Thoughts?
>>63581069
Liked it, but there were problems with the characters' behaving rationally. Still, really liked it on the level of Pan's Labyrinth and Devil's Backbone. This is the kind of movie GDT should always be making.
>>63581069
melodrama masquerading as horror.
not good at all.
5/10
>>63581117
it's not really masquerading as anything, there's no premise of horror anywhere
>>63581108
>there were problems with thmane characters' behaving rationally
yeah, this
>there's this shitty old mansion that literally falls and has shit leaks
>I'm gonna move there and live there!and even if the girl was stupid and naive, why did the brother and the sister also still live there in the first place? they should have had enough money from the previous three scams to buy a better house, and it wouldn't affect their schemes in any way
>>63581069
7/10
I got what I expected, having seen previous works of GDT.
But I can understand the negative reviews
> Let's go see this horrr flick
> 2deep4me
> Not enough jumpscares
>>63581069
cute
>>63581241
not to mention why did they keep all that damning evidence in a box in their house when they could just burn it.
>>63581269
Wow she is damn ugly, how did they cover up that fact in the movie so well
It was prettycrimsonweak
>>63581108
it was shit, did you stick around for the end?
>>63581117
this
>>63581241
this
>>63581347
Yes. It made me happy. Based Charlie Hunnam didn't die.
qt
>>63581137
ok, if you wish to play that game, it was melodrama, and it was shit...just like the babadook.
GDT at his best is great...this is shit.
>>63581069
6/10
ghosts impact the story in no way and the story is painfully predictable
still its a beautiful movie, and the acting is great, the script is a generic and uninspired as it gets but at lest its well written
but i cant help to wonder how much better it would be if it dropped its ghost horror elements and became more of a atmospheric thriller
>>63581117
It never presented itself as horror - it's a Gothic romance.
