[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Will YouTubers ever be taken seriously as filmmakers?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /tv/ - Television & Film

Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 3
File: Not_cool.jpg (21 KB, 214x317) Image search: [Google]
Not_cool.jpg
21 KB, 214x317
Will YouTubers ever be taken seriously as filmmakers?
>>
>>61784941
nope. never.
>>
>>61784941
Who?
>>
Go to Vimeo if you want to find the truly best filmmakers making serious and good films
>>
File: Brendan Frasier Turnt.jpg (8 KB, 183x182) Image search: [Google]
Brendan Frasier Turnt.jpg
8 KB, 183x182
>>61784941
>Not liking YouTube Movies
I truly enjoy the new media, they are much better than movies now and days. These guys actually put time into there work.
>>
No. They're all cash grabs.
>>
When they learn the value of adequate lighting, meaningful cinematography, decent recording equipment and a good screenplay.

But at that point they will actually be making films so whatever.
>>
>>61784941
Some. Certainly not vloggers and let's players.
>>
I remember in the earlier days of Youtube there was this zombie comedy show I used to watch on there. It was fun and good. I don't really do the youtube but you don't really hear about stuff like that being made any more, it all just seems to be "attractive person talks at the camera about gender issues with smashcuts and shitty comedy bits for no reason".
>>
>>61785137
>Some
who?
>>
>>61785146
Yeah, sounds about right. And now they're all writing shitty books for some reason.
>>
>>61785146
>"attractive person talks at the camera about gender issues with smashcuts and shitty comedy bits for no reason"

This is true, and it fucking sucks. It's easier to get recognition on YouTube, but people actually make shit on Vimeo, like >>61785025 said.
>>
File: 1444813561952.jpg (76 KB, 315x450) Image search: [Google]
1444813561952.jpg
76 KB, 315x450
>>61784941

>Tfw wasted so much time making comedy skits during college instead of pulling the resources together to make a feature project.
Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 3

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.