BvS seems like shit but I'm starting to believe in the paid reviews theory
If reviews are paid why is BvS Rotten dummy?
>taking a picture of your screen instead of a screenshot
>>67330815
I don't know, maybe different media companies owning different reviewers outlets.
I know critics gave Spy and Fury Road like 95, but Ultron was on the level of Green Lantern, idg
>>67330868
I took it to send a friend on whatsapp and didn't feel like using my phone browser. Also I'm drunk
>>67330815
i mean if age of ultron is 75 and batman is around 30 i can only imagine Snyder did a remake of The Pest
>>67330981
RT is owned by fucking Warner, the company making the movie.
>>67331025
You and your friend are both fucking faggots.
>>67331516
RT doesn't review them
>>67330776
These losers are just jealous you have a friend and are drunk. I'm also drunk and me and my friend were just talking about this exact subject with this exact movie. Cosmic.
WB owns RT so realistically they are the ones who should be paying out the most
>>67333522
but warner doesn't own as much media outlets
and RT doesn't review movies, it aggregates reviews
>>67333493
i just dont get it. 75%
>>67331025
Is your friend cute?
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/spy_2015/
Critics have shit taste and let biases get in the way of their scores, and if you let them dictate not only what you watch but what you like you're a fucking moron.
>>67334910
I'm just astonished by the Ant-Man and Ultron reviews. These movies are genuinely bad. I can totally believe BvS is as bad as they say, but I find it suspicious why they feel they can be honest with this one.
(i mean, Road Fury had feminist vibe surrounding it and the "practical effects" PR so the disciplined media class feels they need to appreciate it and signal each other of their education, and Spy is "fat woman" so can't dislike that)
>>67331025
lel random drunk excuse, look at me im so drunk and random lulz xd
there were fuckloads of fake twitter profiles saying the same sentence about the trailers a few weeks ago
it's reasonable to be suspicious (although BvS does seem bad)
>>67334016
>Time Warner
>not owning media outlets
Are you actually retarded?
>>67330776
WARNER BROS owns Rotten Tomatoes you fucking idiots.
>> Muh conspiracy theories.
>>67331025
>DCucks literally drinking the pain away.
JUST tier
>>67335235
but Disney owns the critics, not WB.
>>67335224
>as much
>>67335235
RT doesnt review them (why do dummies think this is a smart thing to say to the point they said it 4 times?)
>>67334910
>R-REVIEWS D-DON'T MATTER
>>67335330
OP here, Warner's fury road got a absurdly high score so that's not necessarily it. BvS looks genuinely bad, but i dont understand things like Ultron
>>67330815
Because Disney is more Jewish than Warner Bros.
Just look at all the Marvel and The Force Awakens reveiws.
>>67335235
so? rotten tomatoes doesn't review the movies moron
>>67335336
>RT doesn't review them
You think the synopsis writes itself?
>>67335396
yes nice save there
>>67331025
>Also I'm drunk
Yes. We can see why.
>>67331025
>drunk on a Tuesday night browsing 4chan
die
>>67335381
Ultron had Star Wars Prequel syndrome helping it.
I understand people hate Whedons quirkshit because they're used to it but it worked well the first time for the general viewing public.
>>67335311
mate i literally have zero love for dc and your company fanboy shit is dumb, i had just come back from a bar
>>67335381
because they might want to work with Miller in the future so they don't want his rep to be tarnished. Snyder otoh, they don't really care about him.
>>67335427
>>67335471
do you people never celebrate other people's birthday or go to happy hours ever?
Nah, Rotten Tomatoes is partly owned by Warner Brothers, they could have made it fresh. Stop being a faggot
>>67335533
maybe but that's just speculation considering snyder worked with them a lot
>>67330981
>Ultron was on the level of Green Lantern
>All of the Actors have synergy on Ultron
>Consistent Story
>Source Material fairly represented
vs
>Actors just cashing one in
>Rewritten into hell
>basically does the same thing as Fantastic 4 did with galactus making him a weird dark matter floaty shit villain
They are nothing alike..
