Mr.Plinkett BTFO!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7yzTSuOkZeE
>>63187392
This is your channel right?
>>63187413
Maybe it is, maybe it's not. Regardless the maker has OWNED and DEBUNKED Plinkett.
>>63187392
Damn, he owned Plinkett so hard. Nice video mate!
>>63187392
Good video
turned out after 5 seconds. This faggot's voice makes me want to find him and shove a poker up his ass.
>>63187392
>One hour and 44 minutes
There is no way I am listening to some random neckbeard's personal opinions for over an hour. Anyone sum the shit up for me pls?
>>63187566
RLM defense force at full damage control.
TL;DW
Cliffnotes?
>>63187547
>>63187511
>>63187392
samefriend
>>63187392
>1:44:42
holy shit, no
I'm going to waste my time with something else.
>>63187392
Why did you disable comments
wooow, so owned.
>first point to discuss comes up
>video responds with "so what? is this affecting you? no!"
Dropped
>People actually literally non-ironically defend the prequels, especially episodes I and II
Literally HOW
>A finding a link to a youtube channel CHANGED YOUR LIFE FOR THE BETTER
Holy shit, literally stopped watching there. How can one man be such a kuck?
>>63187392
Holly shit RLM BTFO
RLM is finished
This video is not retarded at all
>>63187852
It really isn't any more retarded than RLM's original video
>>63187392
104 minutes of him saying "Dont like it,dont watch it" to Plinkett
this is the kind of autist that is not very smart
nothing to see here
>commentary to the commentary of a terrible movie
this shit is so autistic im actually gonna watch a bit of it for the cringefactor
>saganfan1983
Sounds like movieblob t(o)b(e)h(onest)
This shit is so retarded I'm actually considering making my own commentary over it to point out how much of a fucking idiot this guy is.
>>63187908
you might want to reconsider that opinion
a bit late 2bh
>>63187392
>Complains that the plinkett reviews are filled with nitpicking
>Jumps in and unsuccessfully nitpicks all his points
>>63188124
that autist would propably commentate over your commentary of his commentary commentating on plinketts commentary
>vocal fry
>talks like a man child
>likes blabbering about nothing
>puts EMPHASIS on a different WORDS because he BELIEVES this creates a sense of URGENCY
>when I think about how this guy probably likes hearing himself talk it makes me feel sorry for his family
>star trek reference because you're a dumb nerd
>responds to jokes, wasting everyone's time
>first argument is aimed at rlm wanting a more neat and clear-cut story arc for a family adventure movie, this is clearly wrong because star trek is convoluted and awful so therefore the new star wars movies should be convoluted and awful
great video
>I am a Star Trek fan and I am against bullying
>http://www.trekkersagainstbullying.com
What's going ON here?
>>63187392
>Random spot
>43:04
Into the trash it goes
>>63188162
>>Complains that the plinkett reviews are filled with nitpicking
>plinketts first points he tries to debunk are that the characters are stale and the story cant build any tension
yeah thats just useless nitpicking, who needs relatable characters
he made a 1h45m response video to a several years old partially ironic nitpicking review of a star wars prequel.
>>63187392
It's shit.
This is a shill thread and you're a faggot.
Jesus Christ everything aside at least RLM can create an engaging hour-30 video with jokes along the way. This guy just talks into his $10 safeway microphone and puts a cringey clip of a star trek character looking annoyed before he makes every one of his points. It's fucking garbage to the point where I can't even begin to process his probably shitty points.
Nice same fagging
I got about 8 mins in before i turned it off, your either retarded , a shit troll or autistic.im guessing the later
>>63188342
>your
>.im
>the later
Nice irony fagget
>34 posts
>22 IPs
>>63187392
You know Plinkett nitpicks on purpose right? He even makes fun of how nitpicky he is in his other reviews like his very first one
>>63188396
i wonder who could be behind these posts
>>63188321
The rml review are very self aware and refer to the fack that theu nitpick, but i think this guy doesn't understand the joke.
It still doesn't thake away the fact that the films suck
>>63188430
>h-he being stupid on purpose!
>>63188342
>8 mins in
and he hasn't even started
>>63187392
Sounds like an autistic Chris Bores
>its a snarky youtuber picks apart an argument episode
>>63187392
>my face when not a SINGLE RLM fanboy KUCK has ever successfully refuted this review
Patreon creeps and redditors confirmed on suicide watch
>>63188720
BASED
A
SEPARATION
E
D
>Plinkett brings up valid points
>responds with 'fucking nitpicking!!!!'
confirmed autism
>>63188524
Yeah it's stupid on purpose
Why bother making and editing a 2 hour long review of a movie that came out like 15 years ago? On top of that who would even watch that? On top of that who would bother making a 2 hour review of the 2 hour review?
Get a life nerd
>>63187392
>101 views
>comments disabled
JUST
>>63188800
>i-it's okay when Plinkett does it!!
>>63187392
>criticizes another youtube content creator
>shuts down comments so anons cant criticize him
>>63187392
is it autism?
>film doesn't need protagonist cuz kirk/spock/mccoy
>stop focusing on muh linear storytelling
but plinkett already said it doesn't apply to every film. plus isn't kirk usually the main character in star trek stuff? (i've only seen wrath of khan so i'm not positive)
>>63187392
That's heavy autism, even for /tv/ standards.
