>2015
>Hollywood is still butthurt about Senator McCarthy
The truth is out there.
>>63016903
fuck yeah they are. i heard george clooney talking about it and he made it sound like people were being put on the rack to rat each other out, then crucified once discovered. not to mention that many of the people targeted were communists.
>>63016903
>Louis C.K.
Where's the black bull?
>>63016966
Clooney is a typical Hollywood libtard that made a movie glorifying that hack Murrow, CBS' lead propagandist as a hero fighting for freedom of speech.
The goyim must never know that he was right.
http://www.rense.com/general37/mcc.htm
http://takimag.com/article/dalton_trumbo_had_it_coming_patrick_buchanan/print#axzz3sPwzw9W3
Holy fuck, are there still people in burgerland that don't accept that hunting the communists was right?
>>63017159
That seems to be the consensus. Goyims on the West were always easy to brainwash.
>>63017141
Pat Buchanan may be the most redpilled man alive.
>>63017159
Why would it be? I don't really have an opinion either way, and I'm curious as to the positive effects it had
>>63016943
Does anyone else think he looks like Ted Cruz or is it just me?
>Venona documents declassified in the 1990s exposed a ton of the people investigated by HUAC as actual Communists
>anally annihilated heebs still push their red scare story
ayyyyyyy lmao
>>63017254
>Cold War
>allowing KGB informants to openly work in your country
Get out you pinko fuck.
americans liberties and freedoms are at stake because they didnt weed out these communists. they infected the media, schools and politics with their propaganda.
he may not be the hero we deserved...
>>63017297
Did you really expect more from your average American?
>>63017159
I think it's less about the hunting the communists and more about the "abusing your status and accusing people you don't like of being communists to ruin their reputation" part.
>>63017159
it sure as shit wasn't legal
>>63017266
>filename
>>63017288
>>63017159
So what if they were though. Where in the constitution is the government allowed to investigate and harass people for having views they don't like? Isn't that against freedom of speech? If a Communist leaning person was elected to office who can say thats illegal in America?
>>63017310
It's funny cause when they push their Red Scare propaganda they always portray him as that big bad totalitarian guy that censors the freedom of speech.
>>63017371
Because communism goes against nearly everything in the Constitution
A communist by definition would almost always vote illegally against the Constitution
>>63017371
>conveniently 'overlooking' this post >>63017297
You're not even trying.
>>63017266
I'll never forgive this faggot for the runoff election. It felt like 6 extra months of political ads.
>>63017297
No I'm serious I have no idea what was going on in that time and everything I've heard about McCarthy up until now has been nothing but bad, and that most of his supposed commies were innocent, if he even nailed any at all.
All I can think of is that it put people on edge and might have made it harder for soviet spies to obtain information in the US or to stay as fully functional informants. But then, I have no concrete sources of such things ever happening, or this being the case.I hate commies just as much as you friendWell maybe not, but I do
>>63017401
I'm not talking about actual spies, of course they should be prosecuted. I meant the finger pointing and witch hunts because someone may have gone to a communist meeting once
>>63017371
Where in the Constitution does it say we should prop up foreign governments who might be a little non-democratic or violent because they are willing to stomp down on communists? Nowhere, but these are the kinds of things you have to do when dealing with filthy Soviet fucks.
>>63017442
How do you know who is a spy? They don't wear badges or comically fake mustaches.
>>63017457
What does the constitution have to do with foreign policy?
>>63017457
this
more people in US need to realize what kind of animals they were
>>63017483
Seems like a good enough reason to ruin perfectly innocent people's lives whilst simultaneously creating a boogey man for counter culture to react against.
>>63017371
The First Amendment doesn't have any provision for the allowance of stealing secrets from the Manhattan project, or the selling military intelligence to the Soviet Union as in the case of the Cambridge Spy Ring. Even if you disagree about both Julius and Ethel Rosenberg getting the chair, ex post facto analyses pretty much confirm that Julius was guilty and Ethel a knowing accomplice.
>>63016903
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Roach
A fucking kike.
Who would have thought?
>>63017561
Again, I'm not talking about actual spies
>>63017521
The vast majority of the people he went after were actually guilty of the things he accused them of. You can find it all and it's not on some biased conspiracy sites. It's actually even on my native Wikipedia, just at the bottom of the page. You were just so long brainwashed you can't get over your scummy bias. That's okay, I understand. You're just a Westerner. You were born this way.
