What have you been watching?
>its a hating on Clueless episode
not a good look fåm
>>62748010
>>62748159
>image.jpg
kill yourselves, apple drones
>>62748860
>poorfag
lmaoing @ your life
>>62748860
I'm sorry you can't afford the best phone available on the market. maybe if you save up.
>>62748894
>>62748905
ah, the typical ``you're poor'' response which only shows that the users of apple products care more about their image than functionality
yes, you're soooo rich with your apple phone that 50 million other people have! so unique! so cool! so trendy!
lmao, fucking drones
KILL YOURSELVES
nah lol
>>62749082
those pesky hecking apple drones!!!!!!! to heck!!!!!!!!
What are some movies about Love™
vulva, how come you have multiple reviews not in vulva-speak? What's the story there?
is this the worst bio or what?
>>62751160
>puts kubrick and hitch on blast
>with those favorites
obviously a parody account
nobody can lack that much self-awareness
>>62751160
It's fake, it has to be
>>62751373
>>62751429
http://letterboxd.com/kraye826/
nope
>>62751458
aaaaand of course she doesn't like Woody Allen, what a walking cliché
>>62750594
fixed like a master
>>62750594
dammit why did you have to bring it up
more like Bump General
Said in the other thread I was going to watch one more Jess Franco film before giving up but now I'm getting 3, are Bloody Moon, Vampyros Lesbos and She Killed in Ecstacy the best examples of his work?
Also on a kind of related note, which are the best Mario Bava films? It occurred to me today I've only seen one
>>62751160
thedeathoflbg.com
>>62751654
woody allen is a walking cliche
>>62753979
but he invented that cliché.
why is there not more vulvaposting!! itt!!!!!
>>62754012
woody allen didnt invent the psuedo-intellictual kike meme
>>62754212
he did invent the pseudo intellectual bumbling beta male kike though.
how do i change movie posters on lb? i mean i suppose i can't, but it breaks my heart
like look at how much pic related is better than the one on the site
http://letterboxd.com/film/samurai-rebellion/
>>62754586
and it's not that they fail to choose the best one between versions, but they use fan-made minimalistic shit
some are not bad, but most of them are aweful, why can't we just use the original ones??
>>62754586
You can change it, you just need to change the poster on the movie database:
https://www.themoviedb.org
I think you need an account there. Then just notify the Letterboxd team that the poster was changed and they'll modify it.
>>62754705
well thats retarded, that would take too much effort for even 1 movie
>>62754975
Indeed, but to my knowledge that's the only way
>>62755069
>tfw Rostova's dead
>>62754049
its the saddest vulva day im 99% certain that i ate something with 100% pure animal torture in it.............................whip myself to tears breakdown anxiety world killing itself
>>62755410
good, one less beta male shitting up the gene pool
>read someone's well written reviews for over a year
>based off their manner of writing and avatar form a vague mental image of what they look like
>click the link to one of their short films
>spergy awkward 19 year old
every time
>>62754586
>>62754975
On RYM you just vote up or down the poster on-site. And no fan posters allowed. I hate those le minamalism criterion xD posters.
>>62755501
Did you just watch Worth It?
>>62755570
well i tried my best with Samurai Rebellion, if it works i'll be doing gods work with everything else, but i'm afraid the site will promote English posters only and the majority of those are criterion posters
>>62755501
Yeah hit 2 pass is shit
>>62756174
Thank you Anon, you'll tell us if it worked, right?
>>62756486
is the lobster any good?
Have you ever logged a movie you didn't watch entirely?
watching One, Two, Three tonight hopefully after the Gaytriots lose
>>62756552
Yes I thought it was great. Enjoyably bizarre and really quite funny.
>>62756557
I don't log a film unless I watch it again with commentary
>>62756557
Why must white liberals signal constantly
We get it, you think the terrorist attacks were bad. Try actually doing something about it besides posting a fucking Letterboxd review about how virtuous you are, like maybe not voting for people who flood your country with refugees
>>62749082
You're still poor dude
>>62756703
>white male lib
>doing something
yikes
>>62756703
what part of his post makes you think he's a liberal? moron
>>62754586
https://rateyourmusic.com/film/上意討ち_拝領妻始末
:p
is bleu still on mubi
>>62756850
Trannyboxd shill BTFO yet again
>>62756816
The part where he has to announce to the world via a fucking movie review how sad he is about the Paris attacks, thus making it about himself rather than the people killed in the attacks
>>62757205
I'm guessing you don't have a lot of friends or social interaction so I'll share a tidbit of knowledge with you.
