Which site is right, /tv/?
Sight and sound
>>68230289
All of those I think "Yeah, alright I could see that". But fucking Metacritic, goddamn.
>>68230289
Sight & Sound > RateYourMusic > Letterboxd > Rotten Tomatoes > imdb > Metacritic
>>68230369
this, fucking boyhood is the biggest joke ever.
>>68230469
7 of its choices were made within the last 10 years.
>>68230289
>imdb sucking the dick of the same shitty films
>Letterboxd has fucking Star Wars
>Metacritic, kek
>RateYourMusic is run by edgy teenagers
>Rotten Tomatoes having surprisingly based choices compared to what a circlejerk the site is
>Sight and Sound being objectively correct
>>68230445
this
>>68230445
Eh, I'd say move Rotten Tomatoes above RateYourMusic or at least Letterboxd, if only for The Third Man.
What'd /tv/'s top 10 movies be?
>>68230289
Letterboxd surprisingly
I can't take rt that seriously with et and the third man that high and I can't take sight and sound seriously with Tokyo story at #2 and as much as I love vertigo rear window and north by Northwest are better
>>68231139
But RateYourMusic's is just Letterboxd's but without Star Wars
>>68230289
Letterbox by a mile
>>68230289
imdb: normalfags and autists
Letterboxd: "cinephiles"
Metacritic: fucking retards
RateYourMusic: edgy teenagers
Rotten Tomatoes: overly sentimental oldfags
Sight & Sound: pretentious assholes
take your pick