Any of you niggers gonna upgrade your bluray collection to 4K discs? The first batch is coming out early 2016
>>62935479
>Any of you niggers gonna upgrade your BDrip collection to 4K?
Early adopter's a shit.
Fuck no, I just got into buying blurays
not until 10 years from now when 4k BDs are under $15
>>62935548
>only being able to fit 10 movies in a hdd
The first 4K discs coming out are all trash:
The Amazing Spiderman 2 (Tomatometer: 52%)
Chappie (31%)
Hancock (41%)
Pineapple Express (68%)
Salt (62%)
The Smurfs 2 (14%)
4k is already dead in the water.
Based South Korea and Japan are launching 8k TVs, content and services early 2016
>>62935720
>Tomatometer
I don't even have a 4k display yet. There doesn't seem any point with a 50" TV.
70mm film transfers to 4k are the only ones worth it, the rest is just upscaled shit
when will this 4/8k meme end and manufactures can focus on shit that matters more for a display, better color and wesley snipes level blacks?
> 300GB to download one movie
how long does it take to burn one of these fuckers to disc, 3 hours?
Guys is it bad that I DON'T want 4k to take off? /v/ wants it to, but dear god almighty I don't. I have over 700+ blurays and 1000+ dvd and blurays collected. I have nearly every classic you can think of and a 65-inch panasonic zt60 (last plasma before OLED with the pinnacle of film pic quality). Everything looks perfect and I still collect blurays biweekly. Why do I need to upgrade?
Sure, I'd like the zero black levels of an OLED, but I don't want a fucking 4ktv and see y shit upscaled. Also, OLEDs are still shitty with motion resolution under 60fps for films.An I don't want my collection upscaled and having to restart and rebuy everything. Why is everything rushing so fast? Why do we need another standard? Television programs are at at fucking 720p, most people have and still buy dvds. Wtf is going on?? Will 4k please die?
>>62935879
OLED screens
All that to have "stronger blacks"
lel
I'll stick with yfiy thank u
>>62935720
top kek
why picked this shit out?
>>62935922
go to bed grandad, we technology now.
I just started investing in blu ray last year and have a sweet collection, I'm staying with it for as long as I can.
Also how many films really need a 4K transfer right now?
>>62935879
Ultra high dynamic contrast ratio is coming. I doubt it will reach plasma levels, but oled is getting cheaper every year.
>>62935479
1080 blurays are still struggling against DVDs, there's no way this is going to be successful. I'm quite happy with my dvd collection.
only once resolution has gone higher than the human eye can perceive (8k resolution on a standard screen size ) will I upgrade.
>>62935922
your Blu-Ray 1080p is dead.
>>62935922
>>62935988
plasmas still had a better colour quality than OLEDs do now?
Why didn't they put some great looking like Lawrence of Arabia on that list instead?
>>62935704
BDrips would be like 40gb if they were untouched. At the same bitrate relative to resolution, the 4k rips will be more like 50gb.
>>62935922
People still have big VHS collections. 1080p is really really low. Technology doesn't wait for you because you are poor.
>>62936024
>4k is still pixilated shit
I'll wait for 8k.
>>62935720
what an awful list
>>62935951
They don't want to release the good movies until they can make a big deal about it, so they have to wait until more people can take 4k media.
how much do you guys think the first 4k BD movie and player will cost?
>>62935922
Why is it that people like you buy into technology that has to become obsolete at some point and then get upset that your technology has become obsolete.
>>62935879
They do, it's just that these things end up costing ten times what people are willing to pay for and what most media is capable of even utilizing.
>>62936038
No. They were great but oled actually switches that bit of the screen off for black.
>>62936140
About £300, the ps4 has 4k playback.
>>62936038
After being calibrated, my zt60 basically has perfect color, and the blacks are the DEEPEST for any non-OLED set guaranteed. It was the last set Panasonic made before they transitioned to full OLED production and sold off all plasmas. It's the pinnacle of picture quality and what Panasonic was working up towards, a loveletter to a generation. It's a beauty. The only next thing OLED can do better is blacks definitively. Everything else is objectively worse, so LG are not reeling me in. ESPECIALLY with 4k and overpriced shit.
LONG LIVE PLASMA!!
>>62936074
Can you honestly see the difference?
I have a 1080p panasonic plasma (I'm not the guy above). I see no difference between it and the 4ks on sale in the shops now in terms of pixels. The colours on it are better than the much newer LEDs on sale.
>>62936214
what year did you buy the zt60 and for how much?
>>62936214
>my zt60 basically has perfect color
Not really. New standards will increase the available colour spectrum, something that won't work on your plasma.
>>62936237
2013 for $3500
STILL LOVE IT AND VERY GRATEFUL. THANK YOU PANASONIC! YOU WILL BE MISSED
>>62936218
I think the only selling point 4k has is for bigger screens. You are not going to see a difference between 1080 and 4k on a 24 inch screen because of pixel density unless you have your nose pressed against the screen, but it could be more noticeable on 100+ inch screens.
This is for people who want the cinema experience without having to go to the cinema, or can't go to the cinema because of the no singles policy.