People discuss current events with each other, even if it's just to express disgust over a terrorist attack or send commiserations to people murdered by a pack of wild durkas. It's literally one of the building blocks of human interaction. If you get out the house every once in awhile you'll learn not everything is some insidious liberal plot to get you to spread your cheeks for Syrian refugees.
>>62757378
>hurr durr you have no friends
Your projection is duly noted kiddo but my post was directed at a very specific type of shiftless liberal who would rather change his Facebook photo to a picture of the French flag superimposed over his face than take measures to ensure such attacks don't happen again. I know this because I actually do have friends and don't unironically accuse people of believing in an "insidious liberal plot" from the safety of his insulated suburban home
>>62757552
>who would rather change his Facebook photo to a picture of the French flag superimposed over his face than take measures to ensure such attacks don't happen again
What makes you think the guy doesn't do both?
>>62757552
>change his Facebook photo to a picture of the French flag superimposed
oh shit, thats what that is lmao
>>62757552
it's great to know you made this personality sketch based on the sentence
>When my phone started buzzing with news about Paris I turned it off with just 20 minutes to go.
You must be an astute judge of character with a well-paying job, girlfriend, and well-adjusted social life. Or you're a /pol/ browsing retard that turns any and every statement (no matter how innocuous) into a commentary on libruls and big black cocks.
>>62756557
I don't log a film unless I watch it in one sitting.
>>62756673
*tips fedroa*
>>62757924
why are you being mean?
>>62757805
I actually have all three of those things, but not only is it irrelevant to the discussion, you won't believe it anyway because it goes against your preconceived idea of everyone who disagrees with you being a fat /pol/ neckbeard. I don't browse /pol/ and you're the one who brought up black cocks. You should probably take some personal inventory
Also post profile because I'm now 99% sure you're the faggot whose review that anon posted and you're just fannyflustered that you got called out
>>62757786
The point is that nobody fucking cares that he stopped the film with 20 minutes to go because of the Paris attacks. Letterboxd is filed with shit white noise reviews just like that one and it's part of the reason why the site is so shit. But if that's what you'd like to encourage go ahead
>>62757999
/dropout_bear
follow back family ;)
>>62758196
(^:
>>62758196
happy to see josiah morgon isnt the only one that can make a shitty syndromes and a century blog post
>>62756207
haven't seen it but Here's To The Future! is amazing.
I regret becoming part of this community. You guys are real fucking downers.
>>62759279
>>62758714
absolutely yikes
>>62759279
Same. Everyone here really are massive pricks. Why the fuck did I think that a 4chan off-shot community wouldn't be filled with terrible people?
>>62748010
>Mubi
Is Mubi actually good for finding unknown stuff? Or do they just recommend generic entry level shit I already know about.
>>62760149
it's ok. most of the people who used it went to letterboxd so it's technically better, but mubi has tighter control over its database and the notebook, which is a really underrated resource that spotlights stuff you'll never hear about on lb.
>>62751160
>Villeneuve
I hate that his name is included among all that meme.
>>62760149
>Is Mubi actually good for finding unknown stuff?
it has some nice lists. the movies they stream are great, especially if you use hola to see what other countries get. the average user is considerably more knowledgeable than lb/rym/imdb. too bad they got rid of their forums.
>>62758714
Nice review
>>62760451
no it's not, dropout
>>62760270
sans Nolan he's the worst filmmaker there
when does this shit get interesting?
>>62759279
>>62760007
come join my site whenever it opens. all will be welcome. no memes allowed :)
>>62760629
He hasn't made a movie yet that wasn't great.
>>62761001
Man I can't wait. I'm just about ready to ditch Letterboxd and these awful threads.
>>62761001
>No memes allowed
>SPECTRE
You just joined anon's amazing new website. You're ready to start filling your profile full of excellent films.
Do you,
a.) Start adding every film you can remember seeing
b.) Start a fresh new list, only adding films you've watched since creating the account
>>62761184
I try and see all the new releases. It's a 2/5 at best :\
>>62761280
log all feature films
>>62761001
Is 0 friends better than having a few shitty friends? I don't know desu
>>62761001
looks too much like mubi or netflix
please add half stars
>>62761486
I'll just put it out there and see what grows. No pressure. Hopefully it will be lower maintenance than lb, which is feature-filled to the point of inanity.
I mean, really, who cares about stuff like a rating curve??
