Which side looks better, /tv/?
r
>>67483113
left
>>67483113
obviously the original on the left
>>67483113
left, right looks like it has a filter and his face looks plastic
>>67483113
Left is all grainy, right looks like real life.
Left... I can see through the compression. Right is unrealistic painting over. Bad retouching job.
They're exactly the same. You can't trick me with your optical illusions
>>67483113
Left looks like a film, right looks like a Ken doll.
>>67483113
Left looks like a grainy video, right looks like some weird anime photoshop of Arnie.
>people actually enjoy film grain
Right is objectively superior
>>67483592
Cause of muh aesthetic
>>67483113
I actually have the bluray of the one on the right. That opening scene is really the only part that looks atrocious. The rest of the movie looks perfectly fine
>>67483113
The left. There is some uncanny valley kind of shit going on in the second one.
>>67483113
Right looks better in motion
>>67483113
Left. Right is laminate face
>people actually like their movies to look like a photoshop special effect slathered onto every scene
both look "enhanced"
Predator deserves a 4k remaster. Fucking Showgirls has a better looking blu ray than this.
Besides the pixel line border this release looks damn fine.
>>67484712
>>67484762