Is he the most talented living director?
No, Coen brothers are currently the best
>>63450473
it's the Coens, then Steve McQueen and David Fincher a little behind.
>>63450089
Goddard is still alive
>>63450498
>Steve McQueen
>>63450498
McQueen is quite a fantastic director, is Hunger a film worth watching? haven't seen it yet
>>63450600
One good movie
>>63450600
>Goddard
Please, plebs all heil the savior of cinema
>>63450498
>it's the Coens, then Steve McQueen and David Fincher a little behind.
Yes, The IMDB hack league. May as well have mentioned Nichols and Tarantino for how much of a juvenile redditor cunt you've made yourself look already.
Anybody praises McQueen and it's instantly like "Here's a man who has never shed blood for cinema". An instant red flag for the "film buff".
>>63450498
I know this board is full-on reddit neo-"cinephile", but jesus christ
>>63450645
Did you see them all? Which one are you talking bout?
>>63450684
>Insults without providing his own list
fuck off to some other board, shitposter.
What about Martin Scorsese you fucking plebs
>Hackarritu
>good
reddit just won't quite shitting up the board
>>63450089
he's the most talented mexican director, yes
>>63450089
Amores perros is absolutely amazing and a personal favourite, and Birdman was one of last year's best, biutiful was really good, 21 grams as well. But I'm afraid I'm going to have to tell you that The Revenant is going to suck something awfull.
And I have not seen that 9/11 film and Babel.
>>63450921
>posts marty
>calls other people plebs
mamma mia!
>>63450938
no.
>>63450600
>Goddard
Pedro Costa
Wang Bing
Tsai Ming-Liang
Carlos Reygadas
Michael Haneke
Béla Tarr (although retired)
Lav Diaz
Godard
Jonas Mekas
Nuri Bilge Ceylan
These area all way better and off the top of my head
>>63450921
Hasn't made a good film since 1999.
>>63450825
He's right though, mass appeal=/=most talented
>>63450921
Scorcese died artistically after the release of The King Of Comedy. Everything after that classic is just part of the death throws of a hack.
>>63450954
>>63450961
>unsubstantial shitposts
Posts directors yourselves, or at least back your opinion.
>>63450089
hey I love this guy. he's fucking based, especially in interviews.
>it'z only smellz
>plsss, make me nasty…make me nasty, I luvva nasty, cmon…Ima nasty boy
>plis dun crie
>u test ur ass?
>ooo yeah, vy do u make my deek so hard?
>u r so fuckin pretty to me ahhh…beautiful…beautiful to me ahhh
>don’t take off now because I enjoy too much!
>it’s naht bloody, but it’s a little broken…
>u like when Rocco phuck u, velly strung?
>u take all the way inside bitch…
>vat is going on…with u…ahhh so much make me cum…
>imagine ur father if he see dis movie
>this is really incredible nasty…
>you shud not hiv told me ur father wash my porno
>ooo, wrung hole...niccce
>>63450962
but they don't make reddit friendly middle-brow Oscar schlock, so they can't actually be that good!
>>63451001
Goddard isn't a filmmaker he's a rocket scientist.
>>63450498still better than this spic in OP though
>>63451012
he's a fucking legend!
>>63450997
>Last Temptation of Christ
>Goodfellas
>Cape Fear
Scorese turned to shit around the turn of the millennium.
>>63451075
Goodfellas and Cape Fear are absolutely terrible movies.
Kieslowski died too young
Until Scorsese dies you can't convince me there's anyone better, but yes, Inarritu is damn good. David Fincher also really interests me. He's a real auteur director, in the original definition of the word. He doesn't have this obsessive vision that overrides all sense and good taste, like Tarantino, but he has an extremely distinct, purposeful style, and he brings it to any project he works on. He's not very creative, but he's intensely good at his craft.
