[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Is there a time period which has films you really do not care
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 1
File: 1413140059399.jpg (202 KB, 600x1000) Image search: [Google]
1413140059399.jpg
202 KB, 600x1000
Is there a time period which has films you really do not care for?

> 90s movie
> Warm colors
> Bland, tv-esque visuals, awful CGI
> Technobabble
>>
>>62731417
10s
>>
>>62731417
>Warm colors
Can you give an example?
>>
>>62731467
Good will hunting for example
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaZVjZEFkRs

A prominence of orange/light brown/lavender tones. It's a latter half of 90s thing really, but it looks so cheap.
>>
> 70s
> It ain't me
> Every movie has an embarrassing sociological view or message
> All the American cities at the time looked like a dump in a completely meh way
>>
>>62731546
I'm not really seeing it there.
>>
>>62731589
Look at 0:50. Skin doesn't look like that.
>>
>>62731546

Yeah you don't know what you're talking about. You must be blind
>>
>>62731642
Neither does it look like in any other stylistic color palette?
>>
>>62731673
Well, yeah, but the overtly warm colour palette of 90s films is what bugs me. It looks cheap.
>>
>>62731700
so does your mother
>>
>>62731700
>It looks cheap.
The problem is with you then, because you somehow associate warm colors with cheapness.
>>
>>62731417
uh idk I like some movies from pretty much every year
>>
>>62731467
se7en
>>
>>62731546
>>62731417
I know exactly what you're talking about but calling this a product of "the 90's" is stupid. It was perhaps a group of studios in the 90's.
>>
I don't like today's edgy grimdark overly serious nature of films.
>>
>late 60's early/mid 70's
>everything is ugly even the good films
>sound quality is even worse than the 50's for some reason
Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 1

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.