[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Look who is back at rottentomatoes.com! It's the king
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 73
Thread images: 12
File: 1.jpg.png (188 KB, 1259x542) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg.png
188 KB, 1259x542
Look who is back at rottentomatoes.com!
It's the king of /t/v/irgins!

I'm glad he is back, his banning from the site was unfair tbqh senpai baka
>>
>>67866314
>great eye for scale
>robots change size from scene to scene
Nigga...
>>
No 100% movies from now on
>>
hey welcome back
>>
>>67866314
What does that have to do with /tv/ though?
>>
>>67866397
>What does that have to do with /tv/ though?

Armond White is the only /tv/ approved critic
>>
>>67866442
>/tv/
>approves a nigger

Nah, I think you've been mislead, my senpai.
>>
>No 100% movies from now on

He, Chis-chan's estranged brother and other 2 guys where the only critics to dislike Toy Story 3
>>
>>67866611
>being this fucking new
Stay in your batman threads and then leave once you're finished your vacation from /v/
>>
File: 14558.jpg (123 KB, 664x441) Image search: [Google]
14558.jpg
123 KB, 664x441
>>67866636
>talking about new

I didnt think it would be THAT easy.
>>
http://www.out.com/armond-white/2016/3/24/sexiest-batman-and-superman-imaginable

friendly reminder that this guy is just another critic writing puff pieces shilling for films he decided would be great before even seeing them.
>>
>>67866611
get a load of this newfag
>>
>>67866350
Get back to >>>/imdbgoofs/ pleb
>>
>>67866611
/b/ leaking again showing how new they're

GET OUT.
>>
>>67866711

>pretending to be retarded

:^)
>>
>>67866611
Everyone please take note of this newfag
>>
>>67866442
*but only in a meme way, because his reviews are contrarian for the sake of being contrarian so it's fun to pretend that they have value
>>
>>67866611
Newfag detected.
>>
>>67866611
how new are you
>>
>>67866314
Did he singlehandedly rasie BvS score by 5%?
>>
>>67866442
That makes no sense. He likes all the trash movies /tv/ hates and uses an an insult when people are too "dumb" to get "higher art" movies
>>
File: 1447715315909.jpg (74 KB, 500x356) Image search: [Google]
1447715315909.jpg
74 KB, 500x356
>>67866314
>>
>>67866943
no they're not. you may not... well you clearly don't, understand their meaning, but that is not a reason to label them contrarian. sometimes morons like you are confronted with their own inadequacy so they label anything that threatens them as stupid. This is an example in action.
>>
>>67866920
Look at all the sweet (you)s though. At least Im still pretending, but look at all these actual retards around here.
>>
>>67866611
>being unironically racist
>>>/pol/
>>
File: sigh.png (137 KB, 904x864) Image search: [Google]
sigh.png
137 KB, 904x864
>>67866314
>Armond White
>is black
>>
>>67866611

Mr. White is pretty based. Read his reviews, he is savage and almost 100% right on the subject.
>>
>>67867040
I hate this.
>>
>>67866832
>>67866918
>>67866927
>>67866977
>>67866995
>>67867083

Keep em coming.
>>
>>67867148
Agreed
>>
File: 133645492791.jpg (9 KB, 250x232) Image search: [Google]
133645492791.jpg
9 KB, 250x232
>“No!” is the first word spoken in There Will Be Blood, and it should be the last said in response to Paul Thomas Anderson’s latest pretend epic.
>>
Based Arnold
>>
>>67867055
Oh please, he compared Jack and Jill to Ancient Greek theatre. Which is hilarious to read, but also incredibly retarded.
>>
>>67867121
Even his name is contratrian.
>>
Why didn't they use his Out.com review of BvS?
>>
>>67866611
Waste of triple doubles faggot nufag
>>
>>67867446
>Why didn't they use his Out.com review of BvS?

Because that was not a real movie review it was a gay review about the actors appearance
>>
>>67866611
fuck off back to /b/ and then kill yourself
>>
>>67866442
>say whatever the opposite of the popular consensus is
>get dick sucked by /tv/
>>
>>67867331
>i don't understand allusion or metaphor
>better call it 'retarded'
>>
>>67867684
>>say whatever the opposite of the popular consensus is
>>get dick sucked by /tv/

You have no idea what you are talking about, /tv/ is 90% chapeshit m8.
>>
File: 1437510432806.png (206 KB, 1000x560) Image search: [Google]
1437510432806.png
206 KB, 1000x560
>>67867040
>>
>>67867040
>>67867813
hella f*cking epic!
>>
>>67867070
>i-it was j-just a joke guys, I'm really one of you fellas, honest!

