Why has no one ever surpassed him? What was the key to his work?
>>64463158
>Why has no one ever surpassed him?
Terrence Malick has, or is on the same level at the very least.
>>64463158
HE WAS A PHOTOGRAPHER AND UNDERSTOOD LENSES AND FILM ON A PROFOUND LEVEL
>>64463158
>What was the key to his work?
understanding how to dramatize abstract ideas
and that genre is an illusion
He spent an inordinate amount of time on detail.
>>64463390
Literally autism.
>>64463390
The key to his work was that he was autistic but not fully autistic. He could talk and work with people but he had autistic traits such as overworking on the details, refilming the same scene for 70 times and things like these that lead a movie to perfection.
>>64463158
"Authenticity" is the key to all of his work. And the time, he had prime period, allowed this artist to perfect his vision.
>>64464400
He wasn't autistic. He wanted things done his way, as perfect as possible.
>>64465530
He was a complete shut in who barely left his house. Watched TV/Films all day every day, only breaking to read. And was super obsessive about incredibly small details.
Yes he was autistic.
>>64465667
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa-KBqOFgDQ
you might learn a thing or two about Kubrick, and not just the same old clichés
>>64463158
>no one ever surpassed him
WRONG
>>64465858
Who did !?
>>64465667
Nope, he happened to be way too famous. At the same time he was very protective of his family and personal life. It's called dignity.
>>64463158
Kubrick influened bunch of retards that think if you have pretty, non-ugly images you have a good cinematography and I hate him for that.
Kubrick also did only one good movie and that's 2001.
Tarkovsky said his work was souless
>>64466247
This.
>>64463158
Literally who?
>>64466269
Tarkovsky was a bitter old man, as much as I love him.
Prime Coppola>Prime Scorsese>De Palma>Kubrick>Scorsese>De Palma
>>64466311
Tarkovsky was a manlet, enough said.
>>64466269
Tarkovsky hated almost everything.but he was probably right
>>64466348
>Zombie 2
what did he expect?
>>64466269
Well yeah his later career was soulless as fuck. Just pretty photography ignorant of what was photographer *^**GOOOD CINEMATOGRAPHY**
His, Kubrick's legacy, is mostly fucking shit.ö
Then again Tark doesn't even have legacy
>>64466348
except for The Terminator
>>64466247
>kubrick did only one good movie
>what is FMJ, Dr Strangelove, The Shining, A Clockwork Orange
And that's only the movies I've seen. I'm pretty sure, Spartacus and Lolita were pretty good too.
![kubrick21[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/W8uipnz.jpg "kubrick21[1].jpg")
>>64463158
>"Hitler was right about almost everything."
What did he mean by this?
>>64466348
>Did he actually die not knowing he was a hack
Kek
>>64466445
Spartacus doesn't count because he didn't have full control over the film.
FMJ is the worst of his late movies (still godtier tho)
>>64466269
>“2001: A Space Odyssey is phony on many points, even for specialists. For a true work of art, the fake must be eliminated.”
>“Tarkovsky supposedly made Solaris in an attempt to one-up Kubrick after he had seen 2001 (which he referred to as cold and sterile),”
>The Russian auteur indicts what he sees as 2001‘s lack of emotional truth due to its excessive technological invention, effectively declaring that, in his own foray into the realm of science-fiction, “everything would be as it should. That means to create psychologically, not an exotic but a real, everyday environment that would be conveyed to the viewer through the perception of the film’s characters. That’s why a detailed ‘examination’ of the technological processes of the future transforms the emotional foundation of a film, as a work of art, into a lifeless schema with only pretensions to truth.”
KEKbrick BTFO
>>64466476
FMJ had an amazing first act, mediocre second act.
>>64466269
Movies reflect the director's personality. Tarkovsky and Kubrick were probably very different. The thing is cold, distant, sterile or whatever you can tell a Kubrick's film right away. His movies might look commercial, but they are still very personal in the sense they represent not his personal life or experiece, but his views and interests.
