Are you looking forward to her performance in TFA?
>>63358241
10/10 ass and feet
something about her face looks different to me when i see her in still shots.. but in TFA trailers she looks very qt.TFA is gonna suck balls, though
Yes, yes I am.
>>63358332
>tattoo on feet
>>63358241
nice shitbox
>>63358241
Nope, but I wanna fuck her.
she's quite the drinker
>>63358241
Define "performance".
>>63358408
wow, sofia vergara is looking fucking old these days
>>63358408
first time she's come off as QT to me.
love the candid look. too bad she's a terrible actress
>>63359165
Of or relating to the rear end.
>>63358241
>her performance
stick literally any bimbo in there and it would be just as bad as her
>>63358241
that one scene where she spreads ass to camera is pretty good
She looks bad in stills, cute in motion, stiff and terrible as an actress (worse than Portman in RotS kind of bad). But we have seen like 5 minutes of her in it so who knows.
But I kinda want to slap her for some reason.
>>63358241
if it werent for her foot tat, she would be a level 10 qt
>looking forward to anything related to TFA except for the endless board drowning ocean of shitposting that is to come
Nah.
>>63358408
Stupid bitch should have worn smaller heels.
>>63358387
It's because she's cinegenic.
Some people simply look better in films, than they do in stills or IRL.
It has to do with subtle facial movements that you don't notice.
>>63358387
It's the cinematography. Look at stills from the film trailer, and stills from other places.
She looks way different in both.
>>63359143
it was water, are you kidding me
