>Critics didn't like BvS because it was too mature and serious! Critics think that superhero movies need to be lighthearted quipfests!
Do you morons realize how fucking idiotic of an excuse this is?
>b-but muh marvel
Marvel paid off the reviewers
The plot was messy. Any person above OP's IQ could see that.
>29%
>2016
>still caring about superhero flicks
you all had it coming
pathetic
>>67442284
>Stop talking about piss jars!
kek
>>67442312
Sure they did.
>>67442127
Nolan is a competent director
Zack Snyder is talentless hack
>>67442127
>Critics didn't like BvS because it was too mature and serious! Critics think that superhero movies need to be lighthearted quipfests
You're the only person saying this. One movie is very well done and one is shit. Period. Cry somewhere else.
>>67442462
Did you stop reading after the greentext and also not look at the image?
>The Dark Knight
>serious
why so serious lmao hehehehehehehe
Seriously the so called moral dilemmas of that film are impressive if you're a 14 year old boy, everyone else can see the ridiculousness of it all. Not to mention the awkward, typical exposition-filled dialogue that Nolan loves to do. It's especially awkward when he tries to make the characters say lines like "the night is darkest just before the dawn". It sounds cool but if you stop to think about them even for a little bit you realize they're hollow and mean nothing. It's full of ridiculous, trite dialogue.
>>67442312
Uh huh. I bet Disney distributed the money by UFO and then laid down some chemtrails to make sure they did what they were told.
>>67442284
Batfleck WAS good though, the rest is shit.
Easy answer: because Nolan is competent while Synder is not, even with a $250 million budget under his belt.
>>67442614
yeah sure whatever good job missing the point tho
