>Modern movies are mastered in 2K
>Then uprezzed to 4K
>Retards actually buy these
Why?
28 days later was shot on mini dv, but they still released a blue ray.
>>67575212
>the best movie on this or any other planet
>not even among the best work of either that year or from that director
>>67575212
what's wrong with that
you just double the pixels, it's nothing complex
Same thing with early blurays and HD content. Upscaled DVD like it was cool.
>>67577208
>not appreciating the golden globe winner for best comedy
>>67575212
they are literally cucks
With QUALITY movies like Smurfs 2 and Fantastic Four 2015 as launch titles I have no doubt 4K will be a complete success anon.
It's literally's every patrician dream to have such Kino available at film masters resolution
>>67575212
>>Modern movies are mastered in 2K
This isn't true though
Criterion Collection has a lot of movies mastered in 4K
>>67577617
It is though.
Outside of kpop, there's no native 4k content.
>>67577709
#1 DVD release this week is 4k
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1951266/technical?ref_=tt_ql_dt_7
Early DVDs and BluRays were probably shite quality as well, but going forward everything will be mastered with 4K in mind
>>67577617
Idiot.
I mean, are you poor or something?
How do you know they didn't shoot in 4k and are using the RAW files for this 4k mastering?
>>67577825
>Negative Format Codex ARRIRAW (2.8K)
>Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format)
This means the movie was filmed at 2.8k and upscaled to 4k, yo.
>>67577895
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3659388/technical?ref_=tt_ql_dt_7
Says so right here that it was mastered at 2k.
>>67577837
Most movies from now on will be 4k and anything that has footage worth selling will be remastered soon.
>>67577963
No it doesn't, the negative is always lower. This is used in case the film needs to be downscaled.
>>67578049
>the film is always lower resolution
>they use this to downscale
...