But that does highlight how absurd the idea of a "most talented director" is. Directorial styles and disciplines are so hugely varied, how can you compare anyone? I think Gareth Evans is a phenomenal martial arts action director, but how can you say that his skill at creating the most brutal, inventive fight scenes of the last decade is better or worse than Paul Thomas Anderson's ability to wring emotion and tension out of every single layer of a shot?
>>63451115
He was already retired. He finished his work and went back to his home planet.
>>63451134
>Until Scorsese dies you can't convince me there's anyone better
No one can convince you to have better taste, you have to develop it.
>>63451134
>He's a real auteur director, in the original definition of the word.
Thank you for understanding this. I see so many idiots here saying Fincher isn't an auteur because he doesn't write his own scripts, completely missing the point Cahiers was making about auteurism 50 years ago
>>63451107
Nah. They aren't on the level of Taxi Driver or King of Comedy, but they are still good films.
>>63451235
*movies
Am I the only person that thinks this is Scorsese's best film?
>>63450997
So sadly true.
Not even the best spic director
>>63451256
Don't do that.
>>63450962
>Obscure director who only a niche crowd knows so they must be good because my fedora needs to be tipped
>>63450997
I get where you're coming from but why cut off Last Temptation?
>>63451235
By the standards of whatever garbage hollywood is pumping out then sure, whatever I don't care. Like pointing to a mediocre hamburger and then giving it the faint praise of it being better than all the hamburgers prepared by literal down's syndromes. I'm still not going to eat it.
Goodfellas may look good next to Norbit and Titanic but it does not stand in the leagues of the art auteur elite. Hence the claim that he was artistically dead since KoC. Maybe he can shovel out better "entertainment" product than his peers still, but he is certainly no relevant artist.
>>63451316
Because Scorsese himself said it was shit and could've done a better job on it
>>63451269
It was one of Ebert's favorites.
>>63451298
>good directors need to be popular among the masses in order to not offend anyone that doesn't know about them
I'd say hello reddit, but this post is almost tumblr
>>63450962
>Mekas is still alive
The conspiracy of homosexuals wasn't that effective
>>63451181
He was going to adapt the Divine Comedy
Would have been amazing
>>63451298
None of those directors are obscure if you went down a list of people who won major film festival awards in the last 5 years.
>>63450089
no, but he's the only one who seems to know what he's doing.
>>63451298
"I don't know what this is so instead of looking it up I'll call you a pretentious faggot"
>>63451429
Birdman and The Revenant are two of the worst films of the decade so far though.
>>63451355
I don't get it
>>63451451
>The Revenant
Hasn't come out.
>Birdman
>Worst of the decade
You literally underestimate how many shitty movies are released in a year.
>>63450634
it's excellent, incredibly detached and very balanced. in some ways it's unique in its approach to a real-life series of events in that it neither feels like a documentary nor a traditional movie.
>>63451412
>major film festival awards
Hilarious how some of you guys are bagging on some directors who have won Oscars yet defend other who have some similiar awards.
>>63450684
>>63450685
>>63451032
oh you guys :DDD
>>63451513
I saw every movie released by a major studio last year. Birdman was the most artistically fraudulent.
>>63451526
They really aren't that similar. Festival awards are given by a small, rotating jury of peers, the Academy is hundreds of old men who produced a movie once 30 years ago and still get to vote, so the winners are much more populist. Plus festival jurors actually have to watch the films before voting.
>>63451549
And The Revenant? Was that just a shot in the dark?
>>63451549
Birdman is literally "suck SAGs cock: the film"
>>63451513
you literally overestimate shitposts
>>63451526
Stop embarrassing yourself
>>63451526
Film festivals and the Academy awards have nothing to do with each other.
It's like comparing Cannes to the MTV teen choice awards
>>63451581
>mentions the fact they are old and they are men as if that's a bad thing
Hello tumblr, I agree, movies should be voted on by a diverse group of black transgender womyn.
