnan
kek
I'm your "N64 nostalgia screamer" and The World Is Not Enough is in my top five Bond films. I've seen every Bond movie. I only love Connery, Brosnan and Craig. Dalton is passable, Lazenby is unfortunate, Moore is cringe.
>>70098691
>This guy gets more pussy in a weekend then you will get in your entire life.
doesn't he spend all of his time working out and playing WoW?
>>70105279
>His charisma alone saved that movie
You are really shit posting arn't you
He was OK at best in that movie, the bloke who played the russian guy was by far the best part of the film
>>70105230
I think they should get Lana Del Ray for a Cavill Bond movie, because they fucked up hard for Spectre's theme. Radiohead would've been better for it, even though You Know my Name will always be the best Craig Bond theme.
>>70105257
The Redacted fanedit saved Spectre to be honest. Weird that he included a 19 year old Bjork song, but at least it fit the fucking title sequence. What the fuck were they thinking going with Sam Smith?
>>70105214
stop speaking with such hyperbole, it's childish and immature.
>>70105214
>complete dog shit
>absolutely disgusting
Overreact much? I bet you think TDKR is one of the worst films ever made too.
>>70105080
It had the right amount of camp and seriousness. Best script of any of Brosnan's movies, Brosnan was good, and Sean Bean was great.
>>70105250
Virtually everyone who was a bond fan hated CR and Daniel Craig as Bond when it first came out. It has nothing to do with /tv/ being contrarian.
>>70105319
>shit posting
"Yes, I'm autistic and can't see obvious things," was all you had to say.
>>70105279
He was shit. The Russian character and the girl were much better.
>>70105339
>Rotten Tomato is somehow suppose to change my opinion
Oh man i have seen the light the film is truly GOAT
>>70105320
>Cavill Bond movie
Let go.
>>70105218
>I want my bond films to be vapid and mindless entertainment with no emotional weight
Have I got the perfect movie for you!
>>70105354
Spectre is COMPLETE dog shit
It was awful
>>70105364
>ignoring the point i made so you can pretend to have a point
Nice post
>>70098342
Based Supes
>>70105396
He's the best match for Bond right now.
>>70105363
>Virtually everyone who was a bond fan hated CR and Daniel Craig as Bond when it first came out
How can you type that with a straight face?
>>70105363
bond fans are mindless baby-boomers with no taste in film. that means nothing.
>>70105391
I guess everything is either dogshit or GOAT to you huh /v/? No middle ground?
>>70105424
>Spectre is COMPLETE dog shit
It's not though. It's a pretty solid Bond film, better than at least a third of the series, same as Quantum of Solace.
>>70105474
>I guess everything is either dogshit or GOAT to you huh /v/? No middle ground?
It was shit though
Like really awful
>>70105408
DESU this is why Brosnan's movies got shittier. Invisible cars, ridiculous video game stunts, and mostly terrible plots. Too much suspension of disbelief required.
>>70105521
>QOS is better than a 1/3 of Bond iflms
Now you're just trolling
>>70105364
Thank god that talentless joke will never be Bond. At least Craig has some acting talent. Cavill has NEVER been good in anything. Only his autistic fanbase seem to get his brand of """"""acting""""""".
>>70105462
He's not a very good actor, at all. It'd be jarring to go from Craig to some talentless hunk that's just tall, dark and handsome. Hiddleston isn't how I picture Bond, but he's talented as fuck, I could be open to his take.
>>70105319
>the bloke who played the russian guy was by far the best part of the film
He was a good part, but he didn't exactly outshine the Lone Ranger or the chick. They all had good chemistry, and yes, Cavill oozed charisma. The whole trio did.
>>70105553
This.
Brosnan movies were borderline capeshit.
>>70105522
elaborate.
>>70105363
This is wrong. We hated the idea of Craig playing James "Blonde" but once we saw the movie we realized he was great.
>>70105474
>no middle ground?
It's how all of /tv/ is these days.
Either it's dogshit or a diamond. Nothing in between. It's just how /tv/ tries to be cool.
>>70105556
Not at all. Quantum of Solace is better than:
Diamonds Are Forever
Moonraker
A View to a Kill
Octopussy
The Spy Who Loved me
Die Another Day
Possibly more.
>>70105648
You must be american and 12
>>70105594
It wasn't even about the hair color as much as the lack of charisma, the Bourne fight scenes, and the lack of any sort of spy shit. They just turned him into some dumb commando brute, which nobody knew before they saw CR.
>>70105671
I'm a Londoner and I'm 28.
