>Unironically not enjoying one of the top 3 movie franchises of all time.
>Not growing up with one of the best stories ever written both on and off screen
I weep for you /tv/
Clearly someone roasted your shit taste in another thread and because you were too slow witted to make a good retort there you made this one instead.
>Harry Potter
>anything but shit
Harry Potter is the definition of plebshit manufactured for uneducated morons. Get some decent taste, plebeian.
CINÉMA:
1: 夢 (1990, Kurosawa)
2: This Night (1965, Fassbinder)
3: La morte d'Isotta (1968, Schröter)
4: Reassemblage (1982, Minh Hà)
5: Кpaдeцът нa пpacкoви (1964, Radev)
6: โรงแรมนรก (1957, Pestonji)
7: قمران وزيتونة (2001, Abdelhamid)
8: ¾إشآ (1984, Zhuangzhuang)
9: Ocْنeيè ؤyّè (1975, Radev)
10: Three Kings (1999, Russell)
FILMS:
1. دècüىa ى¸pٍâoمo ÷eëoâeêa (1986, Lopushansky)
2. Un condamné à mort s'est échappé (1956, Bresson)
3. Guns of The Trees (1961, Mekas)
4. Love Streams (1984, Cassavetes)
5. êôژX½ضةظؤêڑ¢بثتآ¼ (1991, Yang)
6. Duelle (1976, Rivette)
7. Alice in den Stنdten (1974, Wenders)
8. Le Rayon Vert (1986, Rohmer)
9. Սայաթ-Նովա (1968, Parajanov)
10. Mauvais Sang (1986, Carax)
MOVIES:
1. Barry Lyndon(1975, Kubrick)
2. “Vچ‘‚ئ’nچ– (1963, Kurosawa)
3. Blue (1993, Jarman)
4. Fanny och Alexander (1982, Bergman)
5. The Long Day Closes (1992, Davies)
6. “Vچ‘‚ئ’nچ– (1963, Kurosawa)
7. Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
8. Providence (1977, Resnais)
9. لت§بµاأأة (2006, Weerasethakul)
10. Punishment Park (1971, Watkins)
OVERALL:
Sommaren med Monika (1953, Bergman)
êôژX½ضةظؤêڑ¢بثتآ¼ (1991, —î)
চারুলতা (1964, রায়)
Ordet (1955, Dreyer)
Les Moissons du Ciell (1978, Malick)
Oêٍےلpü «ؤecےٍü نيeé, êoٍopûe ïoٍpےcëè ىèp (1927, فéçeيٍّeéي)
؛ى¸كء» (1987, صإزصؤ±)
Fear and Desire (1953, Kubrick)
اepêaëo (1975, Tapêَâcêèé)
01010101 01101110 00100000 0100001101101000 01101001 01100101 0110111000100000 01000001 01101110 0110010001100001 01101100 01101111 01110101(1928, Luis Buٌuel)
ہثبA±¯¸è (1936, œد؟ع)
Le Révélateur (2002, Philippe Garrel)
>>64187071
>>64187104
ohh shhiiiiiiieeeeeeeeeet
>>64187216
Exactly, Harry Potter was easily one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the seriesüf only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but itüfs certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books are g-g-good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King
>>64187216
All forgotten and will be forgotten
>>64187104
ooh please point me in the right direction I seem to have lost that thread
>>64187071
ive watched the first 4 movies a decent amount
1-2 aren't very good but they're somewhat comfy and enjoyable. 3 and 4 are both good and fun. 5 is trash and i turned off 6 20 minutes into it and havent bothered to finish.
I enjoy the Harry Potter universe/lore but despise almost all of the protagonists and villains for being uninteresting and underdeveloped.
Never read the books.
Excellent pasta mate surely you who is an expert on literature can write something much more applicable and worthwhile.
>>64187071
Can you name one hard choice the main character is presented with?
Can you name one way in which any of the characters change, i.e. exhibit a character arc?
>>64187216
Kurosawa used Arabic in a movie title?
>>64187216
>autism: the post
>>64187071
I liked the first one. None of the subsequent ones were as good.
>>64187495
>people still falling for this bait