>>63017266
>McCarthy BTFO of hollywood liberals
>Ted Cruz looks like McCarthy
>Ellen Page tried to debate Cruz and got #rekt
P O E T R Y
>>63017371
It's called sedition.
It's one of the few measures of balance that would legally allow us to deal with Islamic extremists instead of them being protected by "muh free speech" while they literally plot the demise of the country.
Expect to see it become a big issue.
>>63017521
>perfectly innocent
Guess again, bub.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venona_project
Also, the HUAC didn't go after fucking nobodies like you. They went after people in the public eye whom they felt held some sway over people, like Walt Disney's animators, or Dashiell Hammett, or the like.
>>63017633
Simply being a communist isn't fucking sedition.
>>63016903
Well no shit. Hollywood is an extension of the liberal media.
While republicans are against the government invading privacy, liberals are against thr government taking action against foreign nationals in our country.
It's just another social conditioning movie to chip away at the idea that your country can be infiltrated at a federal level.
Mcarthy was right the whole time.
>>63017658
>Critics assert most people and organizations identified by McCarthy were not mentioned in the Venona content and that his accusations remain largely unsupported by evidence.[54]
Okay.
>>63017593
Again, if you weren't actually an active Communist, or in the public eye as an obvious Soviet sympathizer, then the HUAC wasn't going to just put a pillow sheet over your head and haul you off to Leavenworth. Thinking that that's actually what happened is laughable.
>>63017672
It is when communists want to overthrow the government.
>>63017727
Because its only one OR the other right?
I'm not American, someone explain this stuff to me.
>>63017672
Tell me how the Founding Fathers felt about Tories and Loyalists.
Then tell me they wouldn't feel the same about Communist Russian sympathizers and Islamic extremists.
>>63017791
>buttblasted Hollywood liberals are still buttblasted about being called Communists in the 50s
It being an election year surely has nothing to do with trying to make Republicans look bad I'm sure. Who am I kidding? No one, but people who already liberal are going to watch this shit anyways.
>>63017791
In the 50's a US senator headed the House Un-American Activities Committee which was designed to root out communist sympathizers and spies by using the same tactics that worked so well in the salem witch trials.
>>63017718
McCarthy threw names out, almost at random. That doesn't mean that there weren't actual Communists in Hollywood, or in Cambridge, or in Alamogordo. I'm not defending him because he was a shallow blowhard, even if his intentions were fine by me.
McCarthy just made the mistake of inconveniencing powerful people in Hollywood enough to torpedo his political career.
The whole "Red Scare" rhetoric where some government agent picks you up to be reeducated is a fabrication and nothing more.
>>63017791
There was a war between the US and the USSR and some very important people had too much sympathy for the USSR and could possibly help them against their former country in subtle ways.
Since that's TREASON THEN the US formed an office in the 50's that persecuted all people suspect of having such sympathies AND the means to put them in action.
>>63017141
100% correct. I love patIslam is just as bad. Look up the Muslim Brotherhood in north america.
>>63017823
Seems like a poor example since the Founding Fathers were the seditious ones.
>>63017727
No, but they would publicly ruin you and destroy your carer.
>>63017864
Schlomo pls
>>63017853
>McCarthy just made the mistake of inconveniencing powerful people in Hollywood enough to torpedo his political career.
He was fine until he started going after the Military.
He BTFO the first time he insinuates some high ranking military figure has sympathetic leanings towards communism.
>>63017894
nothing wrong when that when you are actively trying to destroy the country.
hell everyday liberals do that now for small political differences
>>63017920
Even Ike was a afraid of his intel.
>>63017891
British Empire pls go
The sun set
>>63017791
In the 1950s, a blowhard senator named Joe McCarthy wanted to further his political career by calling out various notable Americans on being Communist sympathizers.
He inconvenienced a lot of the wrong people in Hollywood, so now, sixty years later, Hollywood Jews continue to perpetuate the story that mean ol' Joe is gonna pick you up and reeducate you if you read a socialist newsletter.
Meanwhile, back in real life, there were indeed actual Communist threats to national security in the 50s, and declassified intelligence has confirmed that several of the people who ended up being pursued by the intelligence community were indeed guilty of espionage.