>>70105563
>Hiddleston isn't how I picture Bond, but he's talented as fuck, I could be open to his take.
Watch The Night Manager. Not quite action packed, but he's essentially a suave spy who fucks every woman he meets. Really good miniseries.
Disagree with you about Cavill though. There are certainly worse actors. Only time he's been legitimately bad was as Superman, and that's only because he took the Christopher Reeve impression route. Even Christian Bale magically couldn't act for shit when it came to capeshit.
>>70105648
Quantum of Solace actually gets better with repeated viewings. It's underrated, that's for sure.
>Mookraker
>Octopunny
>Die Another Day
these are the worst Bond films, so that's not really saying much.
>>70105648
I agree, it's not unwatchable and the climax is great.
The only problem is that opening chase editing.
>>70105671
>ad-hominem
>>70098342
Bond, James Bond
>>70105684
>Bourne fight scenes
Show me a Bourne movie where he chases a free runner or drives an Aston Martin.
>Criagfags
>>70105776
T. Brosnan nostalgiafag
>>70105712
I duno man, have you seen Immortals? Dude is kind of a brick on screen. I liked him in UNCLE a lot, but he's not exactly a Connery/Ford screen magnet. It's all a bit tryhard and forced.
>it's a /tv/ pretends Craig was a somehow a bad bond episode
>>70105721
>that's not really saying much
It is when everyone wants to claim there's nothing worse than QoS!
>>70105833
He was awful
Michael Fassbender
Aidan Turner
Henry Cavill
Richard armitage
Those are my choices, Huddleston needs to bulk up a bit if he wants to be a contender
>>70105873
prove it.
>>70105833
It's just contrarian minority
Brosnan nostalgiafags
>>70105816
Eh, to each his own. I liked Immortals, but considering the kind of character he was playing, a generic ancient warrior, there wasn't really much room or requirement for him to actually act.
Still a massively underrated film, and far better than that fucking Clash of the Titans
>>70105906
Look a the thread
>>70105314
not many people are willing to admit Moore was cringe.
I agree.
>>70105408
>I hate fun
enjoy your gritty grimdark jane/jamal bond I guess.
>>70105904
>Huddleston needs to bulk up a bit if he wants to be a contender
Shouldn't be too hard considering bulking up is a requirement these days. He's tall enough to play an imposing agent at the very least.
>>70105080
Bullshit.
Brosnan was my first bond, but even I know goldeneye was good and the rest are hardly up to that.
He's a good actor, but his scripts were garbage after goldeneye and insufferable
>>70105962
I dug Immortals, I'd just never list the lead actor among the reasons why.
>>70105989
Moore was the Adam West of Bonds. He never took the role seriously, the writers never took the franchise seriously.
They were essentially parodies, and Flint did that better.
>>70105408
Every time
This makes moonrakers laser scenes look almost passable
>>70106027
>>70105218
>I just miss the gadgets and campiness.
So watch Kingsman or Mission: Impossible.
>>70106061
It was all atmosphere and setpieces.
Clash didn't even have those.
Sad considering Clash had Ralph Fiennes and Liam Neeson as gods while Immortals had Twilight extras, and still made them seem more powerful.
>>70098342
Bald, James Bald
>>70106042
>Zao: Who sent you?
>Jinx: Yo' mama. And she told me to tell you she's really disappointed in you.
>>70106164
Worked for Connery.
>>70106176
>part of this exchange was considered trailer-worthy
>Criag was good because i say so and i have no evidence to back it up he JUST WAS OK
Fucking millenials
>>70106149
lol, true
That said, Luke Evans is fucking great. If he weren't gay (and hadn't starred in movies that tanked) I think he'd be on a lot more Bond lists.
>>70106212
>James Bond: You know, you're cleverer than you look.
>Q: Still, better than looking cleverer than you are.
>>70106187
Connery was charismatic
Cavill acting is not really good and in the hands of a bad director he is dull as fuck
>>70106227
>i have no evidence
Well, there's like every piece of writing out there from a critic with half a brain.
>>70106299
>Connery was charismatic
So is Cavill.
>Cavill acting is not really good and in the hands of a bad director he is dull as fuck
Give him a good one. Easy.
>>70106299
>Cavill acting is not really good
Doesn't mean he has no charisma. Just means he's not a good actor.
Keanu Reeves is the same way. Charisma bolsters acting ability; it doesn't substitute it.
>>70106304
I don't know why anti-Craig fags never seem to have rebuttal to the widespread critical acclaim other than "everyone is stupid but me!" or "le rebbit boogeyman".
