So will you be selling your inferior Blu-ray 1080p movies and upgrading your movies to Blu-ray 4k?
>>63058091
>blacked
http://www.uhdbdinnumbers.com/
supposedly all the films they're relesasing first all have 2K masters and they're upscaling.
>>63058091
You don't need that anymore coz there's a site where you can watch it and download it for free moviesovie.net bruh
>>63058091
Blackray
>>63058470
what the fuck? Why?
It's going to be the early days of shit blu-ray transfers all over again.
>>63058091
At this point, I'd honestly stick with 1920x1080 and increase the framerate, rather than keep framerates as they are and go 2K/4K etc.
>dvds are outselling bluray in 2015
>>63058091
I think I own like one blu-ray that someone bought out of curiosity and left at my house back when we first got something that could play them.
>>63058528
>I'd honestly stick with 1920x1080 and increase the framerate
lmao
>not watching a film in its intended framerate.
Is it true that to feel the difference between 1080p and 4K you should have at least a 55" screen?
>>63058553
I meant increasing the framerates at which future films are shot. Obviously.
Do you think the PS4 and Xbone will play them discs?
>>63058528
>this is what /v/ actually believes
Film frame rate is perfect, picture clarity is far more important.
>>63058583
I don't think either of them have compatible HDMI ports so both will need hardware revisions.
Most people who watch blu-rays are watching them on consoles, it's going to be as large a hurdle for 4k adoption as getting people to upgrade their sets I think.
>>63058572
>Obviously
No not obviously you moron, back to /v/
>>63058583
Current bluray players can't play UHD blurays so no.
>>63058585
Picture clarity on kinetic scenes is greatly improved by higher framerates.
>>63058561
I dont think ive seen a 4k model below 50' anyway.
>>63058528
>>>/v/
>>>/reddit/
>>63058616
Of course obviously. Like, is increasing the framerates of films that have already been shot even a thing? Is that something people do, or advocate doing? Why?
Bluray is my de facto format. It's not going anywhere for a good 20 years.
>>63058650
There are some retards who interpolate movies and jizz themselves yelling "IT'S SO SMOOTH"
>>63058650
People do that artificially with SVP
https://www.svp-team.com/
>>63058635
The clarity of each individual frame is what I'm referring to. The level of detail in each individual frame, the fineness of the grain etc.
>>63058583
Nope.
But MS and Sony probably have their consoles in "slim" versions all planned out and almost ready to go.
>>63058650
Sorry bro was ment for >>63058528
Why the fuck did we go to 4k instead of jumping to 8k? We have the technology and it would actually be a really obvious upgrade instead of a subtle one that the average consumer doesn't notice at first glance.
>>63058684
>>63058689
Oh, right. In my defence, that's dumb enough for me never to have heard of it.
>>63058705
>The clarity of each individual frame is what I'm referring to.
Firstly, you don't watch each individual frame. Secondly, the clarity of individual frames is also improved by higher framerates. Motion at, let's say, 15 mph (approximately the speed with which someone's hand might move as they lift a coffee cup to their mouth) in close-up, will often blur in standard framerates. At eg 60fps, it will blur far less, and may not blur at all.
>>63058728
Don't apologise, they're both me.
>>63058731
Great, now design a disc that can hold 500GB of data and doesn't cost a fortune.
8K is 16 times more pixels than 1080p you dumb tripfag
No, because my head is 2.1 meters away from my TV.
At 1080p that means a 50" is perfect, for 4k I'll need a 75" screen.
That shit's ridiculous and expensive as shit. I would rather just buy a ton more blu-rays for that price.
>>63058731
We have the technology, but lack the storage capacity.
I can't wait to see the yify 16k release that are only 4gb.
>>63058775
It's the exact same shit with Edison and Kodak, we had 65 mm film for ages but decided it'd be cheaper to make and use 35mm because shekels.