>>63451526
yeah cause all awards ceremonies are exactly the same mate. of course most of them are stupid but the Oscars are egregiously awful. voted for mostly by shitty Hollywood actors, directors, crew, and then a bunch of 80 year old men who have the shittiest taste in film imaginable. the Oscars are a complete joke. that being said the winners at Cannes the last few years have often been shit too but no, not all ceremonies are the same.
>>63451619
If you consider the Oscars to be in any way a respectable way to determine the quality of a film you are completely uneducated and most likely 16
>>63451619
Here's your last (you) from me, redditor
>>63451619
>Let me just latch on to one detail of the post and shift the conversation because I've been utterly BTFO on how awful the Oscar selection process is compared to real film awards
>>63451581
>>63451607
>>63451615
>>63451634
I think I've found the trigger
>>63451583
>DiCraprio and other meme actors
>Meme cinematographer doing his usually gimmick shit
>muh manly wilderness crap
Okay, that was a prediction, but honestly there is literally no way that it isn't going to be absolutely terrible. Just more "spectacle" "event" oscar baiting dogshit like Gravity.
>>63451619
>mentioning facts means i'm implying facts are sexist
They are predominantly old men, its silly to think that doesn't skew the voting somewhat. Add in that most don't work in the film industry anymore and there's no way to see if they actually watched any of the movies (see every anecdote of people voting without watching) and there's little reason to give their opinions anymore credibility than a strawpoll on /tv/.
Well, I've been lurking and I think I found the right thread for this question,
I'm in the market for a new fedora, could any of you gentlemen recommend me one?
>>63451659
le master trole
>>63451681
>meme
>meme
>muh
None of that actually means anything.
>>63451654
More respectable than the san francisco kekold arthouse awards that award the latest LGBT issues movie with their stupid meme leaves to be plastered all over the poster.
If anybody is going to be judging a film they should be straight white and male.
>meme
>>63451730
cool
>>63451730
>stupid meme leaves
You can tell who they are marketing towards when they have those leaves on the poster and these clowns are bagging on guys who have Oscars.
>>63451719
If you were fully ideologically bonded with the authentic /tv/ sensibilities those "buzzwords" would say all that ever needed to be said on the matter. That's why no matter how many crossposters complain they will ever stop being used. The only people who don't understand the deeper meanings on a gut level are crossposter sensibility tourists who don't deserve to know in the first place.
>>63451743
Meant for >>63451681
>>63451486
>>63451730
Arthouse and LGBT has literally nothing to do with each other. How did you even make that comparison you fucking retard?
>>63451777
>If you were fully ideologically bonded with the authentic /tv/ sensibilities
So am I, for you.
>>63451681
I wholeheartedly agree that The Revenant is probably going to garbage, but I think Lubezki is pretty good.
>>63451807
Wrong. If it has superheros and explosions it goes to the mainstream cinema. If it has blacks and trannies it plays at the arthouse.
>>63451807
His first foreign film was probably Blue is the warmest color. Just stop replying to these people
>>63451807
>Arthouse
They were the people who last year got first dibs on showing Birdman and Boyhood and this year it's the same with Carol, Room, Spotlight etc. It literally makes very little difference. This isn't the 50s anymore
>>63451843
What about black superheroes?
>>63451843
I forgot that Tyler Perry movies are arthouse
That isn't hayao miyazaki. Call me when alejandro enchilada has created a dozen of the best movies ever made.
>>63451730
>If anybody is going to be judging a film they should be straight white and male.
Many of the greatest and most influential filmmakers in history were not white or straight.
Who are you exactly to determine something like that?
>>63451890
Okay then. If it's a black people movie made for black people it plays at the mainstream cinema. If it's a black people movie for white people it plays at the arthouse.
>>63451859
What do you mean dibs? Its about marketing and building hype before expanding wide. Specialty theaters play smaller/indie/foreign films, and if they do well the big theaters stop showing Iron Man 9 on one screen in hopes something like Carol makes money
>>63451859
>Birdman
>Boyhood
>Arthouse
wow
>>63451890
Kek
>>63451107
>goodfellas
>terrible movie
nice meme there bucko
>>63451924
>If it's a black people movie for white people it plays at the arthouse.