Where is that Holiday Special instasync guy?
He should stream this stupid video
>Muh Sheev was manipulating everyone.
>Citing apologist fan-explanations from Wookieepedia that were never shown through story, script, characterisation, camerawork, etc.
You make me sick
>>63187392
>for my avatar I've selected the colo claw fish
COLOKIN ARE PEOPLE TOO
>>63190902
I'm willing to bet that he obsessed over that shit when he was in elementary school
>HEY GUYS WANNA PLAY STAR WARS I'LL BE THE COLO CLAW FISH
>No one wants to be friends with him
You see all those awful sketches of it peppered throughout the video? He probably drew those himself.
BLADE
57
HRC
>>63191039
I just got to the part around 29 minutes where he makes fun of plinkett for putting pizza rolls in an envelope and explains how it'd damage the other mail.
I think it's actually autism.
>>63191039
>>63190902
Prequel autists obsessed with characters nobody but them likes are something all of their own
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZS13ZZIef0
oh my god, what is wrong with the person who made this? literal autism
>>63191328
https://www.youtube.com/user/Kwehchan/videos
HAHAHAHAHHAHAH oh shit jesus fuck.
>look at his other plinkett bashing video
>he thinks mike makes the animated plinkett shorts
kek
>>63191506
Holy shit it's Jawsus
That's a blast from the fucking past
>>63191554
>he thinks mike makes the animated plinkett shorts
Who DOES do those?
Like, they're not funny at all, or well animated, and they just seem to be animations for pre-existing stuff from reviews and skits
Did Mike feel bad for some child animator who was dying of cancer or something, and allowed him to put stuff on his website?
>>63191566
>the past
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JykNriaHA5k
This is perhaps my favorite thing to come out of RLM since Plinkett vids themselves
>I am quite offended by your idea of the protagonist getting the girl like icing on the cake
>Bias, much
>>63191616
>they just seem to be animations for pre-existing stuff from reviews and skits
You've figured it out!
It's not high art or a benchmark of quality, it was just some plinkett fan making shorts out of cut up reviews.
Mike liked them enough to repost them.
>>63191328
>that video
this guy is the living embodiment of the smug, detached Gen X ethos
>>63191153
CHANGED
MY
LIFE
>>63188289
>shill
>>/v/eddit
>and by the way just because somebody in the TPM does not automatically mean they are stupid
kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3AzlyTjWhE
Literally autism
>>63187392
This is shit. You're shit.
>>63191798
thank you based blade57hrc
The only think more pathetic than "reviewing" a childrens film is reviewing a review of a childrens film.
Is this Rockcock64?
>senator pulpatine
>queen amalda
>mos espa
If he's so into these movies shouldn't he know the names of shit?
>>63191242
This was amazing
>>63187392
>100 minute review on a 100 minute review of a 100 min film
This is what the internet has culminated in. What's really sad is that I am actually going to watch this. I am so alone.
>>63187624
a man has aspergers
>>63193122
>someone happens to disagree with your emperor Plinkett
>OMG HE MUST HAVE ASPERGERS!!!!!
*sigh*
>>63193401
Just watch it.
Hour mark
>Qui Gons Charm. He defies the Jedi Council Code and Tradition, because LIKE ME HE LIKES TO CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL THINKING.
His emphases and scattered ability to pronounce things are amusing + role playing a colo claw fish, and like three reaction clips.
>>63193598
The reason he didn't try elsewhere for the hyper drive is because it would have taken too long
Then ignores the pod racing part taking too long
RLM shit aside, this guy, shilling his shit all over this thread, shitposting, Jesus Christ, there's pathetic and then there's this guy. Defending the prequels like he has a stake in them.
Anons, we may have happened upon a gem. Not Chris Chan-level, but Latza-level surely. Or should I say, the gem happened upon us?
I love the link in the description for a site about star trek fans against bullying
HOLY SHIT BTFO
>>63187392
>comments are disabled for this video
Gee, what a surprise.
>If Plinkett were so right about the Star Wars Prequels he would have kept his Star Wars Prequel reviews a lot shorter and to the point.
If this guy was serious about this video, he would have kept his short and to the point.
>>63194776
>>63193888
No one will ever compare to based Latza.
Is this the same guy who wrote the 100 page "rebuttal" to the Phantom Menace?
>>63195006
Well he did violate the scientific law Occam's Razor.
>>63187392
>disabling both comments and rating
>fucking terrible audio
All I picked up from 10 seconds, but this was enough to ignore this shit. Don't try to ride on Plinkett's fame, OP
>>63187392
I didn't know this was reddit.
>>63187392
Why did you feel the need to bring up the pizza rolls? What bearing does this have on the validity of the review?
is this a RLM thread
>>63191798
What a dweeb.
>>63188209
oh god this
Anybody want a pizza roll?
>that part at the end about plinkett starting a new wave of cyber bullying
DIDN'T YOU KNOW THAT MOVIE REVIEWS HAVE TIME LIMITS BEFORE THEY VIOLATE SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES?!
https://youtu.be/sH6ttZaV9hk?t=422
>Michael Stoklasa and Simon Peggy, you two gits OFFEND me!
you can't make this shit up
