>Being a British guy in 2015 is not easy, and in this series Reggie Yates travels to the extreme edge of modern British masculinity to discover that 21st-century pressures are changing the way we live, the way we love and even the way we look.
>In the second film, Reggie meets the angry young British men who think feminism has gone too far - and some of the women who have felt their wrath on an internet tailor-made for anti-feminism and trolls. He meets young guys espousing men's rights at Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park and the underground movement of male separatists of MGTOW (or Men Going Their Own Way). Reggie also encounters infamous self-styled pick-up artist Roosh V, who dishes out advice on how to have more sex with women - but doesn't seem to like them very much.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06s5h18
>>63259210
BBC Three is a meme network along with their documentaries.
>Reggie also encounters infamous self-styled pick-up artist Roosh V
>>63259210
So happy this channel is ending next year, good riddance.
>>63259210
so what you're saying is that one or two reasonable people asking for mental health funding will be drowned in a sea of monstrous faggots.
FUCKING
NIGGERS
EVERYWHERE
Why do I have to look at some disguting coon 24/7? My country is 97% white or something like that and there are niggers literally everywhere. I fell asleep on the bus today and when I woke up I was looking at giant fucking nigress at some fashion ad. JUST FUCK OFF ALREADY WHO WANTS 30 SQUARE METERS OF CULTURAL ENRICHMENT.
>>63259651
Relax chum
What is it with Britbongs and their love for BBCs
>>63260586
Some people don't like being keked
>>63259210
>Reggie also encounters infamous self-styled pick-up artist Roosh V, who dishes out advice on how to have more sex with women - but doesn't seem to like them very much.
Why does shit like this get associated with men's issues?
>>63260674
well, that's how you defame something. associate it with universally despised assholes. roosh v and his whale-harpooning ilk are scumbags, so associating them with men's rights inherently shits all over any legitimate concerns. same thing gets done to socialists in america by associating them with stalin.
>>63259210
>BBC Three
DROPPED
R
O
P
P
E
D
>>63260819
>same thing gets done to socialists in america by associating them with stalin
Socialism is retarded though.
>>63259210
it doesn't sound like it's anti-feminism, anon
it sounds more like a Louis Theroux doc about MRA's
>>63260674
>>63260819
Roosh V has even said he's not an mra and doesn't support mras. When return of kings had their anti Mad Max article feminists blamed MRAs, even though RoK is anti-MRA and makes it known. Cracked did an article claiming to show misogyny on the /R/mensrights subreddit but every single quote they used came from TheRedPill. When Elliot Rodger happened feminists completely fabricated a story about him being an MRA.
Feminists do not have any actual criticisms against MRAs and as time goes on, more and more people and realizing that MRAs are right and feminists were wrong. Since feminists can't defend their own views or attack mra views, they just resort to making shit up to slander MRAs.
I wonder if the repeated lying from feminists about everything from MRAs to the wage gap to rape will be covered in this show...
>>63259651
Why do brits put niggers in everything? I stopped watching Dr. Who because last year's season was full of them. I just want to watch a British qt and a Scotsman flying around in a magic time machine without getting a faceful of bix nood.
>>63261002
It's not to make the 3% Black population happy, it's to make SJW/white guilt 10% of the 87% White population happy. Still 3x as many people pleased.
>>63260819
Roosh and his band of manchildren are infinitely better than the fedora tipping MRA's.
MRAs are the male equivalent of feminists; make stupid life decisions, get into legal/financial trouble to being too naive to prevent themselves from being exploited by opportunists and then blame others for not being able to look after themselves.
>>63259210
How does the establishment expect people to believe that feminism is fighting for the underdogs when the establishment shills for feminism so fucking hard?
>>63259210
His Russian shit was pretty based, probably the best thing to come out of three in a long while.
>>63260876
Fire Dept
Police
Roads
Public welfare safety net
Corporate welfare
The Military
The Weekend
>Socialism is retarded though.
No, that would be you.
>>63259210
>>63261688
>everything listed thrives in non-socialist countries
literally loving every laugh at your expense right now :')
>>63261884
>Too retarded to know what Socialism actually is
I bet you think Socialism is Communism, huh?
>>63260994
>Feminists do not have any actual criticisms against MRAs and as time goes on, more and more people and realizing that MRAs are right and feminists were wrong. Since feminists can't defend their own views or attack mra views, they just resort to making shit up to slander MRAs.
isn't the main criticism of MRAs that they try to trivialise feminism to undermine equal rights for women b/c they feel insecure about losing their position of power as men?
Not that men's rights aren't important of course! it just seems that MRAs spend more time attacking feminism rather than promoting fairer rights 4 fathers or addressing the male suicide rate etc. They'll bring them up in conversation, but only as a means of undermining feminism, very rarely actually trying to address the issues.
there are defo shitty people who are feminists who seem incapable of understanding that other groups are discriminated against, but there's a much larger proportion of MRAs who are awful people
>>63261964
>makes baseless assumptions even though nobody mentioned communism
butthurt, damage control or both? ;)
>>63259210
>He meets young guys espousing men's rights at Speakers' Corner in Hyde Park
To be honest I do fucking love speaker's corner. It's the only real freedom of speech place in the whole world.