Dear White People is arthouse?
>>63450684
KORINEFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAG!
>>63451896
Neither did Miyazaki
>>63451920
>Many of the greatest and most influential filmmakers in history were not white or straight.
Get fucked. These "minority" film makers were praised by liberals pushing an agenda, put them next to any decent straight white male director and they'd get blown the fuck out. Go ahead name your kekold shit and your weeb shit so we can get it over with.
This a white medium whether you like it or not.
Any anwser other than refn is LITERALLY reddit
>>63450089
He pretty much looks like how I picture the devil
>>63451936
>implying Arthouse theaters didn't show Boyhood or Birdman
I know they were in English, but come on, it's the year 2015
>>63451957
As far as arthouse cinemas are concerned, yes. It doesn't have to be art to be "arthouse". It just needs to push a leftist agenda and NOT have explosions.
>>63450600
Inauthentic cinema
>>63451947
In the pantheon of cinema, yes it's pretty fucking bad. The fact that it entertains those with the sensibilities of 16-20 year olds is no defense of it. If anything that's the ultimate damnation.
>>63450921
Last good movie he did was The Aviator, and even that film wasn't objectively very good.
>>63450089
No, because all of the following are still alive:
Kenneth Anger
Chen Kaige
Larry Cohen
Monte Hellman
Hou Hsiao-Hsien
Jerry Lewis
Michael Mann
Jacques Rivette
Michael Snow
Aleksandr Sokurov
Jean-Marie Straub
Bela Tarr
Johnnie To
Jean-Luc Godard
Abbas Kiarostami
Claude Lanzmann
Werner Herzog
Amos Gitai
Lars von Trier
>>63452007
You're confusing indie with arthouse, idiot.
Wes Anderson is also arthouse in your opinion because his movies don't have superheroes, explosions, blacks or trannies.
>It doesn't have to be art to be "arthouse".
Of course, I also forgot it's not a house!
>>63452009
>Inauthentic
Explain, don't just go tossing around your baseless opinion like it means something
>>63451777
Meanwhile all the other boards hate our crossposters the most.
>>63452039
but anon, isn't clarity a sign of good filmmaking? I would think that a movie that can be understood by a wide range of people would be a positive, since that means that its ideas are presented in a way that isn't obtuse or pedantic.
>>63450089
Fucking Quentin Tarantino is alive you fucking plebs, what's wrong with you all?
>>63452066
I'm going from my personal experience here but in my city the new Wes Anderson film is absolutely more likely to show at the small arthouse cinemas than the mainstram cinemas.
>>63451962
Pier Paolo Pasolini
Derek Jarman
Ozu (allegedly)
Murnaw (allegedly)
Kenneth Anger
Marcel Carné
Fassbinder
Sergei Parajanov
Norman McLaren
>>63452117
>I would think that a movie that can be understood by a wide range of people would be a positive, since that means that its ideas are presented in a way that isn't obtuse or pedantic.
That's why commercials are the highest form of art, right?
>>63451959
no effort/10
>>63452057
This
>>63452117
>I would think that a movie that can be understood by a wide range of people would be a positive
No that's the opposite of good film making. The best of cinema has only be appreciate with the elite, those with decades of cinematic training. This cinema leaves the unqualified bored, antagonized and confused. The more a film enables low cinema IQ viewers the worse the art is. If a film is enjoyed by 16 year olds just getting into taking the medium seriously then that alone disqualifies it from being quality art.
He's not even in the top 50
But what about me?
>>63451962
Japan has a better film industry than most Western nations, but you'll just deny that.
Hong Kong filmmakers like Johnnie To have made some of best action films, so it's not just something pushed by "liberals" because you don't need those sensibilities to enjoy someone getting kicked in the face.
Abbas Kiarostami is undoubtedly one of the most interesting filmmakers ever.
