>watching star wars for the first time
>currently on episode VI
do I need to watch the prequels to watch VII?
>>64056732
No don't watch them until after, it's better that way, that's the intended order.
Watch 5 and 6, then the prequels
>>64056732
No.
ITT idiots cant into roman numerals.
Yes, OP. Now go watch the prequels before VII
>>64056732
The best order is theatrical release. You could have also done 4, 5, prequels, then 6 and 7.
>>64056732
Dont watch the prequels. You'll hate your self for it.
>>64056732
Too late for machete order but watch them anyway, considering they're very good films. I wish I was you so I could watch them for the first time again.
VII doesn't seem to make explicit reference to it. You might speculate thatKylo's hairdois a nod to Anakin's hairstyle. Or thatthe planet destroyed by the New Orderis Coruscant, since the shot of a populated city on the surface looks similar to the surface of Coruscant in the prequels.
The best order for someone who hasn't seen any of them would be:
IV -> V -> III -> VI
III between V and VI as a flashback explaining how Anakin became Vader. I is entirely unnecessary, II has small things relevant to III but can also be skipped.
>>64057478
>PERHAPS CLONETROOPERS
>THEY HAVE GONE BY MANY NAMES
THE SITH, THE EMPIRE AND NOW FIRST ORDER
lmao
The advised order to watch the Star Wars films is 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7
VII isnt even a star wars flick its just disney and jj abrams making an action/adventure movie set in a star wars theme.
>>64057509
>III between V and VI as a flashback explaining how Anakin became Vader. I is entirely unnecessary, II has small things relevant to III but can also be skipped.
The whole PT is unnecessary.
So far i've seen
IV -> V --> VI --> ??
Should I watch VI? Or should I wait and watch these Jar Jar hellish prequels?
i meant VII. sorry.
>>64057115
>that's the intended order.
