[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
What are some shit posters?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 5
File: hero-awfulposters.jpg (48 KB, 587x330) Image search: [Google]
hero-awfulposters.jpg
48 KB, 587x330
What are some shit posters?
>>
>>67704096
Australia
>>
>>67704114
upvoted
>>
all of them
>>
>>67704114
kek
>>
File: lolita.jpg (723 KB, 938x1400) Image search: [Google]
lolita.jpg
723 KB, 938x1400
>Stanley Kubrick is about to make you his bitch
>>suck it down
>>
File: TFA-poster.jpg (286 KB, 1024x1536) Image search: [Google]
TFA-poster.jpg
286 KB, 1024x1536
>>67704096
why are fan posters so much better than the official ones?
>>
>>67704122
Thanks anon have some karma
>>
>>67704161
Who the fuck would buy this poster and put it up their wall?
>>
File: blueandorange.png (1 MB, 470x1383) Image search: [Google]
blueandorange.png
1 MB, 470x1383
At least those are creative
>>
>>67704179
haha you can't even upvote
what a fucking loser
>>
>>67704189
someone like nicholas winding refn
>>
>>67704189
me
>>
>>67704161
>come to see a movie about a guy shagging an underage but you gotta be over 18.

kek nah joke. this movie was shit compared to the remake due to Kubrick not even being allowed to show them kissing.. WHY make this film if they weren't even allowed to hug? For those who hadn't read the book must have been like "This guy is innocent cos he never touched her sexually at all!"
>>
>>67704189
gtfo normie
>>
File: dredd.png (301 KB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]
dredd.png
301 KB, 500x375
>>67704193
>talking shit about the love guru
>>
>>67704259
I've never actually seen it, its really that watered down compared to the book?
>>
>>67704310
oh yes it is. nothing sexual at all happens in it. is a great film tho with dark comedy and Peter Sellers is awesome in it so do give it a watch
Thread replies: 18
Thread images: 5

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.