So is this a 2013 film, a 2014 film or a 2015 film?
Either way, what a fucking film.
>>63575281
It's a 2014 flick. A really shitty one.
>>63575281
real films don't use black and white GIMMICKS
>>63575400
>>>r/movies
>>63575400
>>63575427
a y y
y
y
OP a movie on your life would be called "Hard to be a kuck"
Best film of the decade, without a doubt.
>>63575456
thanku kind sen.pai
what did you think of the film
>>63575432
>based on a book written by the Jewish authors
>director is a Jew
>lead actor is a Jew
>whole film is a metaphor for the troubleseme life of the few chosen people in Russia, the land of mud and shit
BRAVA GERMAN
>>63575493
>film
It's a flick and nothing more
>>63575566
silly billy
>Netflix "patricians"
Is Dogtooth one of your favorite movies too?
>>63575281
Is the torrent out?
>>63575665
It's been out
>>63575627
>Tarkovsky "patricians"
Is Malick one of your favorite directors too?
>>63575736
i bet you enjoy the films of bela tarr
>>63575736
>what is a reaction image?
I suspect a determined effort by director Gherman to make the worst film ever and have fools rave about it - this reminds me of the 1910 Boronali hoax.
I have watched my share of art films that take their time, gaze at their navel, suffer from all kinds of flaws, but all had redeeming qualities or were worth getting through for a splendid last scene. This is not the case. This film is like the "Find the fish" segment in Monty Python's The meaning of life, if it had been extended to three hours, directed by Woody Allen's blind character in Hollywood ending and edited by a mad Terry Gilliam under carte blanche form the studio. No sentence makes sense. No one ever answers a question, which is irrelevant because not one question makes sense. Every minute of this film could be shuffled around and no context would be missed. Every one of the hundreds of meaningless character who crosses the field right against the lens is obsessed with shoving: someone is always shoving someone else. Even the hens who appear at a point seem flummoxed by the utter insanity going on.
And of course, a close-up of a donkey's phallus. How daring.
There are involuntary brilliant moments: for instance when, despite everyone's indifference to the constant rain of urine and feces which spares none, indoors or out, for the entire film, a character exclaims: "hey, don't piss on my boots !"
To summarize: the incessant occurrences of people willingly eating excrement and smelling dirty boots in this film is a blunt metaphor for us watching it. Hats off to M. Gherman for a qualified success.
>>63575773
where is this from
>>63575772
>I-I j-just collect hundreds of images of pleb directors as reaction images, I don't actually like them
Hahaha yikes
Keep to reddit, kid
2014 :^)
A film in which the oblique is rivaled only by the visceral. An abandonment of formal dramaturgy gives way to a hallucinatory fever dream where documentary-style intimacy elicits a Brechtian estrangement: the camera meanders through scenes as a God-figure onto itself, while others peer directly into its lens in acknowledgement of its omnipresence. Each element of the mise-en-scène is clouded in a primordial miasma, rendering the viewing experience a visual feast of the grotesque.
>>63575858
The Better Angels is a laughable Malick-approved Malick rip-off.
>>63575835
What director do YOU like, senpai?
>>63575858
I really hope Thou Wast Mild is better than Butter On The Latch
>>63575890
That alone makes it better than most movies :^)
>>63575902
I'll say Godard because I know it'll trigger you.
>>63576012
>I'll be ironic because it's the only defense I have
>>63576041
Wow I was right.
>>63576128
Right about what? That you can't even answer a simple question without being all ironic about it?
>>63576182
Don't worry senpai I'll put a trigger warning next time.
>>63575281
Is that based on that book about a space race guy infiltrating a medieval society?
I played the video game, it was nice.
>>63576210
But you did in your non-sincere answer. Does being riled up in so much irony cause memory loss?
>>63576262
The point of a trigger warning is that it goes before the triggering material. Has watching reddit shit made you this dumb?
TRIGGER WARNING
try watching some Godard. He makes real intellectual films
>>63576391
>He makes real intellectual films
Which one of his Marxist films is your favorite?
>>63576391
>>63576419
hug and make up you two :)
>>63576419
Does socialism trigger you too? Are you a /pol/ poster? I feel like you're on the verge of ranting about 'degeneracy'.
La chinoise
>>63575281
Oхyeнный фильм
>>63576484
Is being an atheist and materialist Marxist the reason why you dismiss Christian filmmakers like Tarkovsky and Malick?
>>63576539
>implying you must share the religious and political beliefs of someone before you can like their art
you realize bazin was one of Godard's biggest inspirations?
did you throw away you'd Bergman Criterion blu rays when you found out he was atheist?
Is this good? It looks like fedora shit but I usually like Guy Maddin.
>>63576642
Bergman seems like a strange atheist to have signed off all his scripts with the phrase "Soli deo gloria".
>>63576730
>Udo Kier
I'd watch it
>>63576642
>atheist
actually the he was agnostic
the correct technical term is agnosticism
you retard
>>63576763
>literally make multiple films about losing your faith
>/pol/ neo Nazis still convince themselves otherwise
lol my dude, life will be a lot easier once you stop worrying about such irrelevant things
>>63576922
>>literally make multiple films about losing your faith
Which ones? All his religious movies deal more with the ambiguity of faith, rather than any complete rejection or acceptance. Like this guy said >>63576844, Bergman's movies are usually agnostic. But they still carry a strong Christian existential element not unlike the films of Malick and Tarkovsky, the latter even praising Bergman as one of the few of his contemporaries who made great movies.