>>63262115
>openly retarded opinions about Socialism
>baseless assumptions
Nah.
>>63261805
Hah
>BBC
>Main character is a black guy
poetry
>>63262178
>can't explain why socialism isn't retarded
>starts projecting more and more in each reply
top lel, citing a list is an argument these days. What a dweeb :^)
>>63262330
You still dancing?
>Sees a list of achievements brought about by Socialism
>denies self evident truths
>uses "projecting" buzzword
>calls others "Dweebs"
Fucking kekked.
>>63262112
The mens rights movement mostly started as a father's rights movement in the 60s. Second wave feminists were hugely anti-father so the biggest opponent of FRAs were feminists. When MRAs started advocating for recognition of male victims of rape or DV, again it was the feminists that opposed them because women can't be abusive and can't rape men (academic feminists still dont' consider it "rape" when a woman forces a man to have sex; men can only be raped if he's sodomized). Erin Pizzey founded the first shelter for abused women, but is an anti-feminist MRA because of how many feminists opposed her when she started raising awareness of male victims. Feminists are also generally opposed to any discussions of men's issues at all. Recently a male MP suggested having a discussion in Parliament on men's issues for International Men's Day, since they've had many discussions on women's issues but never talked about men's issues. Suicide was one of the issues he mentioned. A feminist MP called it laughable and said nobody should talk about men's issues until 50% of Parliament was women
That's always been how feminism has viewed men's rights. Criticizing MRAs for being anti-feminist is a recent thing, MRAs became anti-feminist in the first place because feminists opposed anything to do with men's issues, from father's rights to male victims of DV. And their main criticism of MRAs was simply that men were too privileged to have any real problems, and therefore were just whining about minor things. That, obviously, is becoming a less popular viewpoint so feminists have to change tactics. Which means lying and slander like claiming Eliot Rodger was an MRA.
MRAs do talk about fathers rights, suicide, police brutality, male victims of rape/DV, etc. But it is literally impossible to discuss those without being anti-feminist. I used to be more or less a feminist but I found feminists constantly trying to shut down any discussions of men's issues
>>63262944
>can't explain it so decides its "self evident"
>got his feelings triggered so is now complaining of buzzwords
>words that he doesn't understand are buzzwords too
>desperately posts pictures because he has no argument
Wew lad :^) you are actually embarrassing yourself :''')
>>63262112
>>63263061
(part 2) When feminists criticize MRAs for being anti-feminist, they try to imply that anti-feminist means anti-woman. But as explained above, MRAs have very legitimate reasons for being anti-feminist. Feminists know that once anybody actually looks into WHY mras are anti-feminist, nobody would believe MRAs are misogynists and instead would realize how shitty feminism has been to men. So they want to claim MRAs are misogynists, but can't actually point to examples of MRAs being misogynists because while there is plenty of anti-feminism, there is very little misogyny among MRAs. So instead they just find misogynistic non-MRAs, some like Roosh are even anti-MRA, and claim those are MRAs
>>63259277
feminism is a meme
>>63261002
You can't get funding for your movie or TV series in the UK unless you comply with at least one 1/3 being of a minority.
I don't know specifically for advertising or other items, but I'd wager it's related to corporate enforced levels of diversity.
http://www.bfi.org.uk/news-opinion/news-bfi/announcements/bfi-obligates-supports-lottery-funding-recipients-reflect-diversity-uk
>>63264209
From the article:
The three ticks assessment requires applicants to demonstrate commitment to diversity across three areas of their production, ranging from the make up of the workforce to the stories and characters on screen, with at least one tick needed in a minimum of two areas for a project to be eligible for BFI production funding:
On-screen diversity: diverse subject matter, at least one lead character positively reflecting diversity, at least 30% of supporting and background characters positively reflecting diversity;
Off-screen diversity: diverse key creatives (director, screenwriter, composer, cinematographer), at least two Heads of Department from diverse backgrounds, production crew and production company staff (both with a range of targets across different diverse groups);
Creating opportunities and promoting social mobility: paid internships and employment opportunities for new entrants from diverse backgrounds, training placements for people from diverse backgrounds, demonstrable opportunities for former trainees or interns to progress within their careers.
To support the introduction and implementation of the BFI’s new guidelines, a Diversity Expert will be recruited to support funded productions and provide guidance for the wider industry. In partnership with Pact, the BFI will hold a series of town hall events for UK producers to explain the three ticks approach and answer questions about its implementation, with the first of these set to take place in London on 23 July. The BFI is also committed to engaging the UK film sector to build consensus around the best ways to approach diversity industry-wide, to develop an action-plan for change right across the UK’s film industry value chain.
>>63261805
Doesn't that idiot know that pure breed dogs are genetic degenerates?