>>63452162
I said that clarity is A positive, not THE defining feature to a good film. All I'm arguing is that it can be interpreted as a good thing that a movie can be understood by many people.
>>63452161
All worthless next to the work of any good straight director. Maybe the work of these degenerates seems inappropriately impressive to you because you are gay yourself?
>>63452130
>mfw Grand Budapest Hotel played for about a month at my local Regal multiplex that also screens Bollywood movies
I live in a weird place where the other Regal at the mall plays predominantly indie films
>>63452174
Porco Rosso is his only good movie
Only Yesterday is pretty great but he didn't direct it I believe
The Zog is still alive.
>Aguirre
>Fitzcarraldo
>The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser
>Stroszek
>Woyzeck
>Nosferatu the Vampyre
>Lessons of Darkness
>Grizzly Man
>Cave of Forgotten Dreams
>Encounters at the End of the World
>Heart of Glass
>Cobra Verde
Show me a better filmography than that.
>>63452209
>All I'm arguing is that it can be interpreted as a good thing
Sure, it can. You're not saying shit, though
>>63452229
Tell me a director you like
>>63452229
Don't be so upset that great art can be produced by men who like it up the bunghole
>>63452286
Kubrick
>>63452286
Why are you arguing with a troll? Just move on.
>>63452229
Why are you obsessed with straight men? Do you google the director's sexuality before watching a film? Do you have a fetish or something?
>>63452304
7/10 made me reply
>>63452232
>his only good movie
nigga, all his movies are good movies, except maybe ponyo but even that's still a beautiful mess that's leagues ahead of most movies. plus he wrote the screenplay for Whisper of the Heart, which many think is the best ghibli film.
>>63452057
But how of them are currently making anything?
>>63452253
>sure it can
glad you agree with me.
>>63450089
scary
>>63452320
>Do you google the director's sexuality before watching a film?
Erm, yes? It's completely normal to read up on the director of the film before you watch it. Race, gender and sexuality are key points when deciding which movie to watch.
Sometimes if I see a movie involuntarily like if it started on TV or a friend puts it on I'll have to check afterwards but I always read into the people who made the films I consume. Being gay, female or a racial minority is a big red flag for a garbage film.
>>63451602
Pretty much, yeah.
>>63452368
I counted nine who are currently making films - not sure about the others
>>63452391
Wanna hold hands?
>>63452416
;)
M A L I C K
A L I C K M
L I C K M A
I C K M A L
C K M A L I
K M A L I C
>>63452469
>L I C K M A
>>63452416
>racial minority
what a fucking absurd concept. just say non-white, because that's what you actually mean.
the director of the Tekkonkinkreet film, Michael Arias, is white but lives and works in japan. would you not watch his film (just based on who the director is) because he's a minority in Japan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tekkonkinkreet
The only thing missing in this thread is that copypasta with those directors written in some asian character.
>>63452416
>It's completely normal to read up on the director of the film before you watch it
only if you're an uptight twat
>>63452544
Racial minority and non-white are interchangable terms.
>would you not watch his film (just based on who the director is) because he's a minority in Japan?
I wouldn't refuse to watch his film because he is a minority in japan, I'd refuse to watch his film because he'd have to be a leftist kekold to leave his white homeland to live with subhumans.
>>63451730
Pathetic. Even if there were an award ceremony with that name, there'd be a good chance it'd award better movies than the Academy.
If you think the Academy awards anything other than mediocre middle brow at best movies, you've failed at watching movies, and should either shut your kuckhole until your aren't a raging pleb, or just go back to /v/.
>>63452416
Do you cover your eyes every time you see a picture of the Mona Lisa?
>>63452626
back to /pol/ with you
>>63452619
Well if you take art seriously you should be an "uptight twat" in the eyes of the film casual. And if you don't take art seriously you have no place on this board.
>>63452629
>it'd award better movies than the Academy.
>>63452629
>Even if there were an award ceremony with that name, there'd be a good chance it'd award better movies than the Academy.
