How would this movie be if they were women?
Better in every aspect imaginable
>>68217301
Did you watch The People vs. OJ Simpson? It would be like the farcical jury deliberations in that series.
If they wrote all the characters the same it wouldn't change at all
>>68217336
>actors and directors are irrelevant
>the only thing that matters is the script
how accurate is this?
On long car trips, my wife and I used to cast this movie with women.
it's fun, you should try it
>>68217436
No /k/ juror?
>>68217436
#7 is literally /sp/
#11 is /int/
6# is /fit/ because he is a manlet
>>68217436
7 should be /sp/
>>68217436
Juror 7 should be /sp/, he wanted to go to a baseball match and he had a good sense of humour.
Juror 6 would be more appropriate as /o/ or /diy/
>>68217507
I was surprised by this a swell.
It'd just need to be called 12 women. The anger is ingrained naturally.
>>68217514
>>68217627
>>68218179
Juror #6 cared about sports too.
#7 is literally a manchildren clown trying to make fun of everything, he didn't took seriously the whole thing: remember that he changed his vote just to leave faster... he doesn't even have his own opinion.
>12 angry men remade today
>defendant dindu nuffin
>diverse cast meaning no white guys
>jurors walk in
>AY YO HE DINDU NUFFFFFINN
>JUSS WHITEY KEEPIN DA BLACK MAN DOWN
>we find the defendant not guilty