>>62935945
that is more the screen type.
Plasma and OLED have the best black levels.
oh wait. you are speaking about niggas. i forget you people literately can not stop talking about them. it is almost like you are obsessed with nigger dick.
>>62936325
And those type of people do NOT browse 4chan.
>>62936333
wew lad
>>62936357
you obviously don't belong here, and I doubt you're even a home theater enthusiast, so you offer no sort of worthwhile content to this thread, so why don't you kindly go back to /pol/, you inbred.
>>62936393
run-on big time. I corrected myself.
>>62936393
W E W
E
W
L A D
A
D
>>62936214
>LONG LIVE PLASMA!
It's dead brah. No one is making it anymore.
>they dont have a 55EG9600
>have the gall to speak about home theater.
>>62936393
>muh serious thread
>actually calling himself a 'home theater enthusiast'
What a guy
>>62936455
>they don't have a 77EG9700
>they can get the fuck off my board
QUINTESSENTIAL PROOF /V/ AND /A/ ARE INVADING /TV/. I'M NOT CRAZY I TELL YOU. /TV/ WOULD NEVER FUCKING ADVOCATE 4K LET ALONE 8K! LEAVE YOU'RE RUINING CINEMA
>>62936325
>I think the only selling point 4k has
It's a good marketing move. The price for tvs have really dumped the last couple of years and they need something new to drive a higher price point. I'm not really sure your average person is even going to care.
if they have an ok larger set right now, they are not going to all of sudden drop coin into a slightly better set.
>mfw all the high-def fags will never know the joys of vhs and 240p
>they'll even think I'm memeing
BUT MUH PORES
>>62936538
But actual movie theaters use 8k for their big ass screens.
why dont you get a better paying job and buy a proper TV set.
i bet you dont even KNOW about motion clarity ratings.
>>62935479
wha..?
pretty sure I've owned Taxi Driver in 4k for over a year
HEY NORMIES check em
>>62936568
>muh nostalgia and hipster cred
i bet you also still use cassette tapes and floppies.
>>62936568
>never know the joys of vhs
be honest now, the only joy left in VHS is finding that OOP tape that will never be re-released on even DVD, never mind bluray.
I don't get it. If you're sitting at least 4 feet away from your tv like a decent fucking human being, why do we need 4k all of a sudden? We've reached the pinnacle of picture quality. We did it bros. Pack up and go home. Fix the color and motion resolution on OLED and make a fucking 1080p 77 inch set, we're good. No need to continue.
>>62935720
pineapple express is cool
>>62936704
>I don't get it. If you're sitting at least 4 feet away from your tv like a decent fucking human being, why do we need 1080p all of a sudden? We've reached the pinnacle of picture quality. We did it bros. Pack up and go home. Fix the color and motion resolution on CRT and make a fucking 240i 77 inch set, we're good. No need to continue.
>>62935922
>I have over 700+ blurays and 1000+ dvd and blurays collected
look at this consumerist whore
>>62936857
OP here. I like you.
>>62936857
>>62936890
It's known fags like each other
>>62936784
DUDE
>>62936915
WEED
>>62936873
you can't get dts-hdma or dolby truehd 5.1 sound let alone the entire 30+gb bluray from any random classic movie you pirate from some chink site. Also, I like to actually support the film industry unlike you, yiffer.
The Dark Knight Rises
>>62935479
Here's hoping this leads to distribution companies re-scanning films at a higher quality and not fucking them up too hard with color correctionit won't tho it just means we'll be getting upscales and even more intense color correction/filtering because people somehow associate that with quality
>>62936946
Lotta lies and assumptions. Good goy.
>>62936946
ITT: Shills
>>62936568
>taking joy from spending 5 minutes just rewinding the tape and having that tracking shit pop up
>>62936993
>>62936983
>>62936973
>uh oh people dont validate my views on shit tvs
>better drag out the shill an kike memes
>>62936973
Find the entire content of the bluray for Close Encounters of the Third Kind or Criterion release of Breathless all for free. Go ahead, I'll wait.Oh yeah, that's right, you don't watch multiple cuts of your films or watching behindthe-scenes docs or read film essays or listen to commentaries. Oh yeah that's right, you don't belong here, /pol/. The door's right there.
>>62936046
This desu.
>>62937084
is this art?
>>62937084
NOW THAT'S CINEMA
>/tv/ hates YIFY because his rips shitty picture quality
>/tv/ hates 4K and demands to keep watching movies with shitty picture quality
>>62936931
LMAO
>>62936348
>can't go to the cinema because of the no singles policy.
> those type of people do NOT browse 4chan.
first day here?
>>62936946
Kek, tell that to the 28gb blu-ray rip of Lawrence of Arabia currently sitting in my harddrive
>>62937176
Dude I meant richfags with enough to spend on a 100+ inch 4k screen. Those types of enthusiasts you referred to do NOT browse here. Most you'll see here is 65-inch.
>>62937211
maybe not on /tv/ but the richfags with huge 4k screens all live in /g/ and they compare each others penis screens with regular threads.