Back to tumblr. I'd take bland oscar bait from some aging hollywood director than some indie shit about a tranny filmed in a donut shop on an iphone.
>>63452242
But dude, Steve McQueen gets Michael Fassbender to scream and cry and act real EMOTIONAL, with long shots, so his moovies have to be good, right?
>>63452653
You go back to reddit. Every word expressed in that post is in line with the authentic /tv/ sensibilities and has nothing to do with /pol/.
he is a hack peddling immaculate "pity porn" art mimicry to people with a desperate desire to feel "human"
>>63452654
>>63452654
>if you don't take art seriously you have no place on this board
said without irony
>>63452760
I guess he missed all the star wars threads
>>63452760
If you don't sincerely believe that statement then just fuck off. No place for video game degenerates who only come here to watch the flavor of the month and post the dank capeshit memes and would not shed a single drop of their blood for the medium. I'd kill for film and so should every other person on this board.
>>63452654
If you take art seriously you engage directly with the art instead of checking out the creator's wikipedia page firs
>>63452193
I'm not that guy, but being this certain that you're so incredibly intelligent is a pretty big sign of a lack of intelligence. You seem unable to question yourself, and beyond certain about the fact that you're part of an elite group of people, destined to greater things and allowed a deeper understanding of the world itself.
I don't disagree that most people are retarded, but I'm not stupid enough to discard the possibility that I my self might be retarded.
>>63452229
Good god man. Just admit your homosexuality to yourself.
>>63452839
I will not ever debase myself with the work of my cultural enemies. If it's made by a gay, a black or a woman then it's not fucking art.
Art is a white concept. Not of these groups are white by my standards.
>>63452881
Are asians white?
>>63452842
I am not yet part of the elite but that is the ideal I strive towards with every decision I make. At my current level I can appreciate the lower high level auteur but I am confident that the real great cinematic masterpieces will become known to me as I climb the ranks.
>>63452416
Now this is some grade A quality bait!
>>63452900
Fucking no. Straight (genetic) white males that do not enable the actions of non-whites or any non-white sympathizer groups are the only people on the planet still "white" culturally.
>>63452942
the funniest thing is that it's not even bait - this makes it the perfect bait
>>63452716
:^)
>>63452881
Are you American? If so, I have some bad news for you man...
>>63450089
>most talented living director
>OF COURSE iTS MEXiCAN MASTER RACE
thread.
>>63453071
There are literally no good mexican directors.
>>63453071
thread x1
>>63452716
said just like a true /pol/lack
>>63453090
Inarritu
Cuaron
Del Toro
>>63452938
Heh! He-he. Funniii
>>63453134
you took the bait, didn't you?
>>63453134
Yeah, those were exactly the 3 hacks I had in mind when I made that statement.
>>63453090
are all those oscars fake then?
>>63453155
No, the hack statues are real.
>>63453154
Yeah, they're such hacks that no one but cinephiles knows who they are.
>>63453185
Any 16 year old who "went to flicks" knows who they are and adores them.
The entry level "film buffs" that champion these IMDB sensibility directors are one of the biggest threats this art medium is facing.
>>63453154
>>63453185
I am the only great Mexican director, but nobody knows me yet.
>>63453175
mfw americans are butthurt over mexican's for being better director's, and having more vision
>>63453288
I like the Mexicans but I think the Italian directors better.
Not even a single mention of Malick lmao
Should just rename this board to Superhero movies and entry level kiddos. Didn't even bother reading after the first few responses lmao.
>>63453309
you missed some hilarious shit
>>63453250
Someday. Someday you'll be a great leader of meheeco
>>63453309
Malick built his artistic tomb with To The Wonder and then sealed it with Knight Of Cups.
>>63453309
you drop this ma' sir
>>63453339
To The Wonder was still better than 99% of movies nowadays and Im sure Knight of Cups will be too
>>63453354
>>>/r/eddit
>>63453309
Malick went to shit after Badlands
The Thin Red Line is fucking awful
>>63452881
This is the funniest shit I ever read. But where do you fall on Leni Riefenstahl? Art or not?
