![http___o.aolcdn.com_hss_storage_midas_6c5a925f0739e006d4029767283b8bd4_203140829_star+wars+rotten+tomatoes[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Dq1xGWc.jpg "http___o.aolcdn.com_hss_storage_midas_6c5a925f0739e006d4029767283b8bd4_203140829_star+wars+rotten+tomatoes[1].jpg")
>when you know you cant trust rotten tomatoes ever again
Way ahead of you
isn't that basically a perfect synopsis of the movie though? It brought fresh new actors while keeping old actors in the rotation, and brought about new ideas while referencing past events.
>>63891951
But anon The Force Awakens is bad because it's popular!
>>63891997
no its bad because its bad
>>63891784
>The Dark Knight Rises
>>63891784
>thinking that screenshot is in any way inaccurate
the half in the bag review has already been posted, you have been BTFO
>>63891784
>so let's make more publicity!
Thanks Rajesh
>>63892191
>the half in the bag
who cares about these middle aged fat losers opinion anymore?
certainly not me friend
>>63891951
Which new ideas?
>>63891997
TFA is good because it's popular!
>>63892660
when the only critiques from anyone are "its too much like ANH" or "the main character needed more flaws"...
Reminder boyhood is the greatest film of all time
Reminder according the logic of TFA fans Ghostbusters female is going to GOAT too
>>63892086
well obviously the majority of the population disagrees with you.
OP here
i was literally just bored out of my fucking mind, was happy when han died cause i thought it was almost over
After over seven years of Marvel cape trash getting praised, this is the point where you lose your trust in RT?
>>63892697
Those are valid reasons to dislike the movie.
>>63891784
Why OP!? It was literally Fanservice: The Movie with. MUH ORIGINAL CHARACTERS and the same exact fucking plot from Episode 4. That's what people want right? Nothing original, just the same spoon fed shit over and over.
>>63891784
>Average Rating: 8.4/10
That seems about right comparing this to other Star Wars flicks.
>>63892779
at least the marvel chicks are hot, we dont have to see old ass carrie fisher or teeth face girl
>>63892766
I hate everything new and popular too. look how refined my tastes are.
>>63892881
bro you are really reaching
i like new and popular shit all the time, this was not good
are u upset?
>>63892784
right, but not enough to make it a bad movie
>>63892927
I thought it was good. so did most other people that saw it. maybe star wars movies aren't your thing.
>>63892881
You sound more insecure than the people you're trying to attack
Do you think and speak to people like this in real life too?
post more rt score compilations
>>63893114
No i realize everybody is entitled to their opinion i just notice that being a contrarian for the sake of being a contrarian is popular on this board.
>>63893074
Yes, it being blatant, pandering, plagarism of ANH does make it a bad movie.
>>63893267
So yes then.
If you use the word "contrarian," you're literally an idiot. It's an invented concept by idiots with childish sensibilities who are too fragile to deal with criticism of mediocre media that has widespread appeal.
It's a troubling manifestation of millennials' mental weakness. Seriously, the only people who would even entertain any "argument" involving the concept of being "contrarian" are weak, lazy idiots who can't deal with criticism substantively.
If it bothers you that much that people criticize mediocre mass-marketed work designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator, like Star Wars, Breaking Bad, pop music, etc., you should find a safe bubble and stay there. Or kill yourself.
>>63893310
>plagarism
Disney owns Star Wars. It's not like Lucas didn't rehash a ton of in the prequels. It's called poetry, it rhymes.
>>63891951
New ideas? It was ANH reskinned, you stupid nigger.
>>63893313
agree with it all except for the millennial part. Lot of people in this age gap didn't like TFA and are honestly disussing about it
>>63893491
Every person I know who saw ANH in 77 liked this movie. The people I know who dislike it have been around my age. The age of the EU faggot, mid to late 20's. Star Wars had a huge resurgence in the 90's.
Rotten Tomatoes is the percentage of critics who gave positive reviews. What counts as positive? Does 6/10? If they all gave it a 6/10, a 95% can be misleading about it's actual quality.
>>63893388
>didn't rehash a ton of in the prequels
he didn't reshash a single thing
he produced poetry
J.J. couldn't rhyme to save his life
Rotten Tomatoes is right though.
