Why didn't George Lucas make the fourth Indy about some Muslim artifact? It could have had ISIS-style villains (similar to pic related), would have been pretty dank.
Because that's a shit idea and you're complete faggot.
Sincerely, /tv/
>>63689214
Cuz Spielberg doesn't have the balls to do that anymore
>>63689253
Well it's better than ayyy lmao and le womyn ruskie
>>63689253
go back to your cave, bitch.
>>63689214
How about some old Sumerian/Babylonian artifact and Indy running away into Saddam's army?
>>63689287
>in the 1950's
Besides, wasn't the Babylonian-Sumerian thing already done in the Infernal Machine?
>>63689214
Because that's racist!
>>63689431
Just have the token good guy Muslims, something similar to the Brotherhood from Last Crusade.
>>63689214
Someone should seriously do this. Radical Muslims are the perfect foil.
I don't know if you've noticed, but it's pretty much an unwritten rule that you can't have muslim villains in movies anymore unless it's based a true story.
>>63689214
Muslims don't really have artifacts, except for that meteor on the outside of their cube, which they don't believe has powers and Indy wouldn't be too interested in.
Maybe something like an ancient babylonian idol that was secretly holding the world together, and a sect of wahabis wanted to destroy it for paganism but indy had to get it first to save the world. That's about as close as you can get.
>>63689884
Iron man 1 & 3 you faggot
>>63690016
And in both of those they were simply being manipulated by the big bad white man who the real bad guy.
