It's been over four years now, did you watch it?
>>62926133
No, because I'm American and don't care.
My school made us watch it, i'm a burger btw
>>62926133
we don't worship monarchs here in america so no
>>62926133
No, because I'm Britbong and don't care.
>>62926928
The things you worship are worse than monarchy ťbh
>>62926133
I feel so bad for them. They're gonna have to convert to islam or flee the country.
>>62926928
More Americans watched it than Brits
>being this keked
>>62926133
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNk631AthP0
>>62926133
I just saw highlights, I didn't watch it. I remember at one point Kate had pokie nipples, that's about it.
>>62926979
we have more people and it was on in the dead of night for us
do the math. people who fall asleep with the TV on "watched" it.
Hahahaha, why would I?
>>62926133
jew
>>62927008
>it was on in the dead of night for us
No it wasn't >>62926886 i clearly remember watching it at school
>>62927050
are you a east coast kek? explains why you were watching it
>>62927008
>He thinks there are devices in all American TVs that report what people are watching
>He thinks that it could only be watched live
So much denial.
I preferred the original, to be honest.
>>62926133
We had a lot of public places like the libraries that were showing it live to lots of people here in Canada. We're part of the British commonwealth of nations. Honestly it's fucking retarded how people could give a shit about an obsolete family's wedding.
>>62927310
>He thinks there are devices in all American TVs that report what people are watching
you think people with nielsen boxes don;t fall asleep to the tv too?
>>He thinks that it could only be watched live
that's where the viewer number comes from
>>62926133
No because I'm a normie and was getting my dick wet.
>>62926979
A lot of people watched it in Canada. "Omg did you see the royal wedding?" fucking christ. I'm glad I'm on vacation right now, don't want to be anywhere near Canada with That Trudeau fuck in office.
>>62927165
Does Buckingham Palace have nude paintings of all the Doctor Whos?
>>62927392
Of course.
>>62927323
>>62927333
>that's where the viewer number comes from
Just think about it for a second ... if those figures are for the live viewing, how much larger would the audience be if the "delayed viewing" crowd were also counted? Because it was broadcast in the middle of the night for half the country so who's going to stay up for that? \many people watched it hours after it happened, but they still watched it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbP3ax9pC4c
>>62927568
>how much larger would the audience be if the "delayed viewing" crowd were also counted?
not very much. listen, the only people who care about your british kings and queens here in america are teenage girls and they all woke up early to watch it.
>>62927323
lol
>You will never get to cum inside some hot brunette simply because of your bloodline
>>62927631
You're still in denial, and you sound desperate to be believed.
>>62926928
>>62926843
That's strange because 23 million Americans watched the royal wedding. That's more than the Britbongs.
>>62927857
Most brits can't afford the license.
>>62927631
>teenage girls
How would you know this?
Nielson didn't have a "teenage grill" demographic in 2011.
In 2011 Nielson concentrated on the 25 - 54 age group.
>>62926133
If I wanted to see two inbred chucklefucks get married, I'd go to the Ozarks.
I tried watching it but turned it off after 10 mins. I don't understand how William came out so ugly in comparison to his brother Harry. They should've bumped up Harry in line of succession. Looks like Limeys are gonna have two ugly monarchs back to back: that bloke charles and his balding inbred looking son william.
Toppest of keks.
>>62930114
>inbred looking
But anon, he IS inbred
>>62927907
Yeah, they all knew the Royal Wedding was a sting operation to see who was watching content illegally due to lack of TV license
