Is he the only film critic worth listening to?
>>68895768
DUDE WILLIAM PETER BLATTY LMAO
>>68895768
Who dis?
>>68896022
Mark.
>>68896090
Got a last or first name?
>>68896022
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOaDpN6h6wA
>>68895768
>Muh gender politics
He's a liberal BBC cuck
no because he's not remotely worth listening to
>>68896152
Kek, besides Transformers Michael Bay is based.
>>68896179
Aside from his cuckedness his opinions on movies is usually pretty spot on.
>>68896152
Literal autist
>>68895768
I don't listen to britshits
>>68895768
>gives movies which he admits are well made but are not feminist enough bad scores
>"worth listening to"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WenltEbuenM
Based as fuck.
If he was so great, he wouldn't have stolen the money and hanged himself.
>>68896349
When did he ever do this autist.
>>68895768
> kermode is a failed director
> knows about film
if I was a failed chef would you respect my verdict on what is good food?
no you fucking wouldnt
>>68896349
Show me one review in which he does this.
>>68896419
How is he a failed director?
Film criticism was always his primary career.
Why would you listen to any? You aren't a pleb incapable of forming an opinion and need one handed to you, right? Surely when you watch a film you can form your own criticisms of it without prompting.
DANNY DYAAAAH
PIMP
>>68896478
I want to hear what a pro thinks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcHvRhq36hw&channel=UCCxKPNMqjnqbxVEt1tyDUsA
His review on Pain & Gain, dropped the bong before I even picked him up. I'll stick with gay nigger Armond.
>>68896478
>my opinion is automatically fully formed and closed to outside perspectives
your opinion is worthless if you aren't open to people smarter and more experienced than you.
post sum rants
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHeQeHstrsc
>critics
literally why would you listen to someone who knows nothing about actual filmmaking
if they haven't made a film or written a screenplay their opinion is literally worthless
>>68897134
Why?
Making films and watching them is a completely different process.
>>68897186
You don't need to know how something is made to say if you like it or not, but you do in order to critique it.
ahem
>>68897254
So you're saying that I can't dislike a movie unless I know what goes into making one?
Also pro tip: critics do know what it takes to create a film.
>>68896179
>He's a liberal BBC cuck
His Trotskyism is the source of his banter with the radio host.
>>68897278
>The labyrinthine opening shot of “Revenge of the Sith”— of Anakin and Obi-Wan giving chase to Dooku through the space vehicles on the planet of Coruscant—is a mighty and audacious gauntlet-throw, the digital equivalent of the opening shot of Orson Welles’s “Touch of Evil.”
>>68897320
He said you can like it or dislike it but you can't critique it
To have a valid critique you should know the inner workings of whatever you're analyzing. And being well read about filmmaking isn't the same as being a filmmaker either.
>>68897320
No, you can dislike it, but you can't critique properly.
>>68897588
>>68897672
I honestly don't understand what you're saying.
Only filmmakers can critique films? Do you realize how retarded that sounds?
>>68895768
I really liked him until he milked Pixar's nuts by giving Inside Out such glorious praise.
I still respect most of his opinions.
>>68897393
lmao
>Comsat Angels are better than Joy Division
Come on now Mark.
>reads an emotional listener's email
>smacks lips
why
why does he do it
My favourite critic to listen to. Even if I disagree with his reviews, which happens a lot, he articulates himself so well I keep listening.
His Ratchet and Clank review just posted might be the worst he's ever done though.
>>68898168
Best radio host on Radio 2 though. Maybe.
>>68897850
related
>>68898360
If I saw someone write that anywhere else on the internet I would assume they were trolling, but on reddit I'm fairly sure they're serious.
He's great. I love hearing him talk about horror flicks, he knows his shit.
>>68898300
Oh shit Ratchet and Clank is out? Is it any good?
>>68895768
fucking hell NEVER listen to this JEW nosed faggot as a critic
He based his review for Star Wars solely on "muh nostalgia" even certifying that it had so many flaws and is legitmately apart of the disneyati
>>68898761
>disneyati
nigga what are you smokin
>>68898807
you implying they arent controlling all these manchilfdren?