>>62937181
I said RANDOM not one of the most WELL-KNOWN and well-regarded films of mankind. Find one for this, you asshole. http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Movie-Movie-Blu-ray/134726/
A 1080p bluray is a magical thing. A 4k bluray is betamax, and no one cares about betamax which is why it died.
>>62937211
My father got my mother one of those ultra big 4k screens for Christmas last year, personally I can't see the point tho since at the time there were only about twenty movies to watch on it and a couple of nature documentaries
>>62937211
8unzips dick8
We're not looking at the bigger picture.
For a long time, 14"-21" CRT screens were all most people had. These days it's 42"-50" LED. TV's got thinner and we found more space. What's to stop standard screens getting wallpaper thin and taking up an entire wall? 4k and 8k would be really noticeable in that scenario.
>>62937181
TRUE enthusiasts do not pirate because not all pirated content is treated equally. If the product is not well-known, you will NOT get the best possible quality and all of the features. Don't you want that?? Oh wait that's right you don't because you're from /pol/ and you only know about Lawrence of Arabia from IMDB'S top 250. Get outta here, man. This is why I'm splurging the $500 on this because you will NEVER find the bluray rips for every LUPIN special, and I want the best because I'm a genuine fan and care about the series.
http://www.amazon.co.jp/%E3%83%AB%E3%83%91%E3%83%B3%E4%B8%89%E4%B8%96-%E3%83%86%E3%83%AC%E3%83%93%E3%82%B9%E3%83%9A%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A3%E3%83%AB-BOX~TV-%E3%82%B9%E3%83%9A%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A3%E3%83%ABBD%E3%82%B3%E3%83%AC%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A7%E3%83%B3~-Blu-ray/dp/B00353SJDY/ref=pd_bxgy_74_img_2?ie=UTF8&refRID=1YPK35ZD0PD1F4M25RHQ
>>62937254
Best I could find was a 8gb rip, that being said what really intrigues me is your fanatical devotion to Blu-Ray and hatred of 4K, if you're whole reason for loving blu-ray compared to rips is the better picture quality then wouldn't 4K be even better?
>>62937323
yea no.
you are a very limited person who can not see past his love for gook cartoons.
>>62937341
Because 1080p is perfect, my tv is basically perfect, and we DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT need 4k.
>>62937323
>le /pol/
>This is why I'm splurging the $500 on this because you will NEVER find the bluray rips for every LUPIN special, and I want the best because I'm a genuine fan and care about the series
Mate, you're such a fag
>>62937323
Took me literally 30 seconds to find a 30gb per movie rip of that entire collection on a private animu tracker
>>62936574
So, it would make sense to have 4K if you have a TV half the size of a theater
HURRRRRRR
>>62935720
That's only Sony's list, and they also said
> followed by a growing roster of titles including new release film and television content.
I wonder what the first television series to get a 4K Bluray release will be.
>Alexandra's Mammarios in 4K.
Fox has announced these to be released on 4K Bluray
>Exodus: Gods and Kings
>Kingsman: The Secret Service
>Fantastic Four
>X-Men: Days of Future Past
>Life of Pi
>The Maze Runner
>Wild
>>62937351
No I don't like gook cartoons. I only love Lupin and a few anime films. I'm not from /a/ and would never be caught dead there.
good goy, remember to upgrade to 16k when 8k becomes obsolete in 2018! and 32k in 2021!
>>62937323
I mean like I absolutely get your point to some extent, especially as someone who's pirated every piece of Lupin III media that has had seeders over the past three years, but the problem is that most people don't have $500 (goddamn the yen is weak these days) to drop on a bluray box set
>>62937404
>No I don't like gook cartoons. I only love Lupin and a few anime films
Way to immediately contradict yourself.
This thread is too confused. I literally have no idea what each person is arguing for anymore
>>62937390
screenshot it fag or it didn't fucking happen
>>62937420
It doesn't matter.
Everyone just ends up watching them on their shitty laptops at 3 in the morning.
>>62935826
Actually 35mm is thought to be roughly equivalent to 4k which is the vast majority of films. Any many films from the last 10 years are shot in native 4K digital.
not loads have had 4K masters yet though
But overall 4K releases generally aren't likely to be upscaled, this is a lie.
>>62937385
Kek, 1080 isn't even close to the level cinema picture quality and is downright pathetic compared to IMAX quality, admittedly 4K only barely reaches cinema picture quality and far below IMAX quality
>>62937393
no.
4k is noticeable at 55+ sizes.
>>62937385
>Because 240i is perfect, my tv is basically perfect, and we DO NOT, I repeat, DO NOT need 1080p.
>>62937445
Well, I'm glad you have an IMAX setup in your room.
