Are you going to upgrade your bluray collection to 4K? Is physical media dead?
>>64169834
>newfags don't have everything on 8mm and beta
>>64169886
>not watching movies at your local saloon's nickelodeon
You goddam kids & your technology
>>64169834
hey guys it's me the blu ray KING
>>64169834
Such a complete and utter waste of money.
I still buy movies on DVD.
No, the human eye can't tell the difference between 1080p and 4K
>>64170357
blatant lie, poorfag.
>>64169834
what for?
the human eye can't tell the difference between one banana and two bananas
>>64169834
I'm only gonna upgrade the movies that would really benefit from it, so probably not that many.
I probably won't even buy a 4k player until 2017 since the first machines like DVD and Bluray players all were like 1 grand when they first came out.
>>64169834
getting one of these because I'm disgusted by how many blu ray cases I have on my shelves and I hardly ever watch them
>>64169834
>doesnt haveL O S Tcollectors set
what do 4k cases look liek lmao
that's all that maters
>>64169834
>>64170169
Assuming $20 per Bluray / DVD, I calculated the value of that collection to be about $30,000
I enjoy owning blu-rays, whether they be 1080 or 4k, I'm going to keep collecting them. I never got into collecting VHS or DVD when it was a good time to do so, so even when Blurays become utterly obsolete (they are already somewhat, thanks to digital) I'll probably continue buying them.
Like I said, this is for collecting purposes. I actually watch stuff mostly in digital format on a 2TB hard drive I own, though I'm running out of space. I'll probably nab a 5 TB soon.
Pic related, my film collection. What do you guys think? It doesn't take up space and I'm not wasting $20 on a disc I'm going to watch a few times.
>>64169834
Physical media has been dead since the invention of the smartphone.
>>64170997
>only watching movies a "few times"
>>64169834
why the freak would you buy so many shitty mindless flicks ? like actual copies, costing actual money, actually encouraging these studios and production companies ? why would you do it?
>>64170997
Also requires stealing.
>>64171049
How many views would it take to justify spending ~$20 on a disc?
people itt are the people that don't pirate movies and still don't understand why anyone would want to buy a movie
If 4k is so much better than full hd, how come it'll fit in the same disc? Wouldn't it require more capacity to store a higher quality movie?
>>64169834
>Actually buying Blu Rays
MAD MAN
A
D
M
A
N
I own less than 10 cause I knew 4k and Red Ray were coming as early as 2008, only good thing is half your collection will be online as well thanks to Ultraviolet.
>>64169834
All that wasted monnies..
>>64170997
okay, amazon.com
>>64171217
>>64171217
>wasting money on upscaaled shit
A retard is you.
>>64171273
New blurays can hold much higher capacities
>>64169834
I haven't even really started upgrading from DVD to BluRay, so no. I more than likely won't.
I will never collect physical movies for the sole reason that they change format. You all look fucking retarded with your huge VHS and DVD collections and youll look retarded with a huge Blur Ray collection as well.
As long as ISP data caps exist, physical media will also exist.
Unless you download a 700mb YIFY and think that's adequate.