Malick is a fat fuck.
>>63450962
>Tsai Ming-liang
>not HHH or Edward Yang
Taiwanese cinema's always been a huge pile of shit, might as well pick a director whose shit smells the least.
>>63453403
>went to shit after his first movie
what a retard. days of heaven was better, and it wasn't even his best.
>>63450661
>>63450600
>>63451001
>Goddard
>Not a hack
Werner Herzog is more talented than he is.
There's not even one good living director
>>63453444
nevermind, I missed "currently living", scratch Yang then but Hou is still alive even though he hasn't made a movie worth anything since 2003
>>63450089
He's good. I'm looking forward to whatever he may do next. The Revenant looks pretty good.
>>63450600
Godard: Biggest try-hard in film. Most plastic shit masquerading as art.
>>63450600
>praising the hack behind World War Z and TDKR
>>63453416
not him but I think Riefenstahl is criminally underseen, The Blue Light is one of the best classic German films ever made, in my opinion.
>>63452242
I refuse to watch Cave of Forgotten Dreams until I can find a cinema showing it in 3D, or somehow afford to buy a 3D TV.
>Not watching a film as the director intends it
Also, Fitzcarraldo is his magnum opus.
>>63453475
This daysoo zenpie. I only watch films if at least 75% of the people involved are died.
>>63453828
"I think there’s nothing wrong with being fixated on superheroes when you are seven years old, but I think there’s a disease in not growing up.
The enormous sums of money to be made on superhero movies are drying up the streams of financing as well as the prospect for distribution of lower-budget non-action films.
They have been poison, this cultural genocide, because the audience is so overexposed to plot and explosions and shit that doesn’t mean nothing about the experience of being human."
What did he mean by this?
>>63453875
Isn't it perfectly clear?
>>63453875
"if I talk shit about super hero movies, it will help sell my one-note hamfisted melodramas as ART!"
That's what Hackarriittuu meant.
>>63453458
>>63453497
Hey look, more unsubstantial shitposts...
>>63453532
what?
>>63453875
Brave words from someone whose upcoming film costs a bit more than half a superhero movie, still way out of the range of most oh-so-indie filmmakers.
>>63454039
He went 40 million dollars over budget on Revenant
>>63453970
You stupid or something?
>>63454082
I didn't even know that, hah, awesome.
>>63454116
no, I'm capable of seeing pseudo-art for what it is. You know, the shit the Mexi-hacks peddle to fedoras and casuals.
>>63454232
so many buzzwords in one post...
>>63454232
Yet you're defending capeshit
>>63453444
Tsai Ming Liang is amazing and HHH went to shit
>>63453991
>>63453532
A reminder that>>63450600 probably meant Jean-Luc Godard. Not Drew Goddard...
>>63454189
The budget when they went into production was $95 million, and it cost around $135 million.
Shooting all natural light in the middle of winter, when you have about 4 hours - and trying to do elaborate tracking shots in the snow. When the warm weather rolled around and they lost the snow in Canada, they had to go find it in the southern hemisphere.
>>63454257
Nice reading comprehension. None of these posts defended capeshit. They all criticized Hackarritu.
No wonder you think Birdman is remarkable. You have trouble with simple English.
I hate Inarritu so fucking much that bean munching hack fraud. I swear it's this man who pushed me over the edge and made me pull the trigger on backing Trump. Whenever I have any doubts I just imagine this smug fuck shitting into a taco with a look on his face just like the OP image and then all of the critics and redditors eat it up and say "'c'est magnifique" and hand him another oscar.
FUCK THIS SPIC.
>>63450089
>Malick
>Jorodowsky
>Costa
>Lynch
>Godard
>Mekas
>Vinterberg
>Linklater
>Coens
>Fukanaga
Not really fám
>>63454352
>No wonder you think Birdman is remarkable
I never said that, sounds like you're the one with a comprehension problem.