Now's a good time to stick a fork in an outlet you worthless sack of shit.
>>
>>67867331
Out of interest, have you ever actually read any ancient Greek comedy?
>>
>>67867848
>>>/v/
>>
>>67867634
That's my problem with Armond. He shouldn't treat The National Review as his "real" paper and then gay it up and pander to the Out audience. It's completely disingenuous.
>>
>>67867915
>h-he got me, b-better throw an insult to feel better.

I'd rather you respond to the previous post. This is the most (you)s I've ever had.
>>
File: 1451435478953.png (52 KB, 844x862) Image search: [Google]
1451435478953.png
52 KB, 844x862
>>67867223
>>
>>67867729
Shitty Adam Sandler comedies and Greek theatre could not possibly be more dissimilar. I get that Armond's criticism is just an intellectual exercise in defending filth and railing against excellence for the sake of entertaining astute readers, but the value of his reviews is limited to the entertainment provided by them. They're intellectual absurdist humor, not meant to be taken seriously.
>>
>>67868134
>wow guise I'm so gud a merely pretending to be an idiot!
>u shuld be jelly @ how much cum i guzzle XD

>>>/r/eddit
>>
File: tmp_24404-D0xku2d982025870.jpg (40 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]
tmp_24404-D0xku2d982025870.jpg
40 KB, 600x450
>>67868134
>doing this much damage control

I'm actually starting to feel bad for this guy.
>>
>>67868246
>>67868285

The previous post, please. Its not that much to ask.
>>
>>67866314
Just read his National Review article for BvS. I always discard any critic that throws out the phrase "post-9/11" multiple times and Armond is no different.
>>
File: armond-white[1].jpg (38 KB, 400x372) Image search: [Google]
armond-white[1].jpg
38 KB, 400x372
Thank you, king of /tv/
>>
File: image.png (255 KB, 770x711) Image search: [Google]
image.png
255 KB, 770x711
Guys.. I'm fucking scared.

I'm fucking nauseous. I stayed up all night because how worried I was. Suicide Squad is our last shot to prove that the DCEU is a worthwhile franchise. If Suicide Squad is reviewed poorly.. then it's fucking over, DCbros.

I wanted this to get a 98%
on Rotten Tomatoes. I wanted this to FORCE marveldrones to see the movie. I wanted them to cry as they're forced to withdraw $15 to watch it in IMAX 3D.

But it's not going to be to be do well. It's getting bad buzz, and was revealed to be a desperate, GOTG cash in. Another blunder in a long line of blunders. We fucking lost, DCbros..

How do I calm down? How do I ease myself and face the inevitable that Suicide Squad is a blunder?
>>
>>67868460
false flagger detected
>>
>>67868484
no shit
>>
>>67866611
stop posting
>>
>>67868506
if you promise you wont
>>
BASED WRECKER OF CONSENSUS IS BACK
>>
>Armond White
>is actually black
What kind of name is Armond anyways
>>
>>67870303
The effete kind. Go on. Look it up.
>>
>>67870303
it is a joke we are all playing, its actually gregg "almond" allman
>>
How to be armond white

1. Flip a coin to decide whether to trash or praise a film. This makes you unpredictable

2. When defending a bad film or criticising a masterpiece, pick out one specific artistic element and focus on how good that aspect of it is.

3. diss liberals. since he is black this in principle makes him an iconoclast

4. have a thesaurus and latin phrases dictionary handy
>>
>>67868460
take it easy
>>
>>67866611
He's an honorary white, and I'll fucking slaughter you if you ever besmirch King Armond again, you dirty pleb.
>>
>>67870236
>WRECKER OF CONSENSUS

he's not strictly a contrarian. He's picks stance arbitrarily as an exercise in film critique.
>>
>>67870815
You don't have to preach. I simply admire his decade-long effect on autists when the rating of their pet flick fails to reach a rounded number.
>>
File: 1458644830172.jpg (48 KB, 558x480) Image search: [Google]
1458644830172.jpg
48 KB, 558x480
>>67866611
Wow, really? Really?
>>
I like him just because he sees anime as the manchildren trash it is.
>>
>>67866611
You have to go back.
>>
>>67868460
>it's not going to be to be do well
Thread replies: 73
Thread images: 12

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.