Spielberg shot Duel in 13 days. Are there more decent films made in two weeks or less?
i hear braveheart only took 2 weeks to film
>>67477510
Your mum's porno
AH FUCK I just read an article yesterday when I was on the poop machine that involved a movie being shot in 2 weeks by some dude who suffered a nervous breakdown right before filming.
I wish my memory wasn't so terrible
>>67477676
That's not true, it took them 16 days just to find the wet spot.
>>67477547
I wouldn't think that likely given the scope of it, got a source?
Some of the saw movies I think
>>67477510
Bad Lieutenant was shot over 8 days or so, i think
the blair witch project took 80 minutes to film because its real footage
They slapped together the planet earth series in a week.
Decent B-Western film directed by Gerd Oswald. Many B-pictures were made on short schedules, when studios still made B-pictures.
>That was one of my six or seven day epics… The line producer, John Brett, said, ‘You are only allowed so much money for this picture and tomorrow we’ve got a big lynch scene. We’re supposed to have 50 extras, and I can only give you 12. That’s all — we just don’t have any more money.’ So by necessity I was forced to do certain set-ups that I normally wouldn’t have done. I filled half the screen with the profile of one man, then filled the background. I created a mob scene with just 12 people. The film got tremendous reviews in New York; they praised the inventiveness of the shots — truth was I was forced into it.
iirc Knight of Cups took a fortnight
>>67477510
shot in 10 days
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLUmwkqie2g
pure kino
>>67479019
Thanks for this!
Does anyone know how long it took to film Repulsion and/or Knife in the Water?
>>67479268
kek
>>67477547
no it didnt, the battle scenes alone took 3 weeks.
