>Ebert and Siskel both hated Home Alone 1 & 2 and thought they wouldn't amount to holiday classics
I wonder how they felt when it did
Also, are these two movies the only ones with acceptable slapstick? And why? So many movies try to do what these two did but never can get it right
>>66890507
Critics are autistic.
>>66890507
Home Alone 2 wasn't a holiday classic, Home Alone 1 was
So they were at least half-right
>>66890641
Fuck you HM2 is funnier and more comfy than HM1 will ever be
>>66890665
Fuck off cuck
I'm homealone
>>66890507
2 is not a classic. Shit sucks.
>>66890507
>Also, are these two movies the only ones with acceptable slapstick?
Only if you forget about Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton.
>>66890867
Home Alone 2 surpasses 1 in almost every conceivable way.
>>66891042
objectively wrong
>>66891086
HA2 has Tim Curry
HA1 does not
Visa vee, ergo, HA2 is superior.
>Ebert and Siskel
>>66890665
home alone 2 is a less funny carbon copy of home alone 1.
>>66891185
It is because of fanboys like you that Curry got fat.
>>66891219
Name something funnier than this in Home Alone 1 and I'll let you live.
>>66890507
You can judge alot about a person who doesn't like these movies. I remember one christmas being rugged up under a thick doona (comforter) with my family on the couch, flanked by my brother and my girlfriend at the time. I'd taken 30mg of Oxycodone on xmas eve and we were watching Home Alone 1 and 2 and I don't think I've ever been more comfy.
I also watched it prolifically as a kid. I think it's helped me retain my love of the holidays.
>>66891259
>skeletons
>funny in any way
You're sick anon
SICK
>>66891199
>Jerry and Tom
>>66891185
don't forget HA2 has trump
>>66891363
HA2 will be culturally more relevant than HA1 when Trump wins the presidency.