You just don't hear about Alger Hiss, or the Rosenbergs, or Klaus Fuchs, or the myriad other spies, because Hollywood would rather push the narrative of some fascist state clamping down on your livelihood.
>>63018000
You can get away with anything, except for fucking with the military industrial complex, the petrodollar, or the Fed. It never just never works out.
I irony of Liberals still being butthurt over the Red Scare is that Liberals are currently creating The Red Scare 2.0.
We should call it "The Racist Scare" or something.
Seriously, talk to a Liberal sometime about "racists".
Then replace every instance of "Communist" in a quote from Joseph McCarthy with "Racist". It matches up almost perfectly.
"They're everywhere! You can't see them or hear them, but they are there! We have to hunt them down by any means necessary! You agree, don't you? You aren't one of THEM, are you?...."
People are currently being unofficially blacklisted and having their lives/careers ruined thanks to this shit, inside Hollywood and outside of it.
The only difference?
Communists are and were a credible threat to the stability of the nation and comprised a legitimate threat from those that would do us harm.
Racists, however, are a threat to your feelings.
>>63018049
This. And you always hear about how Edward Murrow is that upstanding guy, the idol, the perfect example of an integrity in journalism, always fighting for it, isn't he just great? But you never hear how he actively pushed propaganda against McCarthy and edited out his statements to make him look bad, to the point they lost their original context. But you COINCIDENTALLY never hear about it. He's the father of journalist, Le This is London...
>>63018049
Thanks m8
>>63018068
You think what was that he had on him? I'm sure he had something proving he knew about Soviets planning an assasination on Patton himself.
>>63018164
>ywn live in a world where Patton and Macarthur kept WWII going and slapped the shit out of the Soviets.
>>63018068
This guy fuckin' gets it
McCarthy would've LOVED Tumblr.
>>63018101
Actually the Red Scare of the 50s was the Second Red Scare. The First was in 1919-1921 after the creation of Soviet Russia.
>>63018233
They'd have lost. Hard. In a conventional military fight the US Army in 1945 was inferior to the Soviet Army in both quality and quantity.
>>63019038
Holy fuck are you joking? The U.S. would have obliterated the Soviets. They had no navy or air force to speak of and the rest of their technology was laughably outdated. They had a lot of bodies to throw out there but America would have torn that ass up.
>>63019119
>They had no air force
This. WWII was the war that showed the importance of air superiority.
Even if you're not going to invade all of Russia, you still prevent the iron curtain going up through the middle of Europe. You'd prevent the USSR for forming as we know it. Hell annex Korea and the Kamchatka as protectorates while you're at it.
On top of all that, the Russians weren't even close to having an atomic bomb and the US was building more as fast as they could.
>>63019119
Ok, let’s start from the top.
The standard Soviet Battle Tank in 1945 was the T34/85. It had better all-around protection than the M4 Medium, had a higher power-to-weight ratio, was faster and offered lower ground pressure. The 85mm Gun was roughly equal to the 76mm though the greater weight of shell did give it a higher chance to destroy a tank with a penetrating hit.
The standard Soviet Heavy Tank was the ISII, which was superior in every way to the M26 Pershing. It had thicker armour (120mm compared to the 102mm on the Pershing), a vastly more powerful gun (the 122mm D25T could penetrate 145mm of Armour plate at 1000metres, whereas the 90mm M3 of the Pershing could only penetrate 103mm) and was available in greater numbers (there were less than 30 Pershings in Europe at the time WWII ended, compared to several thousand ISII).
Man for man, a US Soldier and a Soviet Soldier were about equal, but the Soviets had far greater numbers and a wiliness to use them. Most US and for that matter British army formations were weary and wanting the war to be over by May 1945, which affected their combat performance.
Only in the air did the Allies have the advantage, with far more and far superior aircraft, mainly bombers. Even then they'd have had a hard fight, as Soviet Aircraft were very well armed with highly powerful cannons and they were not adverse to suicide ramming tactics in desperate situations.
Though this all overlooks that no-one who had a shred of sanity wanted the war to continue, Everyone was exhausted from years of fighting. No-one would have willingly continued the war for any reason. There’s a reason Patton’s ideas were shot down in flames.
>>63019503
>There’s a reason Patton’s ideas were shot down in flames.
Because they were bitches. Every time they let the man do his job, he exceeded the expectations. If there was a man in history that could have beat Russia in a land war, it was Patton.