>>62937405
8K is literally the limit of the number of pixels that the human eye can perceive you colossal retard, there is nothing after 8K, just better and better colour reproduction
http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/eye-resolution.html
>>62937443
lol pretty much
i want a 50ish in 4k tv at some point but until the content is there and i have a good enough connection to stream it whats the point
The jews will only be happy when everybody has bought an imax screen for themselves
10TB SINGLE DISK HDDS ARE OUT, 8TB HDDS ARE UNDER 200BUX
JUST DOWNLOAD THE 4K REMUXES TBQH
AND 4K STREAMING IS BITSTARVED SHIT NO MATTER WHAT NETFLIX AND AMAZON SAY
>>62936593
You have the blu-Ray which was remastered in 4K (ie they scanned the original film elements at 4K) before compressing to 1080p. This still provides better picture quality than the old master they were using (as it allows for better compression/more details) but it's still 1080p you are watching the film in
>>62937468
>he doesn't have a whole IMAX theatre in his living room
Go back to plebbit you fucking casual, you don't belong on /tv/
>>62937444
>trips
anyway, you're right but also at the same time you've gotta realize that some companies absolutely are gonna just upscale previously existing scans/masters and apply awful digital noise reduction and color filtering and call it good just like some blurays do even now
>>62937483
>8K is literally the limit of the number of pixels that the human eye can perceive you colossal retard
Until in the future people get eye implants that improve on the standard human vision. It'll happen m8.
I think the main theme of this thread is "technology is moving WAY too fucking fast."
Shit all my friends still buy dvds even though they have 1080p led's
Post your plasmas niggers not a 1080, but it gets the job done http://m.shop.panasonic.com/support-only/TC-42PX14.html
>>62937444
> implying they wont just upscale Blu-Rays and sell them as 4k movies
>>62937500
you will be 100% wasting your money on a "4k" tv that is below 55.
also to the plebs out there who are waiting for black friday weekend to get a 4k TV "door busters" dont waste your fucking money.
they are black friday models made cheaply from left over parts and skimp out on HDMI ports and you end up with a 60htz pile of shit.
>>62937060
Lot of plebs and misinformation in these threads
>>62937060
> being this shit at piracy
>>62937527
Some company claims to have made an eye implant that consistently gives patients 20/08 vision(vision more than twice as good as 20/20 vision)
The future looks bright
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/ocumetics-bionic-lens-could-give-you-vision-3x-better-than-20-20-1.3078257
>>62937552
BEHOLD /V/ THE PINNACLE OF PICTURE QUALITY. BEGONE 4K WIZARDS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoW3yp8U6S8
>>62937601
Why do you say oled is worse than plasma?
>>62937323
THAT SHIT IS INSTANTLY POSTED TO SHARE
UNTOUCHED BDMV
>>62937601
>dat motion blur
ill stick with my OLED.
>>62937566
>you will be 100% wasting your money on a "4k" tv that is below 55.
lel, my 4K monitor is less than 55 inches and the difference in picture quality is drastic when it's side by side with my old 1080 monitor
>>62937526
>some companies absolutely are gonna just upscale previously existing scans/masters
yeah no different then early HDtv was really good and pushing all 19+ Mb/s on pretty much every station. Then came the whole HDtv roll out wheb it became the new standard f or broadcast and all of a sudden network started to slash the rate down. More and more sub station BS.
Many of my local stations are now down to 14 Mb/s.. Oh but hey we get 2 new super shitty sub stations. yaaa..
>>62935922
>Guys is it bad that I DON'T want 4k to take off?
Yes.
I wouldn't worry about 1080p Bluray though. It will be around for as long as DVD has, if not longer.
>>62937637
>wasted money
>demand you did not by denying reality
>>62935913
Also may as well just buy the movie. The first 300 gig disks will probably be $20 Each.
>>62937527
>colossal retard
Meme response on the same tier as "mongoloid" I doubt you have ever had an original thought
>>62937631
show me then. STILL no one has taken a screenshot.
>>62937635
you poor, poor, poor, poor, poor fucking soul
>>62937637
>moniotor
/v/ you're making this way too fucking easy to spot you.
>>62937659
If you can't tell the difference then you're the blind one. You probably haven't seen a 4k monitor in person
>>62937659
Funny you should mention that since the screen was actually a gift, I was planning on waiting a couple more years before upgrading, what really surprised me is that even 1080 content looks better on a 4K screen
>Sony says a steady flow of titles will follow the launch lineup and points to its growing vault of recent blockbusters and classics that've seen 4K restorations. Those include:
> Fury, Captain Phillips, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Men In Black, Ghostbusters, The Fifth Element, Bad Boys, The Da Vinci Code, Bram Stoker's Dracula, Leon: The Professional, Lawrence Of Arabia, The Bridge on the River Kwai, The Guns of Navarone, Taxi Driver, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington
Milla Jovovich's sexy costume in The Fifth Element in 4K
Natalie Portman at her sexiest giving her best performance in 4K
:^)
>>62937697
THE DISPLAY IS SHARPER
IT STOPS BEING NOTICEABLE ONCE YOU REACH A CERTAIN DISTANCE
PC MONITORS ARE VIEWED FROM CLOSE COMPARED TO TVS
Good goys
>>62937323
>cowboy bebop on land
>>62937635
he has the 3d on in pic-related, you fucking retard.