>>63893619
Really because its been the opposite for me
Do people not realise how RT works? If a everyone gave a movie 7/10 it would have 100% on RT.
>>63893690
I get why he did it. He needed a clean slate. Honestly, if he removed the destruction of Starkiller it would have been up there with IV.
>>63893619
hmm, interesting, i'm towards late 20s too. people around my age here didn't like it, they thought it was at the very best a "meh movie to spend an evening".
>>63893757
>If a everyone gave a movie 7/10 it would have 100% on RT.
This literally never happens, though.
http://strawpoll.me/6322927
http://strawpoll.me/6322927
>>63891784
>/tv/ constantly shitposts about how bad a movie will be
>RT "likes" it
>Metacritic "likes" it
>90% (and up) of reviews like it
>RLM likes it
>It sets multiple records its opening weekend
>You see it and its actually good
This board is terrible. Always has been, atleast you guys aren't /mu/ though, they are so far up there own contrarian asses that when they make something popular they bail on it because its popular.
>>63893934
you forgot to say we didn't like it because we're racist white pigs believing in a world jew conspiracy
>>63891784
Train wreck was all you needed to know how shit is fucked up.
Reminder that this is RT's top 10 list of best films of ALL time (based on the overall score)
1. The Wizard of Oz (1939)
2. The Third Man (1949)
3.Citizen Kane (1941)
4.All About Eve (1950)
5.Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari. (The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari) (1920)
6. Modern Times (1936)
7.A Hard Day's Night (1964)
8.The Godfather (1972)
9.E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial (1982)
10.Metropolis (1927)
>>63893207
Literally everything in this image is garbage
>>63891784
TFA is the 2015 movie equivalent of Justin Bieber PROVE ME WRONG
>>63893313
Im well aware the movie has flaws. i just like it despite that. Stop being such a bitter contrarian hipster and enjoy things once in awhile.
>>63894141
No because the people that constantly cry about beaver and stuff like tbbt are the ones that praise trash like TFA
>>63892697
being poorly written is a legitimate criticism
>>63893207
>TD and GOT s1 lower than supersjw and memes of thrones s5
jesus fucking christ
>>63893388
>>63893690
It's not rhyming if it's the exact same thing.
>>63894231
Its not though
Do you retards not understand how Rotten Tomatoes works?
>>63892086
But it isn't.
It has some problems with pacing, few things aren't explained good enough and the main character is a Mary Sue, but it's a fucking amazing blockbuster movie with ton of creative ideas, likable characters and well directed sequences. It's not the second coming of Christ, but yeah, it's objectively a very well-made movie.
>>63894283
yes paid shill right a review and the Jews at RT make it what they want.
>>63893207
Left half is very fair tbqh
>>63894314
you wouldn't have seen it in theaters if there wasn't STAR WARS in the title. I dare you to contraddict this
>>63891997
No its bad because awful editing/action scenes, zero gravitas. no attempts at emotional resonance ring true, because they feel like they popped off an assembly line in a nerd's basement. kylo ren is a cartoon, and has zero of the imposing nature of his idol. like a failed pilot episode of a star wars spinoff, this is a joke.
>>63894283
You act like you're giving novel insight every time you post this. It's still an average score of 8.4/10.
>>63893313
I dont think you know what contrarian means friend.
>>63894479
This is a stupid argument
>>63894314
>ton of creative ideas
>likable characters
Such as?
>>63894613
>i don't know how to counter that, i'll use a meme buzzword.
Please chose one from the list below:
stupid, retarded, autist, shill, contrarian
>>63894613
why
>>63893313
Thank you.
This schlock was designed to appeal to the greatest possible number of people, in doing so you are guaranteed to make a mediocre movie because that's what most people want.
>>63893934
>RLM likes it
They didn't like Boyhood, their opinion is worthless.
It's literally just A New Hope with more DIVERSITY. How could anyone be pleased with such a blatantly unoriginal and creatively bankrupt exercise in nostalgia-baiting?
>>63895114
because normies don't give a shit and they're 95% of the audience.
>>63893934
>RLM likes it
You mean the same people who concocted the whole 'muh 12 years' meme to trash Boyhood?