Plus, I can't stress it enough, we had the bomb and were willing and able to use them. No MAD to stop them, or a real understanding of the repercussions. Just the threat of it is worth all the tank armor you can come up with.
>>63016903
>Fuck the commies, and fuck Lewis C.K.
>>63019854
The exact same reasons the Bomb wasn't used in Korea. Or that they didn't nuke the Soviets during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Or that they don't use poison gas against Isis now. Public opinion. Civilians keep the Soldiers in line and from doing whatever shit they want to do. Because in the end it is they who pay the price.
In 1945 Europe was already in ruins. Taking on the Soviets would have simply added a few more million dead and kept the soldiers away from home for a few more years. And no-one wanted that. Besides, if the USSR had been overthrown in WWII, something else would have come up to oppose the US. Or the Americans would have fought each other in the sixties or something similar.
>>63017141
>"Dalton Trumbo was a socialist, but he loved being rich."
Charlie Chaplin was another hypocritical socialist; one of the richest men in the world.
>>63016903
>Hollywood is completely silent on modern day SJW McCarthyism
>Hollywood still makes dramas about the McCarthyism of 50 years ago with the pretense of it being bold and important.
>>63019503
Not to mention, you don't fight Russia in Russia. Just as you don't fight the US in the US.
>>63020148
>Not understanding that this is the contemporary version of Arthur Miller's "The Crucible."
>>63019967
Hypocrite and socialist goes hand-in-hand.
>>63019967
He changed his views later in life.
>>63020248
Most people do.
if there was never a red scare in america the minimum wage would be $20 and we would have a 20 hour work week.
>faggots unironically think that mccarthy did nothing wrong
Ironically, the motherfucker was literally an unintentional communist. One of those "don't question the government, obey them" scumfucks. Fucking kill yourselves if you think he did nothing wrong. He should of been publicly lynched. He didn't give a shit about communism anyways. Scumfucks like mccarthy are the worst part of the republican party.
>>63020148
The funny thing is, McCarthy never had anything to do with the inquiries into Hollywood. McCarthy was a Senator and the House handled the Hollywood stuff.
McCarthy himself was deeply involved in the government side of things, and he was more than often right: Soviet agents were active at the highest echelons of the US government during WW2, and after the war they gave the USSR the plans for nuclear weapons.
>>63020326
>One of those "don't question the government, obey them" scumfucks.
Oh, is that why he crusaded against Communist infiltration of the Federal Government?
The Soviet Union released their records after the end of the Cold War, and he WAS right. He wasn't perfect, and he was a drinker, but he was right.
>>63020248
Which one, Trumbo or Chaplin?
>>63016903
Didn't McCarthy wind up being right?
>>63021094
He did. It's amazing how many people named by McCarthy in labor union leadership positions as being communist turned out to be Soviet Spies after Kremlin files on them were de-classified.
>>63017397
How do you vote illegally?
>>63021182
How many ?
>>63017622
>yfw they're both Canadian
>>63016903
I'm actually really impressed that Hollywood has the balls to celebrate a legitimate Communist
What other Hollywood films have legitimately leftist themes? Not in the /pol/ sense, but in the actual sense.
>>63021329
Stonewall?
>>63019854
Probably wouldn't have been well received if the US just turned on its former fighting buddy immediately after cock blocking Germany
>>63017159
It's not right. Being a Communist isn't inherently a bad thing.
Unless you're literally a Soviet spy, there's no reason to be persecuted. And being a Communist in the US doesn't make you a Soviet spy any more than being anti-Communist in Russia would make you an American spy.
>>63017371
THIS
>>63017397
>Because communism goes against nearly everything in the Constitution
So does Neo-Naziism but it's not a crime.
Same thing with the myths of JFK and Nixon
>>63017561
Who's talking about legitimate spies? Anybody who is actually a traitor should be treated as such, but being a Communist is 100% protected by the Constitution.
While I think all Communism is quite wacky, and Soviet Communism evil, one could certainly read the US constitution as a document advocating democratic socialism.
>>63017586
Well yeah but that's Hollywood
Half of the more conservative films in Hollywood were made by Jewish people as well.
>>63017586
Jews OWN the republican media
>tfw McCarthy was literally right
Look up the Verona documents
I don't know why he's been made out to be some sort of meme boogey man
>>63018101
As a legitimate commie I agree with you.