>implying
>>68898614
I haven't seen it, but the consensus seems to be that the more you like the games the more you'll like the film.
>>68898860
No because I'm not clinically delusional and paranoid.
funny how conspiracy people never seem to have any proof.
Out of the Youtube shits? Maybe. All good criticism is written.
>tfw you want to email in to the show but can never think of anything witty to say
>>68898978
He writes a column for the Guardian you fucking moron
>>68899178
most of the emails are vacuous shit filled with in-jokes anyway
Try bringing up a feminist response to a film that doesn't really necessitate it and see if you can get Mark to say it was a "well written email"
>>68896140
What is the point of simon mayo
>>68898947
its a conspiracy for a reason you absoluete fucking retard, seriously, go watch grown men fight with powersz where no one dies
>>68899178
and The Observer. And has written books about criticism.
Jonathan Ross had pretty good written reviews that he just read out via teleprompter on the BBC Film Show. Too bad he became too Hollywood to do them anymore.
>>68899381
But BvS is crap.
>>68899380
Stops Mark going off on another bullshit tangent
>>68899381
yeah: the reason is conspiracy cucks like you can't accept that consensus can exist, even when it counters your own bullshit opinion.
>OMG THEY'RE OBVIOUSLY PAID REVIEWERS REEEEE
you're literally brain damaged
Who wittertainment here?
>>68899589
Been listening for years, but I hate when they shite on about music so I've been getting fed up of the podcast lately
>>68899676
I've been listening for the last 9 months, I enjoy listening to it on long car journeys which I do most weekends.
Is it worth downloading the who back catalogue?
Ps. Hello to Jason Isaacs
>>68899832
haha xD le epic wittertainment memes
epic jason isaacs LOL *holds up spork* how u use snapchat, u just USE SNAPCHAT HAHAHAH EPIC
such a gr8 show so funny :^)
He loves everything Marvel shits out, so no.
>>68899832
Do download the back catalogue, the older episodes are great and you learn the origin of a lot of in-jokes
Love the show Steve
>>68899916
ha EPIC dilemna oops xDxD lmaoo
*wassssupppp* hahahaha lol
rofl ;)
>>68899967
>>68899894
I bet you're fun at parties
>>68899914
>He loves everything Marvel shits out
Funny, I was just listening to his Age of Ultron review earlier today. He basically said the movie was shit but still complimented Joss Whedons treatment of the characters.
Which is when I deleted the podcast from my generic fruit based phone
>>68899894
>>68899967
>le post-ironic meme-ing
kys
>>68900012
i bet you're fun on reddit
>>68900036
le generic fruit based phone
le wittertainment meme
le jason isaacs
>>68900097
Virgin
>>68900097
What's wrong fag, will Mark not read your gay emails on air?
>>68895768
He's only good when he hates a movie when he likes one I don't really give a shit.
>>68895768
God's Not Dead 2 reviewed by Mark Kermode
Wonder if he will like it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywmfW-riOKM
>>68897588
>>68897672
By that logic the only people who can critique a film are people who have made one entirely by themselves, fulfilling every role from actor to screenwriter to gaffer to fucking tea boy because they can't only truly understand the machinations of those roles until they do them themselves.
>>68895768
I like his hair and his rants. That's it.
His Pirates of the Caribbean rants are the best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYfbc1B-i4I
>>68895768
>fat
>inferior eyesight
ehhh....
>>68900146
>calling people virgins on 4chan
how new are you
Is he watchin a movie in that pic?
>>68895768
Debbie is better
>>68896152
>Breaking news on a Microsoft Word document
>>68895768
Guy is a fucking moron
>>68895768
Kermode's cool
bit of a "coffee-shop sjw", but his opinions on movies are cool
>>68901215
Reminds me of the Excel booty call. So Kermode is BET-tier stupid
I used to listen to his reviews, but since SPECTRE I've stayed away. He made it sound like the greatest Bond ever ffs.
>>68902146
Lots of critics liked SPECTRE, I remember a lot of 5/5 reviews in the papers when it came out. I imagine he'll probably become a lot softer on it as the years go by.
It's still a decent movie but nowhere near as good as most of them said, obviously.
He got a look of flak for the review when they did the Top 10 whenever it was in it though.