>>62937619
OLED HAS WORSE COLOR AND MOTION RESOLUTION THAN PLASMA AT THE MOMENT. IF YOU ENJOY FILMS AND NOT VIDEO GAMES BUY A FUCKING PLASMA. OH WAIT YOU'RE SHIT OUTTA LUCK I BOUGHT THE LAST ONE.
>>62937688
i can afford to buy a new one in a few years when it dies.
until then ill be enjoying the best screen quality since they no longer make plasmas.
>>62937692
>n no science is wrong about how well eyes can see packed pixels
>>62937713
You can actually already watch Lawrence of Arabia in 8K if you're willing to spend $20 000 buying an 8K screen
>>62937737
no shit.
still better than regular LED screens.
>>62937713
>Men in Black 1
When can I see muh girl in 4k?
i won't since i do not have a 4k television
>>62936218
At around 2 feet in distance the human eye can make out 170 DPI.
So if you have say a 30" monitor and sit around 2 feet from it, anything greater than 4400 x 2600 would be useless.
ITT: reddit goys that can't into private trackers
>>62935479
Wait, is that pic real?
I thought the name of the new +300 gb capacity disc was Archival Dics
>>62935479
>niggers
>waaaaaagggh why can't be MUH ARYANS and kill da k**e jooooooooooooooooos and da n****rs, I’m a dumb right wing bigot!!
Every thread. Look, what you need to understand is that you whites a are blood thirsty racists with some sort of sick superiority complex , but you know what’s worse?
you were fighting for a guy who murdered in cold blood easily at least 600 million+ Jewish, indian, native American, gypsy, African, afro American, south American, south east Asian, and Chinese people, including women and children, for no fucking reason and wanted to turn several hundred million’s of Black men, women and children into slaves.
So fuck you. You are wrong side of humanity. You deserve a painful death
4chan was always liberal, and pro LGBTQALMNOP before stormfront hacked /pol/ onto 4chan. Racism was never on /tv/. 4Chan never had an undercurrent of white males, libertarians and MRAs posting their political views.
If you're not posting from your 65-inch plasma but instead on a measly monitor, you can get the fuck off this board. Having /v/ open in another tab qualifies for b& from upcoming /film/ board as well.
Wow, it's like /v/ invaded this forum...nothing but bitching about resolutions in home media.
You guys are sad
>>62937835
>STATIC MENUS ON UR 65" PLASMA
BREH, SAVE THAT PANEL FOR MOVIES
ITS A COLLECTORS ITEM NOW, AND STILL SUPERIOR TO ANY OTHER PANEL DISPLAY ON THE MARKET
>>62937832
trying 2 hard pham
>>62937835
he's right.>>62937870
good lookin' out for a fellow anon.
>>62937827
They are, and they're going to be fucking expensive. Probably about $50-$75 a Disk. They apparently have a 50 year life cycle and don't require specific temperatures to be stored in to maintain that life cycle.
just wanna say nice discussion here guys. I'm planning on upgrading our old 32 inch tv that I bought way back in 2009. Since my wife and I barely watch tv and I just mostly use for my ps3, I think its timely that I upgrade our tv as well to a 80+ inch or more. I'm still thinking if 4k is worth it though.
>>62937897
Blu-ray cost almost that much when they were first released, the price will sink like a stone within a couple of years, especially now that they have to compete with Netflix and Amazon offering 4K content
>>62937943
I'd recommend waiting a year or two but buying a high end 1080 screen today is like buying a VHS player in 2005
>>62937943
Don't be a fool and wait for 8K, 4K is going to be replaced very quickly, 8K is where it's at
>>62937943
DISPLAYS ABOVE 60" VIEWED FROM TV DISTANCES WILL BENEFIT FROM 4K
PLASMA IS UNBUYABLE SO REALLY ANYTHING YOURE BUYING TODAY SHOULD BE 4K BECAUSE WHY NOT
>>62938003
>Don't be a fool, get 8K in 2019
>>62935913
>downloading 300gb movie
>>62935922
>Why is everything rushing so fast? Why do we need another standard?
It's called capitalism and living in a consumerist society full of sheeps. Until you realize most consumer "innovations" are not actually significant improvements and are only a way to milk consumers with new TVs, computer screens, players and discs, you won't get out of the cycle.
>>62938037
nigga those are 3 YEARS from now, 3 years to make a real a REAL investment, wait for the next big shit or throw your money down the toilet, it's up to you
>>62938041
Would take less than half an hour with my internet connection, feels good man
>>62937956
The thing is Blu-Ray disks aren't being marketed as archival disks and they don't have a 50 year lifespan (which is 7x longer than a HD lifespan). They won't really drop in price as companies will be buying them
>>62937943
Okay, 4k is not standard yet and won't be for maybe 3-5+ years. PS4/Xboxes don't support 4k, while only a handful of televisions and players support 4k natively.
A lot of content that is streamed at 4k on Netflix and Sony's service don't infact have 4k detail, like the new Jessica Jones and other content. A lot of P2P encoders are ripping @4k - 2160p and downscaling to 1080p. IIRC, 4k webrips are over 100gbs, this just means greater grain retention, not necessarily more detail.