American leftism is essentially dead thanks to the rise in identity politics.
Hillary Clinton basically represents the death of the American left. She's as conservative as a Republican in essentially every issue except women's rights and gay liberation.
>>63017397
>Because communism goes against nearly everything in the Constitution
kek
>A communist by definition would almost always vote illegally against the Constitution
Only one thing trumps the constitution and that is the democratic will of the people. You can't "vote illegally" any more than you can think illegally. It's obviously legal, for example, to vote yes on a referendum to abolish the whole constitution.
>>63018101
Also, doubly ironically, they're creating whole new generations of actual racists in the process.
Nobody's going to admit it, but when a group of blacks and their white keks bust into the library while you're studying for a midterm and start screeching in your face, all you're going to think is, "These fucking niggers".
All hail a new era of American racial strafe where there once was none.
>>63020153
This is such shit armchair strategy.
Fighting a war in your enemy's territory is much preferred to fighting a war in your own. This has been the basis of essentially all post-WW2 war doctrine. Because violence happening in one's own country can actually be WORSE than your enemy winning the war.
Would you rather beat the Nazis in a war that would destroy many American cities, or let the Nazis win and keep your own cities self?
Putting the safety of your homeland before ideological goals is selfish, but it's also the smartest way to fight a war.
By capitulating to the Allied powers in 1919 before its major cities could be occupied, Germany ended WW1 in a much better position than it ended WW2. The Versailles accords were ridiculous, but Germany's ability to bounce back from them shows how healthy their post-WW1 position was.
Nobody like Hitler would have been able to rise in post-WW2 Germany, because the war was fought on German soil and ended with a massive occupation.
>>63019023
That's the double irony. Apologists for Stalin and Mao keep saying "the famines weren't as bad as the corporate media portrayed them, and whatever suffering there was , was justly deserved by 'reactionary elements'." Orwell would agree with you about the role of language in power: whoever controls the meaning of language,
controls the state.
>>63021348
>legitimately leftist
>>63021414
>anti-Communist in Russia would make you an American spy
because you'd be dead or in the gulag
>>63017159
>>63016943
McCarthy was right and Jews are the biggest pushers of communism and other forms of Marxism including SJWs and BLM
>>63019503
They were also completely reliant on lend-lease auxiliary vehicles and food. Russian artillery was pulled by Studebakers.
Source: Victor Suvorov "The Liberators" defected tank batallion commander. You should read it.
>>63017159
Sure. there's Michael Parenti, went to Moscow after the Wall fell and screamed at the Russian audience "you were never Marxists!" "I'm more Marxist than you ever were!" His running tag is "Wealth creates poverty!"
>remember spending days at a time learning about how evil and wrong McCarthy was and that the idea that the Soviets would try to subvert American politics, media, and academia is absolutely ridiculous at my American public school
>The Eastern front of WWII and all of WWI were mentioned in passing less than five times
wasn't just america the commies got to, they stole our (british) secrets too like the jet engine, weapon designs, ship/submarine plans etc
wouldn't surprise me if they helped the IRA bomb us either
>>63017159
>>63017297
>>63017397
>>63017727
>>63017979
I thought John Wayne died a long time ago.
>mccarthy was right!
>if you question the government you are a commie
Please be more smarter than this. Faggots like mccarthy causes irrationality. Killing liberty in order to prevent a different liberty-killer is not justified at all. Fascism and communism should be both obliterated from this planet.
>>63017371
Movies like this, as well as the news articles, support the old Stalinists. These people were supporters of Stalin. Trumbo wrote that FDR was traitorous for supporting a monarchy in Britain against collapse, and supporter the north in the Korean War.
Stalin murdered millions, and supporters should be vilified, just as Nazis should be vilified.
>>63017851
>senator headed the House Un-American Activities Committee
A Senator headed a House committee. People are this dumb.
>>63022918
>McCarthy
>le call conservatives fascist buzzword
trash time
Liberty is something that is actively maintained, and declassified Kremlin docs proved we were too inactive. Communism was a threat in a world where there were legitimate Communist powers next door. Your limp-wristed sophistry is the tool of decadence.
>>63017823
Loyalists were sometimes tarred and feathered. Their houses might be burned, their possessions looted, themselves found murdered.
At the end of the American Revolution, most found themselves emigrating to Canada.