>>62761575
Fuck off, half stars are cancer. If you want a 10 point rating system then do -/10.
The whole purpose of the 5 star rating system is it's accessibility as a graphically presented 5 point rating system.
>>62761635
Just one guy, his name is JoJo.
>>62761575
>please add half stars
gah, I wrestled with that for ages and ended up going without them. half stars gives you the illusion of rating out of 5, but you're just rating out of 10.
at some point the scale has to be sufficient enough to not need pseudo-scientific tinkering, because you can't really put a number on subjectivity. I don't want some kind of Pitchfork-esque formula to the ratings. 5 is enough.
Rotten tomatoes got big off of turing-style binary ratings anyway. The simpler you get across your taste to an audience, the better.
>>62761117
haha oh wow
>>62761751
Nice memes.
>>62761791
villenevoovoo is a meme, as is your taste in film
http://letterboxd.com/KAwAiRetard/films/
>>62761820
Shitposting doesn't make you look smart.
>>62761885
doesn't make him wrong either
>>62761737
>The simpler you get across your taste to an audience, the better.
then make it like/dislike. the simpler the better, right?
seriously though, i do find that 5 stars makes it harder when seeking out new films because it misses that added specificity and makes you less sure of what youre getting into. that distinction between 7 & 8 (out of 10) is important imo
>>62761931
Referring to yourself in third person doesn't make it seem like more people are on your side.
>>62761885
what I posted was no more shitposting than unironically saying "villeneuve has never made a film that wasn't great"
>>62762101
I stated an opinion, all you did was shitpost.
>>62762191
your opinion = shit so technically you shitposted too
>>62762249
Epic dude, why not try contributing with actual discussion though? You probably have a counter point, right?
Let's hear some directors you like.
This VIllenmeme /pol/faggot is at it again. Poor guy has no shame.
dont waste your time
>>62762478
that first sentence gave me cancer
have you even attempted to read what you said and figure out what it means?
>>62761001
what site is this, and will it be only for movies or tv too?
>>62761972
Well rotten tomatoes sure gets a lot of traction off a simple like/dislike, as did Ebert. The point is ratings are arbitrary compared to articulated thoughts. That's where most of the debate should take place, not between a 7 or an 8. That difference is different for everybody.
Plus half stars require me to put more math in the code and math is hard.
>>62763022
The solution: no half stars (they're autistic), and allow comments on logged ratings that don't have a review coupled with them
>>62762942
I'm making it as a hobby, mainly for myself.
No tv yet. Adding it wouldn't be hard, but it would take up a lot more resources and divert my attention, so for now im just concentrating on movies.
>>62763022
>Well rotten tomatoes sure gets a lot of traction off a simple like/dislike, as did Ebert.
i dont follow. rottentomatoes is out 100 and eert uses half stars
>The point is ratings are arbitrary compared to articulated thoughts. That's where most of the debate should take place
of course. any rating system is arbitrary , the point is to choose which arbitrary rating system suits best.
>>62763151
why the fuck did LB ever remove that again
>>62763263
I meant the aggregated critic reviews. They flatten every rating into a like/dislike in order to efficiently convey whether a film is recommendable or not. A 5 scale rating refines that without going too overboard. I mean if you're rating out of 10, why not 100, like pitchfork or metacritic. At some point you have to settle for an arbitrary approximation of your feelings and save the rest for prose.
>>62763151
I'm fine with allowing comments on logged but not reviewed films as long as they allow you to delete shit.
I don't want to have to deal with autistic faggots spamming memes or asking inane questions and shit.
>>62763286
What were the benefits of that feature to begin with?
LW, come back to the IRC.
Let's watch Everything Goes Wrong.
>>62764211
Because sometimes I don't want to write a review for everything but I would welcome discussion / questions about why I rated something the way I did
>>62763771
>At some point you have to settle for an arbitrary approximation of your feelings and save the rest for prose.
i know bruh, its all arbitrary, i know. but you ahvent argued for why 5 specifically is beter than 10.
my argument for 10 ratings is that offers a more accurate overview for the movie. when i see 10/10 i think unmissable, cream of the crop, but when i see 5/5 i think "that couldve been a 4.5/5 just forced into a 5/5" and am less sure if it matches what im looking for.
for this reason i actually find that 5 stars makes me WANT to read the reviews more to get a clearer intrepretation, but when youre scouring through hundreds of reviews and ratings shit gets overwhelimg and ultimately defeating, coz you cant read em all.
