Discuss Twilight without discussing about the main charactersI love its scenery and lore
>>67229364
I want to fuck Ashley Greene in this, she looks so cute with short hair.
Robert Pattinson shits on this movie whenever he can but where would his career be now if he hadn't taken it?
>>67229364
Lore was good, but some of the characters and the sparkling vampires was a bit lame.
I did like the idea of the Vamps having one special ability amongst them. I thought that was pretty cool.
>>67229435
she' really pretty
>>67229436
In the exact same place I imagine.
The fuck has he done since?
Daily reminder
Werewolves=Vampires (depends on their ability) but generally
Werewolves>Vampires>Wolves
>>67229494
He did a damn good flick with Dane Dehaan about James Dean.
He's pretty much stuck with indie films, a bit like Daniel Radcliffe and Classic Dano.
>>67229364
Lore? Mary sue vampires that according to the author could survive a modern military assault and for some resonance don't rule the world?
Shit at least Blade and Interview vamps had serious weaknesses that prevented them from out right ruling in the open as gods.
>>67229435
objective truth.
pattinson is honestly a pretty good actor and it's a shame that he's forever tarred with the twilight brush
kstew is pretty sexy
that's all the opinion i have
>>67229364
>Discuss Twilight without discussing about the main characters
k-kstew thread?
>>67229548
Did the Twilight vampires even had any weakness? they could even read human minds.
>>67229613
They were kind of the perfect couple even if it was all for publicity. Imagine if Rob had been in all the boyfriend roles alongside kstew to this day instead of beta boy Eisenburg.
http://hollywoodlife.com/2012/09/19/kristen-stewart-interview-robert-pattinson-sex-lick-armpits/
>>67229711
LUCKY BASTARD
>>67229534
Classic strategy.
>>67229682
No they had no weaknesses especially as a group.
Which really makes you wonder why they would bother to hide at all.
>>67229613
He'll be fine boss. He's still got a career.unlike JUST
>>67229711
Beta boys can be based at times though, mon amis.
It's beta KEKS without a shred of dignity that you've got worry about.
And apparently nu-males... whatever they are anyway.
>>67229435
>tfwswn throw a 300mph baseball to your balls
>>67229838
The fuck is a nu-male?
I saw this movie at midnight when it came out, no ragrets.
Also, it has a p dank soundtrack.
Lore was good /{sparkling vampires}
I do like me some kstew. should i give this a go?
>>67230857
watching movies for a waifu is usually a bad idea. recipe for disaster.
applies even more when said waifu is known for shit acting and the movie would certainly rank among the top 10 of what people would come up with to answer "What was the worst movie in the last decade?".
I would say that it's probably not as bad as its rep. That's how far I'll go. Still pretty fucking bad tho.
>>67229436
I don't know. I heard JK Rowling didn't kill off Cedric until she found out Pattinson was cast as Edward. The world may never know.
>>67229436
Probably in a better place, you retarded tripfaggot.
Pattinson isn't a bad actor and this movie blighted his career.
>>67229903
just rip me limb from limb already and throw my pieces in a fire already ;_;'
>>67229519
depends on how many wolves there is
>>67229364
These stupid movies remind me of my ex. I'll occasionally get blackout drunk and marathon them while crying.
>>67231670
Cedric died in book 4, where the Twilight movies being cast when she was writing it? It was published in 2000.
>>67229364
I did too when the first movie came. But then super power combat kicked in and CGI was everywhere and there were no more lore or scenery
Or it's just the normal development of all franchise. The first movie is fresh and the rest are melodrama of character development.
I never cared for this thing called character development.
