Theres literally nothing wrong with this movie.
except the historical accuracy
>>68727148
>look guys I know le real history william never le fucked a le princess am I smart yet hehehe~~!
Sure champ, we know you are smart and browse lots of wikipedia.
Again, nothing wrong with the movie.
>>68727087
>Directed and starring a mentally damaged alcoholic national socialist
>Nothing wrong
>>68727465
Go back to >>>/t/umblr
>>68727294
except the historical inaccuracy
>>68727087
> Mel Gibsons hilarious australian accent that was scottish occasionally
> totally ignored the Historical facts and Hollywoodized the shit out of it
>>68727491
Braveheart was better than the historically accurate borefest.
>>68727546
> totally ignored the Historical facts and Hollywoodized the shit out of it
>space after >
Nothing wrong with that. You know, I dont the see the word ''Documentary'' on that cover.
>no Sophie Marceau tits
>>68727601
well you should., because millions of plebs like you now think Braveheart is fact.
this movie is propaganda
>>68727465
Mel Gibson literally did nothing wrong.
>>68727601
I don't see it on the cover of Schindler's List either, I bet you're not so indifferent about it then.
>>68727715
>because millions of plebs like you now think Braveheart is fact
>assumptions
This guy.
I dont think Braveheart is a fact. And wether people think it is or not that doesnt alter the fact that the movie excels in what it does and that there hasnt been a movie to the date that can compare.
Its like you are one of those ADHD kids thats easily distracted. You are taking the conversation to places your brain wants it to go, since you know (like everybody and their mother) some of the Historical fallacies in the movie. Then you proceed to point it like saying ''Hey everybody I know, look at me, how fucking special I am for knowing''.
Those things are well known anon. And wether it was hollywoodized doesnt change the fact that it was a great fucking movie.
>>68727829
I wished this was bait.
>>68727465
Made at least 10 years before driving drunk and calling out the Jews
>>68727829
Dont care in the slightiest.
>>68727865
Yes, the story of William Wallace is so well known outside of this movie.
We literally watched Braveheart in history class when i was at school.
>>68727465
>Believing anything South Park says.
>>68727998
Look man, we get it, you read some info on a site or wikipedia'd the shit out of it and now think you are a 'history buff' or whatever.
Thats really not the case here.
The movie is great.
>>68727932
fuck off jew roach
>>68728043
Nice rebuttal, m8.
>>68727998
It's true, all of it
>>68728085
It is everything that can be said to you, since theres no argument whatsoever.
Nobody is arguing wether Braveheart is historically accurate or not.
>>68728156
You're arguing that everybody knows it's not accurate which is retarded as it's by far the most significant portrayal of William Wallace, likely the only exposure most people will ever get to the story.
>>68727148
Braveheart is pretty much accurate on what the filthy eternal anglo did against the proud celts of Scotland and Ireland. It's a conglomeration of centuries of history in the struggle for freedom.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umhDCtOoJZ0
>>68728274
I still dont see how this makes the movie not a Masterpiece.
Nope. Sorry.
We get it anon, you are aware of the evil Hollywood tactics to change stories to make them more appealing to the public.
But dont worry, those people can get the same exposition like you to the true history by browsing that one site and some wikipedia articles.
Then they will know the truth.
By these faggots logic, Shining is a bad film because it's not accurate to the original story.
>>68728607
>I still dont see how this makes the movie not a Masterpiece.
Every post I've made has only taken issue with that retarded statement of yours
>since you know (like everybody and their mother) some of the Historical fallacies in the movie.
This was it for reference.
>>68727998
Glad you agree that it was stupid though.
>>68728863
Shining is a bad film though.
>>68728874
>This was it for reference.
My first post i should say, that was it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHA1ufmLZQY
>>68729099
Am i supposed to believe this cuck?
Is there a more based person in Hollywood than Mel?
>Great actor and director
>Is a family guy
>Christian
>Has no regard for hoes
>Hates jews and niggers
>>68727148
>>68727294
>>68727491
>>68727601
Beady Anglo's detected
Most of the so called inaccuracies had accurate historical basis but were slightly rearranged for dramatic purposes eg.Edward ll was a cuck and a faggot or the battle of Stirling in which the English forces were routed was fought on a bridge rather than a field,you can sum up most of the other nitpicks as minor things like costumes
>>68729563
But we know anon.
Lots of people know that.
>>68728863
Exactly my point.
But people want to feel special because they think they're the only ones that know that some things are changed before they are presented to the general public.
>>68727087
>Theres literally nothing wrong with this movie.
>Irish cast retaining Irish accents for key Scottish roles.
>First girl is a typical 90s placeholder/plot device, not a character.
>English characters are so over the top villanious that the movie comes across like a spoof whenever they have lines.
>The very conventional story structure drags like fuck in the first half.
Still a fucking great movie
>>68727087
Well Mel Gibson went on a bizarre anti_Semitic rant so I'm sure /tv/ basement dwellers will praise anything he does, regardless of how good it is and whether anything is 'wrong' with it.
That being said it is a pretty cool movie
>>68727294
>battle of stirling bridge
>no bridge
SURE WHATEVER BUDDY
>>68729717
(You) know that