Considering the average person doesn't upgrade to new standards until many years after they're established, they should be pushing 8k for the retardedly rich early adopters and then make it so by the time the average person thinks about upgrading all of oir investment in 8k has made progress in even higher future resolutions. It's about aiming high.
>>63058091
I havent bought a single Bluray so far. DVD going strong!joke i only download or just sream in 1080p
>>63058528
>higher fps
havent you seen Hobbit in HFR?
Its horrible. 1080p already worsens all movies, which arent animated.
48fps would just kill it.
>>63058091
I will just continue pirating high quality rips.
Thanks YIFY.
>>63058854
Technology needed to make such discs doesn't exist yet and won't in years.
Not to mention the only 8K material available would be the few movies shot in 65 (70) mm, properly restored. You can't find that much detail in 35mm and no digital movie has been shot higher than 4K.
4k cases are ugly af to be honest
>>63058923
Fuck off, hipster Luddite.
>>63058752
Motion blur is an inherent trait of film, a byproduct of using a shutter to capture information. While higher frame rates are desirable in other mediums, particularly those that rely on user interaction, increasing the amount of visual information in a film ruins the 'trick' that film performs on the brain.
Namely giving just enough visual information for the brain to not notice smaller details that betray the 'magical' nature of a film, those which very much ground it in the reality of a couple of people standing around with a camera pointed at them.
Admittedly this is a cultural construct and one which can be overcome simply through watching more HFR stuff but it doesn't benefit the film watching experience. Taped television shows filmed at 50 or 60hz don't look inherently better than film, in fact they look cheaper.
>Firstly, you don't watch each individual frame.
True but a significant increase in resolution is still noticeable, watch a DVD and Blu-ray and tell me theres no real difference. increase in resolution is massively important, especially with most projects being digital these days.
Here's an interesting article on the subject from a couple of years ago:
http://www.tested.com/art/movies/452387-48-fps-and-beyond-how-high-frame-rates-affect-perception/
>>63058091
Is this a "terrible movies that /tv/ tricked you into watching"
Kingsmen is caca
Patiently waiting for cheap OLED
>>63058528
This ain't CS:GO faggot.
>>63058534
>People using physical media for anything other than archiving in 2015
They might as well just call it "physical autism".
>>63058988
>increasing the amount of visual information in a film ruins the 'trick' that film performs on the brain.
This is empirically false, so I didn't bother reading the rest.
>>63059032
That's a shame. I was interested in your counterpoint.
>>63059032
>This is empirically false
Do you even know what "empirically" means?
>>63059168
Yes. Do you?
>>63058091
So are they finally getting rid of packaging dvds? No one in their right mind would want 5 or 6 copies of the same fucking movie
>>63059184
Yes.
>>63059245
I wonder if there's a way to test that assertion.
>falling for the disc jew
kek
I bought literally 4 blurays, plus a Kubrick boxset.
Fucking jews can suck my foreshkin.
>>63059030
>Physical media
Are you retarded? any form of storage is physical.
>>63059393
How is that supposed to be hard? Only retards would have trouble and read the word.
>>63058091
Eventually, yeah. I don't want to be the equivalent of people who still buy DVDs now. Makes me sick.
I'll buy some once I get around to buying a 4K display in the next year or two. I used to buy a shitload of blu-rays when I lived in an area with shit internet, but nowadays I don't bother.
The 4K thing will take years to get moving. Most people still buy fucking DVDs when they've owned 1080p TVs for like five years.
>paying money for 480p
I don't even pirate SD video.
>>63058936
>no digital movie has been shot higher than 4K.
False. Many movies are shot in 6K. Gone Girls being a big example. The newest cameras from Red (Weapon) and Arri (65) Shoot 8k.
I own like ten physical blu rays and most of them are Michael Mann films. Why bother when you can just download a complete rip of a blu ray and play it on your projector or the films look like shit anyway so having them on DVD doesn't even matter?
