http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/12/media/star-wars-original-trilogy-roadshow/index.html
Wrong originals, Disney.
>the OT will be in theatres for the 6th time
>>68188482
eli is such a sperg
>tfw AotC will never be re-released in 3d like TPM
it would be an improvement honestly
>>68188629
they need to redo the cgi in the prequels
>be aware that these are the 1997 re-release versions of the original films
>the special editions
okay, that's fine as long as it's the 2004 edition
>1997
fuck no
>>68188669
I completely agree
would buy the PT box set again if they made it have TFA quality cgi.
>>68188681
Are those the ones with the dance scene or the Greedo shooting?
>>68188759
Yes.
why not just do a theater run of the Blu-Ray cuts if they aren't going to do the originals?
>The original "Star Wars" trilogy
>these are the 1997 re-release versions of the original films.
FUCK OFF
>>68188759
Yes, it's also the earliest and fucking worst version of the re-releases which means it still has the awful CGI that was made better in later versions, if you're gonna watch one of the newer editions it's the one you desperately want to avoid. I don't even think it's even available outside of VHS.
>implying you want to see this butchered interpretation of based Sheev.
>>68188669
Keep the scenes as they are but improving the CGI would be one of the best things Disney could do to Star Wars.Sadly the prequels don't sell as much as muh originals or muh Rey fanfic, so I doubt they'll even think about it
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH HELP ME LEIA
>>68188931
>implying seeing Ian McDiarmid in a star wars movie isn't an indication that it is going to suck.
>>68188931
Ian is too exposed in the 2004 version tho.
>>68188993
It'd be easy as fuck to sell.
>Introducing the Special Editions of the Prequel Trilogy!
>Now with zero Jar Jar
>Improved CGI
>Director's Cut
>Different takes used for bad line delivery
and so on and so forth
If you guys really think they're going to show matte lines and cardboard cutouts on the big screen then you are dreaming.
Most people don't even know how technically horrible Star Wars was.
>>68189117
This.
The special editions really did improve on some bad shit.
Yeah the 1997 editions were shit, but the 2004 editions are actually pretty damn good.
The blurays added in nonredeemable shit like Vader going NO NOOOO when he kills Sheev.
So what's the point showing Special Editions once again?
>1997 Special Editions
>>68189070
How the fuck do we get Disney to do this?
>>68189070
>redoing the movies that actually need to be redone
If only.
>>68189070
>>Now with zero Jar Jar
There was still a guy with a suit in ll of those scenes, taking him out would be a ton of work.
>>68189525
>in ll
*in all
>>68189070
>Different takes used for bad line delivery
You realize they used the best take they had, right?
There wasn't a 'better' take. This isn't PART TIME.
>fans make it clear they want a re-release of the theatrical versions
>OKAY HERE'S THE SHITTY REMASTERED VERSIONS YOU GUYS WANTED
This was literally the only thing I was looking forward to from Disney buying this franchise and they fucking blew it.
>>68189525
You know Jar Jar was a real person right, not a costume.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqwnWZvlt4k
>>68189525
They should do a release with just the black dude in that suit unaltered
>>68189438
Start a petition and get enough people to sign it for Disney to see potential profit.
Or get a hashtag trending.
You know, Normie shit.
>>68189500
Not redoing, refining.
>>68189525
I was just spitballing.
They could redo the mouth animation and have Ahmed Best re-record some lines.
>>68189572
Actually, some of the actorslike Haydenhave said that they gave much better performances that what George used. He apparently used really early takes.
>>68189651
>Actually, some of the actors like Hayden have said that they gave much better performances that what George used. He apparently used really early takes.
That sounds like something just to cover his ass by saying he is a much better actor and they simply didn't use his good takes in every instance.
>>68189651
>>68189714
>implying George does more than one take
>>68189714
Hayden IS a good actor though.
Ever see Vanishing on 7th Street?
>>68189737
Damn that frog.
>>68189604
>They paid someone to animate that