>>62764211
just helped open conversation. if you saw someone give an interesting rating you can comment, maybe start a dialogue. why does the person need to write a review for that to happen? dumb change thing to take out
>>62760955
>30 mins into Out 1 and Chill, and he gives you this look
>>62762675
Please get some taste before posting, thanks :)
>>62751160
katie h. is nice to me she liked TWO of my reviews
>>62766116
>>62766067
*330
>>62762675
based jojo
>>62761001
pal how did you make this site? i want to make something like this, for personal use. how much time would you say it would take if im starting from zero, only having some html/css knowledge? real shame how there seems to be no clear path for how to proceed with this, while if you want to make a blog you just install wordpress...
http://letterboxd.com/thegr1fter/
I'm here.
>>62767126
Some queermo on #lbxd told me to ask you for horror movie reccs since I'd seen everything he was recommending.
>>62761001
make it possible to import our exported letterboxd data.
>>62767186
What subgenre you looking for?
>>62767390
>mfw I replied to myself instead of you
"Idk maybe body"
>>62767503
There's the obvious ones like Cronenberg and Tetsuo's, but some I like:
Meatball Machine
Splinter
The Beast Within
Thanatomorphose
American Mary and Starry Eyes are both liked by the horror community, but I didn't like them personally.
A lot zombie movies somewhat fit into the genre.
Also, you'd probably like all the melt movies then too like Street Trash/ Slime City/ Body Melt.
Body horror is pretty small in general.
>>62767665
to
>>62767523
I just did the same mistake LOL.
>>62767700
I want something like excision/may/
What are some kinos about bumps?
>Steve Jobs is an incredible film and I'm not just saying that because I own a MacBook Pro and an iPhone 6+.
based Evan
fucking jkackieray u pigfuck why don tu write write reviews >/Ddd
>>62767126
you have the plebbest taste i've ever seen on lb so far, great job
Does /tv/ have an essential sand-core list?
If not, I'd like to make one. Taking recs itt.
Starting with Woman in the Dunes, of course.
Oh, and Lawrence of Arabia.
>>62769822
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls004453539/
>>62769846
Welp.
>>62769854
plus every western i guess
also Dune maybe tho i haven't seen it so i can't judge
>>62769874
I want to limit it to the cream of the crop - 5 films maximum, if I can get away with it.
Attack of the Clones
>>62748010
>rateyourmusic
>rating movies
>>62769980
>rating art
>>62770022
jackie pls
>site is called rate your music
>ive never even made music
:/
>>62769980
>>62770432
>>62770449
>squeezing from the top
SPOILER THAT SHIT PLS OR AT LEAST PUT A FUCKING TRIGGER WARNING ON IT UFCK
http://letterboxd.com/aboo612/
See any good films lately?
>>62771224
follow anybody good lately?
>>62771466
No, I haven't had a single person follow me who
1. Has decent taste in my eyes
2. Reviews every film he watches
3. Has a reviewing style I don't consider annoying
Call me whatever, the point is, whats the point of friending someone if you don't get good recs from them?
>>62769822
>>62771635
oh the ironing
>>62771635
man you are a real piece of shit
>boring taste, yet demands for others to be super interesting
>doesn't follow anyone because he is too cool for school
>wants people to, forcefully, review every movie they watch
>only befriends people to get something out of them
>hasn't even logged all movies he has watched
end your internet existence now ok
How do i write 'good ' reviews on lb, to earn followers?
>>62771635
not trying to be rude, but you're part of the problem then
>>62773194
just write memes that's how to get followers
>>62773194
>>62773255
This guy speaks truth.
Look at the biggest faggots on LB and look at their faggot reviews and you will see that they indeed do have the most likes.
This faggot is a prime example of the faggotry that abounds;
>http://letterboxd.com/evanredwings/
>>62772567
No :^)
>>62773419
>Interstellar
>Oh. My. God. I have a headache, but it's the best headache I've ever had.
>513 likes
>>62773419
holy shit i'd rather not
thanks tho
>>62773510
Then just be honest and write what you want.
It comes down to why you want to write reviews and what you want to empart.
>>62773464
>Holy Shit. Holy Shit. Holy Shit. Fincher, you magnificent bastard! This was my first Fincher film I've seen at the theater and boy was in one hell of an experience.
>>62773537
>>62774716
he's a big guy
>>62774775
i concur
tfw leave laptop on overnight to dl stuff but you put it somewhere almost out of range of wifi so you get bad speeds
