Just saw pic related
Man, what a bummer
>That ending
what if I told you that this movie is based on a book that was the "double" of a another book, which also was adapted to cinema on the previous year
P O T E R Y
>>63725071
It sucked senpai, I'm so disappointed
>>63724938
What bummed you out about it?
>>63725123
Explain
>>63725127
I just think this movie is trying too hard to have an amazing plot twist, to end with a stupid story about a crazy guy
great fucking film. It's too bad gyllenhaal takes shit roles now
>>63724938
this movie is so fucking comfy. I think Villeneuve just didn't quite know how to end it. Doesn't really make much difference to me though because the atmosphere and pacing is so fucking perfect. Great score too.
>>63725208
I'm confused by this comment, no one was crazy and there was no twist.
Side not who's excited for Blade Runner? I think it will be a fairly hollow movie story-wise, like most of villeneuve's film, but I'm really excited to see how he plays around with the aesthetic. He's awesome at building atmosphere
>>63725173
>Dostoievski's Dublul, 1846
>Saramago's O Homem Duplicado, 2002
>Enemy, 2013
>The Double, 2013
Its bascially the same history, and the works follow each others trajectory
>>63725208
What plot twist?
>>63726236
>atmosphere
You mean tension. Villeneuve's basic and by the books indie visual style be jarring if he doesn't drastically change it to form a continuity with the original.
>>63724938
Is this part of the skinnyboy memethos?