>>67335656
your kind is just as bad as people who defend Man of Steel (ok, maybe not the same because those people pretend that shit is deep)
>>67335514
Yea that's why i make thread right after BvS. Kill yourself faggot
>>67330981
Uhhhhhhh, Ultron was bad but it wasn't fucking Green Lantern bad.
Green Lantern looked like a SyFy original, at least Age of Stringtron had production value and a semi-cohesive plot.
>>67335764
yes because only now in these recent bvs RT threads i found out Ultron has a score higher han Irreversible or Die Hard 3
>>67335875
>Ultron has a score higher han Irreversible or Die Hard 3
wtf fuck irreversible but higher than best die hard?
>>67335384
DCucks are literally this mad holy shit
if Disney really pays off all DC movies to get bad reviews, why is the Nolan trilogy critically acclaimed EVERYWHERE? just accept that your precious flicks that aren't Batman are very shit.
>>67330776
>bitter DCucks on damage control start posting their tinfoil hate theories
ALL DEEZ CRYING BABBIES
>>67335875
>>67335833
>>67335908
The only think wrong with Age of Ultron was that is wasnt as good as Avengers 1.
Other than that it was an above average movie.
lol @ DC fags trying to make it seem it was a bad movie. You want bad movie , go see MOS.
No foul play here.
>>67335965
op here i'm glad BvS gets the grade it deserves (the second trailer really showed it was horrible) and critics aren't fanboys at imdb
but i'm genuinely curious about the culture critics share that ultron, spy, fury road or antman are great films
>>67331025
YOU AND YOUR FRIEND ARE DEAD
>>67336107
>>67336062
i didnt know pr companies had perfected the fake profile thing. Like, the photos seem genuine, do they steal it from real profiles?
>>67336060
marvelcucks on maximum damage control
>>67336083
Fury Road is literally a god tier movie, get fucked.
the other 3 are perfectly fine to watch, thus they all deserve their 70% rating
>>67336175
They learned from the Israelis and Palestine.
>>67336137
fucking kek
>>67336192
>DCucks trying to pseudo turn the tables
LMAO
>>67336083
They probably recognize that Marvel doesn't try to be what it's not.
Warner went really all out on the "greatest Cape of all tiem".
Not to mention the movie itself is likely rife with producer meddling like every other project they do.
>>67336175
Hire another company for brand new stock photos.
>that delusional DCuck damage control
>>67336207
spy is 94%
fury road is a pretty average action schlock with mediocre story and worse storytelling, If it wasn't its special effects, Ultron would be better
>>67336062
>>67336107
>>67336172
>some shitty forced meme is why this movie is dying in the reviews
nice try senpai. maybe it's just shit?
>>67336192
>Maximum Damage control
why bother, the movie is crashing and burning fine on its own
>>67335569
they have no social life or friends to drink with. They probably recoil in disgust at the mere smell of alcohol.
>>67336315
have you actually seen Spy?
I'm not a fan of fatty McGoo but even I admit she gets a laugh out of me
>>67336060
Ultron was an absolute dogshit movie, but it's slightly less dogshitty than BvS.
>>67336250
That's not really a good reasoning, The Mask 2 doesn't become a good movie just because it didn't try to be La Dolce Vita
(although i'm sure BvS comes off even worse for how it tries to be super serious)
>>67336342
It isn't a meme, is some sort of weird campaign that always post something different and bad about BvS through millions of accounts. It's happening Twitter, Facebook and Tumblr.
Now... i don't believe that Disney is doing it. This is a very low level stuff. This is probably something out of a loaded Marvelfan.
>>67336481
yeah most of these sort of twitter spam seems too cheap and dumb to not be amateur in origin
>>67330776
it's actually more like gamergate
blowbangs with scarlett johanson and olsen
>>67336422
she's definitly not terrible, but there was an certain "hm yes female lead, a fat one, i must be progressive here" thing going on similar to fury road
I assume every good review for a big Corp product is a fake review
>>67336921
yes but this is also "corporate brand meets corporate brand: dawn of franchise" and critics managed to call a spade a spade in this case, it really looks like a bad movie
>>67335330
