>Star Trek 2017
>Rumours report it's set between the end of Enterprise and the beginning of The Original Series
Oh wow, lemme' guess, more Klingon phantasmagoria?!
>>68940358
gay
>>68940358
>between Enterprise and Original Series (2161-2264)
>between Star Trek VI and TNG (2293-2363)
>after Voyager and Nemesis (2379+)
Which one?
>>68940498
All of the above since it's rumored to be a seasonal anthology
Uh-oh, can't whine about crew composition or time period, what will star trekbabbies cry about now
>>68940543
>>68940543
How to accomplish such a thing? The sets would cost a fortune, making new bridges every other week.
>>68940716
From what I've heard, seasonal anthology means it changes every season, not episode
The most important question is will there be space lolis?
>>68940358
Oh please not more early Star Trek. I'd much rather see something after Voyager.
>>68943753
One season might just be that. Maybe more. Seasonal anthology, faggot. Find something else to cry about
>>68940498
15-20 years after Voyager so that DS9, TNG, and VOY cast members can cameo. More importantly you won't end up retconning anything or get forced to adhere to history that's already been written. As for subject matter I'd go for the same premise as TOS/TNG but not with an Enterprise. Save the Enterprise for a real show on a real network, not this web bullshit.
But who cares? Not like it'll be good anyway.
>Trying to squeeze more life out this barren franchise
Oh boy!