>>64466517
Nah, second act is better senpai
>>64466293
>This.
IS WRONG
>>64463916
>>64464399
hello reddit
>>64466348
>Zombie II
That movie is THE ghastly piece of revolting trash.
>>64467071
admit it: you're the same fag who made the pacific rim thread
>>64463390
Your beard and corduroy culture is showing. You should probably not try so hard to appear patrician.
>>64463390
>Terrence Malick has, or is on the same level at the very least.
no, good cinematography alone does not a director make.
>>64465858
>Le exposition man of over explained movies.
no
>>64465858
>>64467195
Did you notice how he uses meme actresses? Scarlett Johansson, Ellen Page, Anne Hathaway.
Who is he going to cast as the meme woman in Dunkirk?
>>64466348
>did he die not knowing he was a hack?
>>64466269
Compare any of Kubricks movies to Solaris which was the movie he was talking about in context and in comparison to 2001 and tell me there is more soulless acting, cinematography and special effects in 2001 over Solaris I fucking dare you. Even those characters in Solaris were anymore dead eyed they'd be furniture in Clockwork.
>>64463158
>What was the key to his work?
>choose the right book to adapt
>intercut between dreamy sequences
>combine with classical music
>contrast beauty with brutality
>build in detail nobody but filmnerds will ever know about
le stonley kubrack masterpiece
His IQ was 210.
>>64465756
Kek.
At 45:40 Kubrick starts talking about sexy 12 year olds.
>>64463390
That's nice, kid.
>>64463158
He was an intelligent, self-made man who distanced himself from the Hollywood Jew.
Your daily reminder that he was fantasising about sucking white dick.
>>64467259
>choose a sciency subject
>intercut between philosophical sequences
>combine with Hans Zimmer music
>contrast the science of the subject with complete bullshit
>rely on some special effects and people being morons
Your Christopher Nolan masterpiece
>>64466348
>Did he actually die not knowing he was a hack
>He is a pleb
>>64467667
Stop posting pics of him, he's too damn charming to criticize.
>>64467667
Is he auteur? I don't think he has any style to him, like PWSA or Fincher.
Like all thre Bat movies look different visually and aesthetically.
>>64465858
>the biggest since the silent era
>>64465858
He just rip off movies and even worse than tarantino. His most original movie is memento. Then he did boring capeshit also rip off matrix and rip off space oddysey he makes blockbuster movies and people like it because they think that those movies are clever but in fact they are not.
>>64466348
Are all of these real?? I love this man!!
PTA has the potential to.
>>64463158
jar jar
>>64467902
I can't believe he's only 45. I'm looking forward to seeing his career pan out in the future.
>What was the key to his work?
Providing no clearly defined visual metaphors and countless vagueries for psuedo-intellectual snobs (film critics) to pour over in a vain attempt to feel important.
>>64468027
Same here, I wonder if he will ever top The Master.
Excited to see what he does next.
>>64468041
pore
>>64467902
That dude hasn't made original 'PTA style' movie yet.
All of his movies feels like some one pressed pseudo-cinephile.exe on their Applemac and shat out a fucking movie.
>>64468074
thx
nah
>>64463419
This, despite the caps lock.
Kubrick is a genius that gets a bad rap because he's every little kid's entry level director
>>64463158
He was extremely autistic with his attention to detail and meticulous approach to filmaking.
>>64463390
> comparing Terrence the Malick to Kubrik
Do you even nigger brah?
What did Kubrick think of Star Wars?
>>64471027
>I'm not interested in this garbage for teenagers
- Stanley Kubrick on Star Wars
>>64463158
Tarkovsky did
>>64471071
Tarkovsky was a great 'spiritual' filmmaker. The problem with that is, god doesn't fucking exist.
>>64463916
>>64464399
>>64467154
>>64467172
>>64467588
>>64470714
Typical Kubrick Reddit babbys, can't even into Malick.
>>64471157
Shut the fuck up
>>64471157
>>64471404
>THE CRUSADES WERE BAD