Yeah, sorry not gonna take their opinion seriously.
I stopped caring about tomato years ago
jesus it has gone down hill
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/star-wars-episode-vii---the-force-awakens
>>63891997
If you use the word "contrarian," you're literally an idiot. It's an invented concept by idiots with reddit sensibilities who are too fragile to deal with criticism of mediocre media that has widespread appeal.
It's a troubling manifestation of millennials' mental weakness. Seriously, the only people who would even entertain any "argument" involving the concept of being "contrarian" are weak, lazy idiots who can't deal with criticism substantively.
If it bothers you that much that people criticize mediocre mass-marketed work designed to appeal to the lowest common denominator, like Star Wars, Breaking Bad, pop music, etc., you should find a safe bubble and stay there. Or kill yourself.
I swear, I once dreamed about a SJW, calling ''In The Heart Of The Sea'' shit, not only because it's men doing men stuff, but becauseTHE FIRST WHALE THEY KILLED WAS A FEMALEThe next day, I went full 'Ow The Edge'' mode on my lucid dream, and dreamed about every anonymous user of /tv/ killing the average SJW
>>63893934
This website exists just to fuck with people
>>63894776
>guaranteed to make a mediocre movie because that's what most people want.
Fuck you. It's not that most people want it, it's that most people will be fine with a mediocre movie.
What people want, even your braindead "normie," is a compelling story. There's no one who wouldn't have wanted an actually well written thought out sci fi movie, if it was possible. I just wish they could balance good story telling with the billions at risk.
>>63891784
You know something funny? in a few months the same people that try to prove this movie suck, will be talking about how great it actually was, and how it felt like a more serious sci fi movie, not a kids movie anymore. btw the prequels are still shit, if you think otherwise you have a shity taste, and I mean like Michael Bay-tier.
>>63896818
Reported to the FBI
>>63897284
>in a few months the same people that try to prove this movie suck, will be talking about how great it actually was,
This fucking hilarious turn around tactic
You're adorable you tasteless drone
>>63893934
>>>/r/eddit
If thinking for yourself is difficult I suggest you visit plebbit.
>>63892760
speak for yourself jackass, I thought it blew
>>63897389
I think the real drones are the ones that hate something for being popular, but you guys are way above that. Saying anything good about the prequels (except for the lightsaber duels) just proves that you have the taste of a toddler.
>>63897562
Now you've gone straight to the popular defense meme? Fucking amazing
If I completely stomp you, will you just say its all subjective in the end so it doesn't matter too?
I don't care for the prequels just so you know
>>63892758
this was one of three +90% ratings that made me forget about EVER referencing RT again. I went to Boyhood based on the ratings and wow what a shit film with no story arc or protagonist
Birdman was another one I saw I hated. Wes Anderson's pink hotel movie as another one I didn't hate, but it was pretty trivial.
basically I don't go see movies that might be contenders for next year's Oscars, since so much that gets in the door I can't stand. if they still get talked about by people I know I might got see them, but otherwise I've stopped.
>>63894503
>zero of the imposing nature of his idol.
That's the whole point of his character you fucking moron.
Kylo Ren wants to be hardcore but the force won't let him
You are the stupidest man on earth
>>63894314
>lots of creative ideas
its a reskin of a new hope, idiot
WHAT
ARE
AVERAGE
RATINGS
?
97% of critics thought it was a B/B- movie. They believe it's an above average film. Nothing profound, life changing or a cinema landmark.
i don't get it
they gave jarjar extra time and its still edited very poorly
>>63893207
>He can't see that Supergirl is averaging a C- but a vast majority of critics believe it deserves that C- while the other shows have much higher ratings but tend to polarize the reviewers a bit.
We're talking less than 100 reviewers, a handful objecting to violence or themes alter the meter significantly.
>>63892779
Pretty much this.
TFA is Star Wars-brand capeshit. It's no surprise the ratings are high.
>>63893207
>>63893619
I saw ANH in 77 and I enjoyed TFA. Solid B+
The Force Awakens is the best JJ Abrams movie I've ever seen, but that isn't saying much.
I'm more excited for when they drop this Marvel-Tier director for the next movie.
i don't browse /tv/ much, but you guys are enlightened enough to despise Marvel movies, right?
