We talk capeshit every day but not spend that time talking about Kubrick?
What is wrong with you /tv/?
>>68914993
Just wait until we are delivered unto /film/
Hiro is working day and night to provide us with the patrician refuge we need in these dire times
>BABBY'S FIRST FILM DIRECTOR
How's that highschool "film class" treating you? Did you watch 2001 yet?
>>68915206
with the kinds of posts around this board right now, we're lucky to have a kubrick thread
>>68915167
/film/ is dead, anon.
>>68915206
What directors would you rather discuss, anon?
>>68915206
Have you even seen Barry Lyndon you pleb?
>>68915206
Watch this you faggot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSgbjhuQ4Co
>>68915206
The fact that he is the most entry level director out there doesn't take anything away from his work.
>>68915252
/film/ isnt dead retard it was never born in the first place.
it was taken down because it was discovered before it was supposed to be.
>>68915206
>implying Kubrick isn't a better director than most of the directors you could name
>implying entry level is bad
>>68914993
>guys, i swear kubrick is a perfectionist genius filmmaker!
>>/kino/there is no unironic 'kino'
What's his finest? Barry Lydon orThe Killing?
>>68915530
Paths of Glory
>>68915530
2001
>>68915530
>>68915550
>>68915650
There's no wrong answerbut Clockwork is better
Eyes Wide Shut
He showed the Illuminati performing the pre rituals to ensure the 9/11 mass death ritual was successful
America to dumb to notice
Kubrick killed for it
9/11 happens with out a hitch
>>68915789
>>68915715
Patrician taste, anon.
>>68914993
>What is wrong with /tv/?
Honestly, you might criticize /mu/ for having some "hipster" tendencies and being somehow elitistic, but at least you can properly discuss music over there; the same is true for /lit/.
I /film/ ever becomes a thing, I desperately want it to be like that. There was a Terrence Malick thread the other day and it died in about six post, while capeshit threads filled with shitposting and memes last for days.I just want to talk about cinema ;-;
>>68914993
why would we discuss a pretentious hack?
Kids don't even know who that is. And I can assure it's kids on /tv/ making capeshit threads alongside shills.
>you will never watch Kubrick's AI
>you will never watch Kubrick's Napoleon movie
>>68916229
I honestly feel like it would be a very slow board, sure some people would leave the capeshit threads and visit every once in a while to shitpost or try to be part of the discussion but for the most part it would be 100 people split between a bunch of threads that go for hours at a time with no new posts.
>>68916382
Even if it becomes /ic/: Motion Photography Edition, I'll be happy. /tv/ is just awful for discussing films, yet I still come here like a meth addict almost every day.
>>68916382
Nothing wrong with a slow board.
>>68915789
Don't you sheeple faggots act like you didn't read this
>>68914993
they're all shills
>>68915206
>impossible to be right the first time
Your lack of self-confidence confirms your lack of skill.
I always laugh when people act like their so sophisticated for watching Kubrick movies.
>>68915715
Lmao no, every movie listed was better than ACO, as is Eyes Wide Shut
>>68916459
Me too, 3x3 threads are about the only place I actually get recs, and very rarely do other threads spur actual discussion. Yet here I am. I bet I spend at least 1.5 hours a day every day on /tv/
Or you can try r/movies instead. They love Kubrick.
>>68915715
>>68916229
>liking a Clockwork fuckign Orange
>patrician taste
LITERALLY go back to /r/film you top tier pleb
