Final Cut, but remove the unicorn scene.
>>66816791
I asked here what cut to watch and 90% were for the final one,so i did that.
>>66817335
Even if you remove the unicorn scene,you can tell the other replicants know he's a replicant.
>>66817335
>But remove a very important scene
What, to fit your fucking head canon?
>>66817528
To restore the ambiguity of the main character's nature.
>m-m-muh replicant Deckard
Ridley Scott is a fucking retard, Ford is right.
Blade Runnerer is going to be complete ass.
All of them.
>>66817335
>muh Deckard's not a Replicant
Deckard was a replicant, just not the same kind of replicant as Roy. He didn't know he was a replicant.
>>66817586
>>66817590
in the original story its meant to be ambiguous
>>66817586
Ambiguity reinforces the idea that Deckard being a replicant or not ultimately does not matter in the slightest.
But sure, go ahead, follow the word of a literal retard.
Final Cut is best.
Pris is literally perfect
>>66817647
Yeah well Ridley fucked that up, didn't he? The unicorn dream nonsense basically confirms Deckard is a replicant in the movie. It's still left somewhat ambiguous, but it's heavily implied.
>>66817686
The unicorn dream literally confirms Deckard as a replicant.
It removes all ambiguity from the film.
>>66817730
It doesn't confirm it because it's never actually confirmed, retard. He could have known about that dream another way. But yes, as I said, it is heavily implied. Almost to the point where you can't question it, but not quite.
Didn't the newest cut give him the red glowing eyes? That pretty much confirms it, not the unicorn.
How can one movie be so perfect?
>>66817916
It's pretty badly paced and only has a few good scenes. It's far from perfect.
>>66818190
>my opinion is fact
Directors cut is better than final cut, scott was already senile and producing garbage when he cut it
>>66817916
how can one movie be so shit?
literally nothing of value besides the visuals
>>66819759
It's a study in what it means to be alive. Don't be obtuse.
