Would anyone be interested in seeing a very accurate potrayal of Genesis, and the life of Christ. My vision is to show "The Word" (hence picture), creation, the spiritual realm creating the physical. The fall of Lucifer and the war in Heaven and the life of Yeshua all subtitled in a divine language, Aramaic and Hebrew. Sorting out the Act structure currently. Ending is done.
I think a realistic portrayal of the life of the historical Jesus would be awesome, but that's not what you're talking about.
>>64558415
I'd rather see the Silmarillion
It actually is. It would have a length prologue though. My idea for the Seraphim is as follows. My vision for Christ is him with his hair tied back, longish beard, very Middle-Eastern/Jewish looking, even a Jewish actor.
>>64558576
>It actually is. It would have a length prologue though. My idea for the Seraphim is as follows. My vision for Christ is him with his hair tied back, longish beard, very Middle-Eastern/Jewish looking, even a Jewish actor.
I rather watch a gang bang then that Jesus shit. Get a fucking life.
>>64558415
>My vision is to show "The Word" (hence picture), creation, the spiritual realm creating the physical.
>>64558576
>It actually is.
>historical
>literally talking about angels
>>64558478
So, one thing that is drawing me to this is that it would be showing Christ as one of us, while also speaking and being fully God and fully us. Relating to us. Joking with us. And by us - I mean, "he sat with the sinners". There's two major plot points and I have them both sorted, the inciting incident actually begins with Adam too and I don't mean some blonde guy, I mean... A perfect human being, flawless, full of light. Then as sin comes... That light dims. Jesus definately wouldn't be wearing clean white robes, his feet would most likely be dusty, their showering would consist of a bath with oils and you are dealing with a man who was ultimately poor. So the real deal.
>>64558806
So, we are dealing with both the spiritual and the historical Jesus is the same Jesus of the Bible, the same one who came in the flesh who was born of the Spirit.
>>64558867
"A realistic portrayal of the historical Jesus" means he wouldn't be god. He would be the leader of one of the many messianic cults that were bouncing around at that time.
>>64558481
Likewise. It's a better story than the bible, and more humane.
>>64558415
Nice try Terry