https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWLrpoz1YLw
thoughts?
>Ron Howard
It's an inferno isn't it? I infer.
My first thought was "wow, I can't believe they're remaking a argento flick with tom hanks" then I was reminded those da vinchi code films exist.
>adapting the tetrology in the most nonsensical order
The virus gets released into the world's water supply at the end and renders approximately one out of every three humans sterile.
It's some kind of RNA retrovirus or some bullshit so its irreversible.
Just kill half the world's population.
Start with the mudslimes
Then the niggers
Then everyone 65 and older
Then just go 50/50 on chinks and spics til you hit the magic number
Boom! Was that so hard?
They had to wait 7 years to make the same film a third time.
>>69303452
>implying the last two weren't amazing
>>69303699
>leaving the jews
good goy
>>69303395
God damn, Professor Langdon always gets the cutest companions
>>69303395
Looks watchable.
>>69303395
why inferno and not solomons key?
>>69303589
welp thanks for the spoiler text you fucking virgin
>>69303395
I like DaVinci Code and and Angels & Demons for the most part but this looks really lousy
>>69303507
kek
So what's this about? DVC was about Jesus's offspring, A&D was about Illuminati and the catholic institution, what about Inferno?
Is there a more generic director than Ron Howard? He's even more dad-core than Spielberg
>>69303452
he was supposed to be spielbergs successor but he turned out to be completely mediocre with not a single movie of note
>>69303507
haha
>>69304839
My god what a beta pleb
>>69303395
Should have been the Larry Niven novel instead
>>69303567
>tetrology
Wait, there were books after the first two? Are they any good?
>>69303395
>skipping The Lost Symbol
dropped
>>69305151
No they were even more shit.
>>69304839
shut the fuck up
he's solid and doesn't need to be more than that
pretty sure every one of his movies are at very the least watcheable, but he has a good amount of standouts too
>>69305212
Mark Romanek was supposed to direct that one.
Did anyone even watch Angels and Demons?
I heard it was nearly as bad as Da Vinci Code
>>69306649
Much more coherent than Da Vinci Code.
>>69304839
>he was supposed to be spielbergs successor
So was Zemeckis and JJ Abrams and a bunch of other random directors that Spielberg befriended and convinced to follow him