>>70105149
>and then I pierced her buns
Did they swell to abnormal size?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzfNrkJ-3mE
>>70106304
>there's like every piece of writing out there from a critic with half a brain.
The same critics who hate QOS. Skyfall and Spectre?
>>70106483
>critics
>hate Skyfall
Are you from another dimension?
>>70102470
>Last night I 69'd your sister
6th bond, combo number 9. Older than half the people in this thread.
>>70105408
Holy shit that didn't age well
>>70098691
>baldlet trying to make himself feel better
lmao
>>70106127
Mission: Impossible I can see, but Kingsman drifted toward edgy too often to be any fun. Mark Millar always does that shit, and even Vaughn toning it down still isn't quite enough.
>Spectre is good
Time to stop talking about Bond
>>70107186
it was a good movie based around a bad twist.
The pacing is fantastic however for a almost 3 hour ride.
It felt like a fever dream of Bond's worst fears coming true.
>>70107186
All you needed to do to make it watchable was omit the "MI6 is gonna be shut down!" lines (as it was getting merged with C's division anyway), shave off the shitty gags, remove the bad lines, and replace the title sequence song with literally anything.
I watched the Redacted fanedit a couple of days ago and actually really liked Spectre that time. It was almost worth watching. Even the whole "Bond was Blofeld's adopted brother" shit managed to seem a little less retarded.
>>70107285
So you're saying all you need to do is change the entire film and it'll be good?
>>70098342
quite a bald statement OP
>>70107280
Beautiful shots too. I loved the funeral scene.
>>70107320
The fanedit I mentioned only had to cut eight minutes of footage. Eight minutes.
>>70107367
Look you're just lying
The film was TERRIBLE
Either you have awful taste or you're just pretending
>>70107388
Why would I lie? 8 minutes shaved off the worst shit in the movie (at least what was unavoidable, shooting the helicopter with a fucking walther, for example, was unfortunately too important) and actually made it watchable.
I'd even say it made it good. This isn't bad taste talking. I watched the theatrical Spectre once and regretted it. It was particularly disappointing because it was almost good until it farted and shat everywhere.
>>70107493
>I'd even say it made it good
Just stop, the film was awful, it wasn't bad because of 8 minutes of footage it was bad because it had awful acting, awful set pieces, awful music, awful locations and awful CGI
It was just bad
>>70107388
can you state why? you're just spouting about how it's bad and not backing up your claims.
>>70107565
You're clearly mad and have no desire to listen to anything resembling reason. Your hate is essentially fanatical as well. You hate Spectre so much you don't even want it to be good. Even if you had the power to magically turn it into a masterpiece, you'd just go on hating it instead.
I'd go so far to say you love hating it this much. In your own scathing way, you love Spectre, anon.
I just want a sequel to Man From Uncle
>>70107656
I'm being realistic and not giving the film a pass based on the fact is has le Craig in it like you clearly are
It has by far the worst Bond theme of all time, the acting was average at best
>>70107565
>it had awful acting
no
>awful set pieces
The plane was great fun.
>awful music
no
>awful locations
no
>awful CGI
no
>>70107730
>The plane was great fun.
>The music wasn't awful
>The CGI wasn't awful
You're just trolling
>>70107773
you're just picking things at random and calling them awful because you want to hate it.
>>70107894
>At random
Did we even watch the same film?
The opening theme is by far the worst Bond theme of all time and the CGI looks like its from fucking a decade ago
>>70107972
>The opening theme is by far the worst Bond theme of all time
Only thing you said that wasn't peppered with slobbering lunacy. You're somehow making people want to like Spectre with your illogical spouting.
>>70107972
>single frame showing the plane in mid-crash
You sure convinced me
>>70108085
>>70108121
>look im pretending to not notice how bad the CGI is
>>70107972
nice low-res screen shot.
>>70107972
CGI is only bad when you notice it, and I sure as hell didn't.
Spectre's problems were story related, visually it was fine.
>>70101307
rogaine only works on the crown I think
He needs to look like Bond when holding a gun in this case he does not.
>>70098342
Michael Fassbender said he wants to take him back to his soldier days.
>>70108904
Yes because he was in a movie that was not called James Bond.
>>70108904
He isn't playing Bond here.
>>70109104
fund it.
I just saw the new X-Men and his performance was fantastic.
Why don't they just make every future bond film a period piece? Why is there some unwritten rule that it has to take place in the modern day?
>>70109505
because we have about 15 films already based in those periods.
it's time to move on.