In other words, it's just not worth it at the moment. You can get a cheap 1080p HD tv and you'll be sweet for years to come
>>62938106
>Would take less than half an hour with my internet connection
cool story bro. your hard drive won't be able to write 300gb in half an hour though.
>>62937552
Kek, I'm watcing Tomorrow Never Dies on one of these beasts.
>720p native res
Still gets shit done.
>>62938174
PS4 and X-Box couldn't support 4k even if they wanted to. The GPU power just isn't there. Maybe by next gen, but even then I doubt it. Next gen will have to decide if it wants 4k support or better graphics. They won't be able to do both.
>>62938190
Actually it can, not all of us post on /tv/ using shitty ten year old laptops
>>62938226
>Talking about console power
THAT'S STRIKE 3 /V/. GET THE FUCK OUT. NO ONE WHO GENUINELY LOVES FILM WANTS A 4K TV.
>>62938226
CONSOLES ARE FOREVER PLEB
PC MASTER RACE, QUAD SLI
PCS BEEN DRIVING TRIMONITOR RIGS ABOVE 8K EFFECTIVE RESOLUTION FOR YEARS
>>62938226
>They won't be able to do both.
It's not that difficult to build a PC that can play games at 4K with the highest graphics settings, I really doubt that 4K with better graphic will be impossible for consoles by the time the PS5 comes out
>>62938014
>BUYING TODAY SHOULD BE 4K BECAUSE WHY NOT
I think if a person is buying a very large set they don't have all that many high end options and are forced into 4k. Yet if it's looking for something in the 50ish or smaller size might as well buy cheaper 1080p
being the tech will still leap forward and the prices will keep dropping and one can just upgrade again in a few more years. Spending the money you save off buying a cheaper set now.
I guess the trade off is not watching the best of the best now. Mostly I'm shocked at how cheap tv have gotten compared to even a few years ago.
Heh, since it's completely obvious /v/'s in this thread and has infiltrated /tv/ as a whole in an attempt to feel "cultured" after watching RLM or YMS, I have to ask this. Are you advocating 60-120fps in film? Do you turn on motion smoothing on your led and say "LOOK, DAD IT'S BETTER NOW"?
>>62938307
Dude I have a 980ti and even Fallout 4 cannot get a steady 60 FPS at 4k res. And in busy areas it struggles to hit even 30FPS. And that's a $900 card.
The jump in resolution from even 1080 to 1440 is pretty a big strain on the GPU.
You got to keep in mind that the consoles are always behind. Christ I have a 5 year old graphics card sitting in my house that's more powerful than the current gen consoles GPU.
>>62935479
really sucks that we have perfect home theater technology and we're stuck with these shitty ass modern movies "filmed" in digital.
but once they get older movies and content in 4K I'll jump in fully. 1080p is good but 4k is the sweet spot for true home theater.
>>62935922
>every classic you can think of
doubt it. unless you have them on vhs and laserdisc.
>>62935720
>4k Angelina Jolie
I hope they release the Tomb Raider movies on 4k. I'm one of those faggots who usually doesn't give a fuck about muh sexy women, but Jolie is on a whole other level.
>There will never be a proper BR/4K release of Gaia
>>62935922
>Will 4k please die?
no dumbass. a niche market for 4k content would be great. hopefully it would take off better than laserdisc did.
I had a 1080p TV for a year insisted that I watched HD and saying that I could tell the difference. I found out that I was short sighted and could not see a difference.
but yeah I want a 4K OLED TV.
Anybody got this? http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2477315,00.asp
Oh no? THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET OFF MY BOARD
>>62936968
>color correction
I really hate that they do this with re-releases. I don't buy as much as I'd want to because of that.
I KNEW ABOUT OLED FIRST I WAS THERE FIRST!! I BET NONE OF YOU /V/ BABIES KNEW ABOUT IT UNTIL A FEW MONTHS AGO FROM ONE OF YOUR SPONSORED YOUTUBERS. DO YOU EVEN FOLLOW CNET?? DO YOU GO TO CES??
>>62937254
>no one cares about betamax which is why it died.
it died last year, or this year.
betamax stuck around for a long fucking time in television production mostly.
>physical media
TO THE OVENS WITH YOU
>>62935955
>investing
wrong choice of words for buying something that instantly became worthess the second you took posession of it
>>62937319
were almost there actually. they already have thin flexible oled screens now.
so this is how torrenting ends? *cue thunderous applause*
with 1tb films that are easier to get by simply buying them, because internet infastructure will take decades to reach the speeds requried.
well played sony and the movie studios... well played.
>>62938760
OLED HAS BEEN A BUSTED ASS DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY IN PHONES FOR YEARS
OLED HAS PROBLEMS WITH PIXEL AGING, IT WEARS UNEVENLY AND THE BLUES GO TO SHIT PREMATURELY
OLED IS FINE IF YOURE PREPARED TO CHUCK THE PANEL IN 2 YEARS, AKA A CELLPHONE CYCLE
>>62937385
>1080p is perfect
pfft. 10800p is blurry as shit when you know the difference.
