>>62906793
You're shit.

Na mate it's a solid 8.5/10

>>62906793
You're a cunt you doesn't deserve anything nice

>>62906793
/tv/ was split on this.

Most of us hated it.

Yet there was a vocal minority that kept posting about it implying it was good.

I came out of it with many negative feelings, I'm not a critic but here we go:

Movie seemed to change theme a few times,

First it felt like a grizzly true detective,

then I thought showing all the corpses meant we'd follow that line,

Then the bomb, I'd thought they'd follow that line,

then the plot and scenes just seemed to go in the strangest direction.

Long boring shoots with scary music.

Emily Blunt's sad face.

The Mexican cop waking up each morning - it was obvious he was going to die.

I came out of it not knowing what I just watched, it was a huge fuzz, a massive gray area. No distinctive theme, main character, story, country or area.

>>62906843
Have you considered that you may be too retarded to follow a simple story?

>>62906793
You should have watched Narcos.

>>62906854
>>62906832
>>62906806
Go to bed Denis

>>62906843
>I'm not a critic

It's obvious.

>>62906843
Yea, you don't know how to critique movies, just stop

been saying its shit since these threads started popping up .. film had potential but they blew it with having a women lead role .. ruins the whole movie desu .. just not a believable character

>>62906865
Kill yourself.

>>62906858
Soderbergh's "Traffic" is the best there is !!!!

File: 1382311212333.jpg (228 KB, 1024x921) Image search: [Google]

228 KB, 1024x921

ITT: people who watched a camrip on their laptops while shitposting on /tv/.
No, really. Fucking kill yourselves.

the script was shallow, like...its was pretty empty to fill a 2 hour film.

The film had a lot of potential, I didnt mind that it was slow-paced but the story was meh.

Decent cinematography and all but it could have been so much better.