https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRVD32rnzOw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tvq3y8BhZ2s
It's like they can't decide if they want me to hate it or not...
It will probably be a solid 6/10. Better than the last two, but still not good.
This looks like a more faithful TOS movie than any previous Trek movie and that includes the TOS movies.
It was an away mission instead of the Enterprise crashing I'd think it was an episode remake.
After that terrible first trailer, and the backlash it got from fans, they must have rethought their entire marketing campaign. The new trailer and posters and all great.
>>69973277
BUT WILL THE ALIEN BE QT WAIFU MATERIAL?
Say what you want but these posters are godtier
>>69973854
the fuck are you on about? this looks more like fucking riddick than star trek
>Two 10/10 posters and one 4/10
>One 0/10 teaser and one 7/10
Tough call.
Have we had any word on whether Stringer Bell is a Jem'Hadar?
I'd say that's a pretty weird and out of place pull but then again so is Section 31
>>69974500
The hell is Section 31, and who are those handsome gentlemen?
>>69974553
I'm not certain, but you'd better get ready for that medical conference, Julian!
>>69973277
so are alice eve and her tits not returning or what?
>>69973277
so is v'ger in it??? (because of first poster)
did sarris (idris elba) find v'ger first and got the tech upgrade to destroy the federation? is he doing it to destroy all historical records?
>>69973277
In order it's literally:
>Star Trek: TMP poster
>Superman 1978 poster
>Star Trek VI poster
Well done Hollywood originality
>>69975318
Yes to all