So why was Legolas in The Hobbit?
You'll need to find that out for yourself.
because people like legolas maybe
>>68056277
Why weren't you?
>>68056277
> this movie is 9 hours long, we need some pointless filler
>>68056364
But he was in there since before Jackson was told to make it a trilogy
>>68056277
>what are novels
girls dont watch virgin neckbeard shit, so they threw in prettyboy Legolas to sell tickets to the female population
>>68056277
>OMG I KNOW THIS GUY!!!111 xD Its the guy from LOTR
>Omg your so nerdy LOL
>>68056445
basically this.
>>68056339
Too tall.
Was there a main character from LOTR that they didn't bring in or introduce?
Just Sam right?
>Frodo
>Gimli
>Aragorn
>Legolas
>Gandalf
>Gollum
etc
>>68056515
Yeah, I don't think he's born yet during the movies (nor is Frodo, but muh-flashback-prequel)
Arwen isn't referenced in any way, but she is a secondary character (even more so in the books).
No rohirrim appear either, nor anyone from Gondor.
>>68056515
gimli and aragorn arent even in the movies, just referenced in one scene
>>68056407
He wasn't in the novel.
>>68056645
Well, that's what he meant, they made sure they were making enough reference to LOTR events/people to create a complicity with some viewers.
>>68056612
Frodo and Sam definitely were not born if I recall.
Bilbo was 50 in the Hobbit. In fellowship, he's 100-something and Frodo isn't 50 yet. Sam is younger than Frodo I think.
>>68056277
because his mother loved him
>>68056612
Well, none of them are main characters... MAYBE Theoden?
Ok, Sam and Theoden. Boromir is another but he did die, so maybe they assume he didn't have enough of a fanbase.
and my axe!
>>68056277
to jump on falling CGI stone stairs
>>68056277
Geralt?