Blunder of the century
>look mom, I posted it again
>>63881164
Nah it was good, a redemption of sorts
The prequels were better desu
We've got 85 years to go. It may wind up in the top 20, though.
>RLM says its great
>some butthurt neo-/tv/ redditor says its a blunder
Agreed, but you're not going to here it from the cancerous popnerds that have invaded this board until its cool to say so on facebook/reddit/imdb/ etc
>>63881218
redditors love tfa
>>63881218
you do realize that a literal recipe for failure is to have no main characters in a film's primary demo
imagine an urban youth film with a middle-class white man as the main character, this is the same principle. relatability is important whether you understand the first week of b-school curriculum or not
>starcucks will defend this
Worst movie I've ever seen.
>>63881218
>"neo"
