ITT: fantastic scenes from sub-par movies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT7vD8uAGEQ
Link unrelated.
>complete nonsense is cool guise pew pew
>>68831822
>RotS
>sub-par
hello r e d d i t
>>68831913
It's visually impressive you try hard pleb
>>68832001
So fucking what? That alone makes a good scene?
Go watch Hack Snyder movies you fucking faggot.
The god tier music and sound effects really make the scene
>>68831913
>>68832189
The first ~52 seconds are very good. No, it's not technically impressive, but it's very well put together and thought out. The choice of music, the choice to do a long shot, the reveal as they fly over the edge of the destroyer. It devolves into shit very quickly, but the first ~52 seconds are some of the best ~52 seconds in any of the movies.
>>68831956
RoTS is sub-par. If knowing that makes me reddit, then I'm reddit. It's not even as good as RotJ. The characters are just as flat and inconsistent as in the other two prequels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z9fV557rl8
NIGGERS
>>68832189
You have no REAL appreciation of the visual medium. You're a /lit/-tier elitist who ironically reveals himself to be gigantic pleb through discounting popular and genre works from the Western canon
>>68831822
If we're talking prequels:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tMZdrUx8eM
https://youtu.be/VRCM0jWEQjQ
The prequels have tons of fantastic scenes, they're just stuck in shitty movies.
>>68831822
I like the big blue splash of an impact on the shields of the big droid ship in the back.
They always talk about having shields on various craft, but you don't see them absorb impacts until the prequels
>Traded these epic space battles to uninspired little skirmish rehashes
why disney why
>>68833847
Monehhh
The chase scene from T3
>>68833847
Because only X-wings and TIE fighters are iconic enough to include in a vapid remake for nostalgic normie casuals
>>68832189
Get over yourself. Does every scene need to be littered with meaningful layers like you, you special little onion?
You are not special, neither are your tastes which your consider elite, but you only developed these tastes because you're socially unsuccessful and looking down on movies other people watch makes you feel, in some small way, superior.
Prequel apologist is the /tv/ equivalent to Holocaust denial.
>>68834073
Both are the norm on this board.
>>68831822
>broadsides in space
fuck off
>>68834073
No need to apologize for masterpieces
>>68834073
funnily enough I do both
>>68833965
There should be a few more elements at play than just visuals if you want to have a good scene.
Calm down, you sound like you're carrying a chip on your shoulder.
>>68834305
This was done for visual and dramatic reasons. No one wants to watch a realistic space battle because it's fucking boring.
>Ah yes commander, commence fire upon this ship 200,000 miles away
>Why no, we can't see them in our window, only in this electromagnetic scanner, where they appear as a tiny red dot
>>68831822
Last two numbers of this post are many lens flares Abrams would have had in that 1:23 alone.
>>68834639
I mean you can have good looking space battles without total retardation like "space broadsides and fucking cannons with shells and shit when they're supposed to be shooting lasers".
Look at Star Trek (specifically Deep Space Nine). They had plenty of good space battles, without broadsides or space-cannons.
>>68833323
This. I watch just Attack of the Clowns just for this.
>>68831822
we're never going to get great starwars music again
FUCK YOU OP
Why did you make me REMEMBER
>>68833912
This, that car chase has been ripped off soooo many times since.
>Drop anchor
>truck flips rear end up
We could be all day with just Jackie Chan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrRFzwPE0d4
only good clip I could find of it, but this scene was great, a lot of stuff leading up to it was all over the place, but this scene was perfect
>that perfect score
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LT0IrF6dlNw
>>68834468
That's what ruins otherwise good scenes in the prequels, though: no context, gravity, or excitement due to the surrounding scenes being complete shit. A good action scenes requires context to really thrill; unfortunately many movies forget this, thus the scenes lack impact.
There's much to be appreciated in all the gratuitous over the top action scenes in shitty movies these days outside of the narrative they loosely spin. They're works of art framed in mud.
>>68831822
But this is a shit scene in a shit movie.
I fucking love this music but I can't find it anywhere. It's possible that it's stock music from somewhere but it's probably unique.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yG4DvM0wxdk
>>68832001
How?
>>68831822
The best Star Wars battle:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2WBG2rJZGW8
Every single scene with Godzilla and Muto in Godzilla
Which is like, 18% of the movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8BYyBLsCUk
>dat sound design
The scene in Titan AE where dude takes control of the ship.
I got my first speeding ticket while listening to that song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAfI1YFA1w0
>>68835721
was that really a subpar movie? I really enjoyed that and treasure planet when I was a kid(my mom also worked for NASA at the time)
>>68835714
This is exactly what I thought. The JJ Star Trek movies, for all their flaws had absolutely GOAT-tier sound design. They really managed to convey a technology that was both futuristic and still fallible, a ship that was both hyper-advanced and yet still vulnerable.To me it was reminiscent of Master and Commander, the best period naval movie ever made, which is also the best Star Trek movie never made
>>68835714
I can't get over how much I want MORE of stuff like this.
>>68835916
it's realllly easy to do sound now mate.
Unlike directing scenes or actors or CG or whatever, sounds pretty simple.
In that tools are very powerful nowadays. Both in creating sounds, and editing them in post.
It's a lot easier for a guy to make a good believable sound, than say CG.
