>kubrik
>flick
Back in my day trolling meant something frogshitter.
>kubrick
>flick
Everyone knows its kino
>>62809506
he's a reeeeeeeeeedditor, you can't expect much
>>62809420
Dr. Strangelove.
It amuses me and I can rewatch it whenever without it getting old. It's probably not his best objectively speaking, but it's my favorite. The dark comedy and combination of sincere performances (George C. Scott, Slim Pickens) combined with the tongue in cheek comedic performances (Peter Sellers, Peter Sellers, Peter Sellers) makes it stand out for me. I also have a little bit of a boner for cold war fiction.WEEEEEE'LLL MEEET AGAAAAAAIINNN
None, as Kubrick is entry level cinema, he's not even good.
He was a cinematographer, not a director. He can't create a story worth a dam.
If I HAD to pick one though? Probably Clockwork.
͏>hasn't put out a good movie in literally half a century
͏>filmc͏ucks still fawn over him
why
Eyes Wide Shut followed by 2001.
I just love the atmosphere in this movie.
>>62809590
Probably this. My Dad showed it to me when I was too young to appreciate it (same with 2001). Watched it years later and laughed my fucking ass off. Not his best but so rewatchable.
YAA YAA
YAA YAA YAAAAA YAA
YAA YAA YAAAA YAA
YAA YAA YAA YAA
>cinema absolute
Lolita
>kino
Barry Lyndon
>film
2001
>movie
The Shining
>flick
A Clockwork Orange
>>62809593
>He was a cinematographer, not a director. He can't create a story worth a dam.
This.
I would pick Barry Lyndon though. Maybe not the one with the best cinematography (that would be Shining) but the best all around. A good 7/10.
2001, dear OP.
Was my first step in understanding film language.
>>62810119
Exact same as me
>>62810669
Cheers comfybro