Thomas Edison was an American because his family kept picking the losing side. They were for the king in the American Revolution, and fled to Canada when they lost, and then they were against the king in the rebellions, and fled to America when they lost.
The problem is McCarthy basically just had a dartboard where a tenth of it was the target and he threw enough darts to hit that target. While he did manage to accomplish some good things he did it in a retarded way that caused way more damage than necessary. It also lead to a bad precedent that could be exploited to harm honest Americans in a situation similar to 1984, but luckily most people caught on to the negative possibilities of his methods.
>>63023065
You can't fucking read can you?
I didn't call all conservatives "facist". I just said both fascism and communism must be obliterated from the fucking planet. We should not embrace either one of em. The kremlin docs was beside the point. Mccarthy faggot was using fascist tactics to infringe on anybody who questioned the government.
You're the limp wristed cunt here you boot licking citizen.
Oh and go back to highschool and learn to fucking read
>>63023469
Don't try to backtrack on pedantic bullshit you just made up. Fascism hadn't been relevant for a long time when McCarthy was around. Keep that salt under control, we don't want you to have a heart attack when Bernie gets dropped harder than your parents dropped you.
>>63023518
>hurr i will make assumptions that will help me make him look bad in front of other anons
Kill yourself pro-statist faggot. Mccarthy was fascist big government scumfuck.
All big government loving statists should be deported or lynched. They are a nuisance for American ideals
>>63023609
You talk like a legitimately schizophrenic person I know, you gotta get a grip
It was like another Shoah
>>63016903
McCarthy had nothing to do with the blacklists. They pre-date him by a couple years. Trumbo, and the rest of the Hollywood Ten, so humiliated the industry before the HUAC on the orders of the Communist Party that the industry had no choice but to institute the blacklists in order to save face. Even then they were a joke. Most could get around it by using aliases and those that couldn't lived luxurious lifestyles making movies in Europe. And after a while it was forgotten and Hollywood went right back to being the Communist shit hole that it was before.
Mean while, their hero, "Uncle" Joe Stalin was murdering and enslaving millions. Liberals are the most entitled, prissy bitch-ass drama queens alive.
>>63023901
>hurr it wasn't life and death, it was only getting their careers destroyed! What are you guys so mad about?
>Surely all those Hollywood scum knew about Stalin's gulags and supported them! They were regular travelers to Siberia and Kamchatka!
>>63020221
Free market capitalists, communists, supporting either one makes you scum tbqh
>>63023699
I don't trust that squash.
>>63024093
That's the kind of squash I wouldn't mind warming up in the microwave...
>>63024018
>>hurr it wasn't life and death
Communist spies (i.e. liberals) had stolen our state secret since the early days of the New Deal and had used those secrets to conquer Eastern Europe, being able to get away with it because they had our nuke technology. You bet it was life and death.
>it was only getting their careers destroyed
They should have thought of that before they started penning pro-Soviet propaganda like Trumbo's Mission to Moscow, on the order of the Communist Party. It wasn't persecution so much as cultural self-preservation.
>Surely all those Hollywood scum knew about Stalin's gulags and supported them!
They were common knowledge in Communist circles. Trumbo supported them whole-heartedly.
>>63022222
WITNESSED! and
PURE TRUTH
U
R
E
T
R
U
T
H
>>63022222
McCarthy was right AF
>>63024465
>Communist spies (i.e. liberals)
Man, not even people in the movie were this bad. This guy's trolling for the gusto.
>>63017397
>would almost always vote illegally against the Constitution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YziNNCZeNs
I really really liked good night and good luck
>>63021414
>Being a Communist isn't inherently a bad thing.
>>63018101
>Racists, however, are a threat to your feelings
Here's the problem with "eliminating racism".
It's fucking impossible. The only way to end it is to mix the races until all uniqueness is melted together OR a quick genocide*.
*See current South Africa
>>63016903
It's ironic because we've turned a corner onto a new 'unspeakable ism' from communism.
Back then, the ultimate shut down was to call someone a communist. Disagree with US foreign policy? you're a communist. Disagree with anything that goes against majority opinion? Communist.
Today that's changed, now that ism is racism/sexism. Disagree with anything liberals have to say about the economy? racist and sexist. Disagree that every company should have quotas for women and minorities shoved down their throat by the government? Racist and sexist.
I wouldn't be surprised if some far left california congressman came out with a list of known racists who are mostly their political enemies.
