What a hollow, showy, empty, overly long piece of shit, lacking in anything resembling meaning or humanity, coasting by on its behind-the-scenes gimmicks and a mere smattering of intense scenes.
>>64533912
The entire Mexican new wave are gimmicky hacks who are getting affirmative action awards because of their funny accents.
#BuildWall
David O Russell made the best film of 2015.
>>64533986
I bet you enjoy the films of Wes Anderson.
>>64534000
Did joy not be good?
American hustle was solid.
>>64533986
This is one of the most delusional posts I've ever seen. O'Russell's time has been and gone. He squandered it. Joy? Lmao, kill yourself. The only good film he made was Three Kings.
>>64533986
Actually Adam McKay made the best film of 2015.
>>64533912
>coasting by on its behind-the-scenes gimmicks
I see you also read Richard Brody
>>64534095
>>64534052
>>64534034
>>64534000
>>64533986
>>64533912
THAT POST, IT BELONGS TO ME
>>64534128
If you want it, come and claim it!
>>64533912
I loved it
>>64533912
I agree with this.
>>64534095
He's pretty good too, that screenplay alone was remarkable. Probably #2 of the year.
>>64533912
I cant enjoy fightscenes after watching Creed and Revenant.
They all look so shit now
>>64534052
Silver Linings Playbook was a masterpiece.
American Hustle was a masterpiece.
Joy is his greatest masterpiece yet.
3 Kings is his entry level film for plebs.
>>64534362
>calling David O. Russell's wank stains masterpieces
just kill yourself and make the money your parents squandered on the initial failed abortion worth it
>>64534613
Joy is the great American film of the 21st century.
I bet you enjoy the flicks of Christopher Nolan.
>>64534095
not even close mate
I....actually agree with someone on something here. I thought this was the most over rated movie of the year. Only interesting parts were the very beginning and the very end(which was predictable as fuck anyway)
the "emotional" part was so dull it just shat over the rest of the movie
did they really need to add a mystical fucking voice to the background
>>64533912
Are you sure you're not describing Last Year at Marienbad, OP? I thought /tv/ liked foreign, pretentious movies.
A wet pudding of a film. Do not care for it. Puffed up. Corncobby nonsense. Never liked it.
>>64536626
Marienbad isn't pretentious you stupid fuck, pretentious means insisting on meaning where there is none. The filmmakers never did that, they were quite open about it being a narrative experiment, it's the critics that creamed themselves.
>>64533912
>movie is massively hyped about leo's performance.
>his character is only interesting in the last 5 minutes and tom hardy basically steals the show from him
Yet another massively overhyped Oscar bait from Innaritu. It looked nice, though, I'll give it that.
>>64538306
Tom Hardy is an overacting cartoon character. Leo gave a great subtle performance.
>>64538306
>it looked nice
It did not. It's 3hrs of floaty dollies with closeups of anguished diarrhea faces. You got cucked by the color scheming, senpai.
>>64538210
Terribly sorry, old bean. I was simply tracking OP's comment and it very closely described what I felt upon watching Last year at Marienbad. Except for the "smattering of intense scenes." I don't recall Marienbad being intense in any way.
-kisses!
>>64538306
Leo was fine but inconsistent. Hardy overacted for this movie.
>>64533986
I'm actually mexican and I agree fuck inarritu and cuaron, bunch of hacks.
>>64533912
>scene by scene gimmicks
It's a fucking western dip shit. They always have random problems pop up for the protagonist as he/she tries to reach the main goal.
>Overly long
If you don't like slow films, don't fucking watch Westerns. Problem solved.
