>There are people ITT who unironically saw this 3D
oooh boy oh boy
>>64245669
>3D is still a thing
When I went to go see it yesterday my local theatre had 2 showing of the non-3D and both were sold-out, so I bought the 3D tickets instead. How do you ironically see something in 3D?
>>64245669
I saw it in 3D IMAX. It was really well done. I recommend it.
>>64245669
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_highest-grossing_films
are there anyone ITT who didn't?
My theatre was showing 2D version on a smaller screen, so saw it in 3D.
>>64245758
Seconding this. And I'm normally not a fan of 3D.
>>64245669
I can't see 3D, so saw it on a smaller screen. Wish they would show it on one of the bigger screens in 2D...
It wasn't available in 2D when I saw it so I saw the 3D version, but it was only $6 at my theater so it wasn't really a big deal. I wouldn't have paid extra tho
>>64245669
Worse. I watched it in 3D IMAX. I have committed a truly awful sin, lord forgive me.
>>64245669
All cinemas in my region only showed it in 3D.
it's actually one of the few well done 3D movies that don't go all IN 3D but still know how to use Camera position and focus to make good pictures. Also 3D effect is really nice on the beginning roll