>>62938703
no. but I have this.
mostly used for practicing smash
I'll start buying 4K movies after the first couple years. They always improve encoding and come out with specialized anniversary versions anyway. First couple of Blu-Ray releases were MPEG-2 bullshit. The next couple had massive DNR & EE shit applied.
>>62938819
YIFY 2.0 IS ON IT
THE TRANSCODING PLEBS WILL BE THERE FOR USERS WITH PLEB INTERNET AND/OR PLEB HARDDRIVE
>>62937601
I fucking hate plasmas. it was nice when they were first announced but the degradation over the years is abysmal.
>>62938840
CANT WAIT FOR 4K CHOCO ARNIE
>>62938895
PLASMA IS THE ULTIMATE MOVIE SCREEN
IT HAS THE BEST MOTION REPRODUCTION OF ANY DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
DONT TREAT A GOOD PLASMA LIKE SHIT, AKA USING IT AS A COMPUTER MONITOR
>>62938848
whats the point then. youd just take the stnadard edition,which will still be available because its gonna be a century (if ever) until 4k is as ubiquitous as SDTV's have been proir to the introduciton of HDMI.#
until the crapshack in the mumbai slum has 4k, you'll still have SDTV and HDTV versions released.
>>62938926
PLEBS LIKE BIG NUMBERS, ESPECIALLY RESOLUTION
THE NEXT YIFY WILL DO 4K HEVC ENCODES (AT .5 MBIT)
B-BUT ITS 4K!
>>62938963
But it's HEVC!
>>62938280
>NO ONE WHO GENUINELY LOVES FILM WANTS A 4K TV
we want an 8k projector.
or an actual film projector with adjoining sound system.
>>62938963
fagget, OLED is god tier, dat brightness. dat black levels.
>>62938690
I think you have more problems if your tv is talking to you.
>>62938703
>LG
why is everything LG now?
did they get better manufacturers? they used to make the cheapest fucking tvs and cell phones.
>>62937445
Actually what you see in 90% of cinemas is 2k, which is 1080p. Cinema has a wider color space, and better chroma subsampling.
>>62938820
I've had my SG1 for over 3 years. still looks just as good as when I got it. 't.
>>62938989
>YFW ITS ALMOST2016AND HEVC IS STILL SHITTIER THAN AVC
THERES NO MAGIC COMPRESSION, AND HARDWARE HEVC DECODE IS FAR FROM WIDESPREAD
>>62939032
TV PANEL OLED IS 3RD GENERATION AT BEST, OLED IS HALF BAKED
OLED CANT TOUCH PLASMAS MOTION
PLASMA WAS 18TH GENERATION TECHNOLOGY, REFINED TO AN ART, 4K PLASMA WAS JUST RELEASING TO CONSUMERS
>>62938923
I used it for movies. 3 plasmas in a row fucked out on me. screen was great. colors, blacks, all good. but after a while the screen degraded horribly, and it got grainy and eventually developed white dots all over the screen.
sent it back and got a brand new one. did the same thing. sent that back and got a new different model. this one worked until the screen kept turning off for no reason . then it developed the same grainy bullshit.
then circuit city went bankrupt and now I'm stuck with a shitty plasma that decides when it wants to stay on .
nah, fuck plasmas.
>>62939173
SOUNDS LIKE A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROBLEM
SOME MODELS ARE SHIT
LATE GENERATION PDP HAS 100,000 HRS TILL 10% BRIGHTNESS DROP
The Maze Runner is the only 4K movie coming out in the first batch, the rest are upscaled
Anyway the 4K Blu-Rays are a bit of a disappointment since they are only 100GB's, which limits them a bit, if they wanted 10bit 4.4.4 with a higher bit rate than Blu-Ray then it should have been 200GB minimum
Plus no 3D, Avatar in 4K/60fps in 3D would have been lovely, but no, 3D in 60fps is quite nice while in 24fps it's kind of a pain on the eyes
>>62939032
One of the problems with OLED is the relative lack of brightness, so the HDR implementation isn't great yet. And HDR makes a much better improvement to current standards than the resolutuion increase from 2k to 4k.
>>62939032
OLED degrades & has burn in, it's just a more expensive Plasma
>>62939215
the first two were LG and the last one was samsung.
either circuit city was selling me junk as if it was new or the plkasma production from ythose companies were ass.
but I never cared for plasma that much anyway. Every seen I've seen has that grainy look with its pixels.
>>62939098
you seem to forget that cinemas don't use video encoding technology, but instead JPEG2000.
>>62939233
Burn in has been solved in latest OLEDs.
>>62939233
how the fuck does oled have burn in?
ITT Pkeks from /v/
>not buying a nice DLP+3LCD projector & 120"+ screen
enjoy being pleb
>>62939260
No, fully aware of that. The resolution you see in 90% of cinemas is 2048x858 for scope / 1998x1080 for flat. The simple resolution doesn't explain why cinema is better, it's due to the color space, chroma, etc. Try putting bluray on a 40ft screen - it's actually pretty good.
>>62939314
>DLP
can't believe this is still a thing. has the resolution of the chips gone up? they used to be really blocky and pixelated.