>>63451269
its a great film and his most underrated
>>63453991
>>63454342
tricked
>>63454324
He did go to shit recently but he still made loads of great stuff. About Ming-liang, that's mostly just me, I've seen The River and Goodbye Dragon Inn and I hated every minute of both. What else of his would you recommend to try and appreciate?
>>63450089
Is that the man in black?
>>63454415
>>Vinterberg
>>Linklater
>>Coens
>>Fukanaga
Started strong but your list gradually descended into IMDB movie buff trash. I'd kill Linklater on sight and so should anybody else who cares about the art of cinema.
You all have bad taste. Haneke is alive.
>>63454452
Oh, don't do that. Don't pretend that you're not an idiot who thinks he meant Drew Goddard.
>>63454496
>IMDB movie buff trash
I tend to ignore everyone that uses these kind of buzzwords, if everyone did the same this would be a much better place. You're the same as people that ignore directors that are too 'pretentious', instead you ignore them because they're too 'IMDB'
>Linklater
>bad
A Scanner Darkly is the best sci-fi film of the last 10 years.
Based on this anthologic thread, everybody who ever made a film is LITERALLY a hack and all his films are shit and inauthentic garbage. Nice.
Contrary to the idea of being any of the boogeymen, the thing that /tv/ hates mostis actually itself
>>63454480
I'm gonna come off really pretentious but I think that you should see his work chronologically, starting with Rebels of the Neon God. As you may know all his movies have the same actor and watching him grow on film conveys the human condition aspects of Ming-Liang's work. It can be really interesting and imaginative at times
>>63454669
>A Scanner Darkly is the best sci-fi film of the last 10 years.
It's not bad honestly, but I don't give Linklater too much credit since he was working with great source material. Upstream Color is better.
Me and Orson Welles, Bernie, Boyhood and Before Midnight on the otherhand are among the worst films of the decade. Also the IMDB sensibilities are a very real threat. If only they were just a buzzword.
>>63454768
The Before trilogy is the only decent thing he ever did
>>63454759
I see. Well, I'll try and check out Rebels when I find the time. Thanks.
![240956-asghar-farhadi[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hIkB3ar.jpg "240956-asghar-farhadi[1].jpg")
He's no Asghar Farhadi
>>63454768
>Me and Orson Welles, Bernie, Boyhood and Before Midnight on the otherhand are among the worst films of the decade
Are you insane?
>Also the IMDB sensibilities are a very real threat
What threat? To whom?
>>63450962
>all these literally who's
>>63454810
I hate those films and anybody who likes them.
>>63454820
okay, this is it. Every single talentless hack working today has been mentioned.
Good night.
>>63454824
>What threat? To whom?
The cinematic landscape. The art of this medium. They herald lowering standards. The celebration of the meme of quality and ignorant of the real thing.
>>63454827
literally pleb
>>63452039
>>63454873
what would you define as iMDB sensibilities? genuinely curious
STOP SHITPOSTING
>>63454768
>It's not bad honestly, but I don't give Linklater too much credit since he was working with great source material.
He absolutely deservers the credit, adapting PKD as well as he did must be a pain in the ass.
>Upstream Color is better
Haven't seen it yet to be honest.
But if you really think Boyhood is one the worst films of the decade you're too far gone to have a decent conversation about film-
ITT: Nu-uh cuz these foreign guys i googled are alive. that'll show you how partican i am
>>63452193
>I don't know what I'm talking about
>>63454890
The pedestrian memes of prestige, quality and entertainment as accepted by the unsophisticated film casual.
>>63453394
you must be joking
>>63454911
Ethan Hawke is the sole redeeming quality of Boyhood. I love that man. He is in a lot of shit though, needs to stay away from Linklater and cheap horror movies.
>>63453309
But Malick is pure entry-level.
I don't know what /tv/ is though.