>>62939265 >>62939282
YOU CAN BURN IN ANYTHING WITH CERTAIN USAGE, INCLUDING LCDS
>>62939314
ENJOY YOUR BLOWN OUT CONTRAST WITHOUT A BLACKED OUT ROOM, AND EVEN IN PITCH BLACK A BRIGHTNESS LEVEL NOWHERE NEAR A PANEL DISPLAY
>>62937483
you're quite the autist, friendo
>>62939369
stop yelling
>>62937588
>meme arrowing like a redditor
fuck off, reddit
>>62939282
>>62939369
DID THIS /V/ SHITTER REALLY JUST SAY HOW DOES OLED HAVE BURN-IN?? SERIOUSLY GET THE FUCK OFF MY OARD. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT HERE. GO TO /A/ OR SOMETHING IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT A VISUAL STORYTELLING MEDIUM. AND LEAVE THE DISCUSSION FOR US /TV/ ELITES.
>>62937810
This is completely inaccurate. You won't be able to see the pixels but you'll still see the image as clearer overall.
>>62937770
link please?
>>62939422
nigga you love plasma. the most burn in device ever. gtfo with your capslock.
>>62938825
C-can I come over and play?
The loser has to suck the winner's cock!
Its not gay its just a bet haha
>>62939282
Even the early pro models I used at work eventually suffered from burn-in. Latest gen are fine.
>tfw I only care about refresh rate and literally nothing else
I think 4K would lower piracy if they advertised its the same quality as cinema
I mean a decent rip would be something about 50GB?
>>62935479
is this an audiophile threat?
>>62939489
>ANOTHER /V/EDDITOR
LEMME GUESS YOU ONLY CARE ABOUT MOTION SMOOTHING TECHNOLOGY AS WELL?
>studio makes 4k movie
>takes 6 years to render
>>62939443
THE LAST GENERATION OF PLASMA HAS LOW IMAGE RETENTION AND ALMOST NO IMAGE PERSISTENCE WITH PIXEL ORBITING AND A DIFFERENT TYPE OF PHOSPHOR LAYER
YOU CAN STILL BURN IT IN, JUST LIKE YOU CAN BURN ANYTHING IN
THE WAY THEY TEST BURN IN IN THE LAB IS REMOVING THE BRIGHTNESS LIMITER AND DISPLAYING A WHITE ON BLACK CHECKERBOARD IMAGE FOR RAPID PIXEL AGING
>>62939438
I'm saying the eye can spot differences withing the 170 DPI range, we might not see the pixels, but we can see color changes, etc. Anything more than 170 DPI and we cannot see a change.
>>62939494
>not watching Coalgirls 120GB anime encodes
>not watching RARBG 6GB 4k movie encodes
>>62939494
More than that. It's not the resolution itself, it's the expanded color gamut etc.
To complicate things a lot of popular movies aren't truly 4k res due to cost of effects, eg Age of Ultron effects (so basically the entire movie) were rendered in 2k.
>>62935479
I'll wait for 16k or whatever shit comes after.
>>62939575
28 Days Later in 4K. Holy shit that's a nightmare.
>>62939570
OH LOOK NOW HERE'S /A/. NOW IT'S A FUCKING PARTY. GET THE FUCK OUT.
>>62939598
GO 20K OR GO HOME
70MM IMAX FILM IS THEORETICAL 18K
THE DIGITAL INTERMEDIATE IS USUALLY MUCH LOWER RES SO IT BECOMES THE BOTTLENECK, THATS WHERE SHIT GETS LOST
>>62939653
u mad bro? u seem mad
>>62939531
Yes we can. I bet you think we can't see over 60fps either.
>>62939575
> it's the expanded color gamut
Would one need need a monitor with an expanded color gamut, for instance, to see a screen capture of a scene from a 4K BD in all its glory or is the color gamut of 4K BD / BD limited beneath what a relatively new monitor can display?
>torrenting a non-yify less than 1GB rip of a movie that I heard is good
Enjoy wasting money and time on stupid shit like entertainment.
>>62939674
The visual resolution of the human eye is about 1 arc minute.
At a viewing distance of 20″, that translates to about 170 dpi (or pixels-per-inch / PPI), which equals a dot pitch of around 0.14 mm. LCD monitors today have a dot pitch of .18mm to .24mm.
A 30″ monitor with a 16:9 aspect ratio would be sized around 26″ x 15″. To achieve 170 dpi, it would need a resolution of 4400 x 2600 pixels
If you want to lean in closer, say to 10″, and still not see the pixels, then you would need to double that resolution.”
>>62936046
>>62937084
>>62937111
>>62937134
Lawrence of Arabia IS on the list. The current (downscale) BD is 70GB though so the 4k will be huge.
>>62937060
AYYYY GET REKD
>>62935922
Just keep an old tv. TVs from before 2000 still exist and work for VHS fags, 00s tech won´t just desintegrate immediately.
Reminder that almost all CGI work is in 2K/1080p.
>>62937060
W E W
E
W
>>62939973
Resolution is shit though. I think the highest they can obtain is 720, or maybe 1080.
