What is an appropriate amount of time to spend in a city? Rome in a day is garbage. I think 1 - 2 weeks than move on to another
Depends totally on the city, what you are into, how much time you have total and what all else you want to get to that trip.
Me, Id love to spend a week or two in Rome -- I've been there only once, and it was for three days, which was great but there was much more I would have wanted to do with more time. Still, my time in Rome was one of my favorite travel memories.
long stays in one city are way over rated from a opportunity cost prospective.
I did 3 days in Rome and thought that was more than enough. If you're going for 1-2 weeks, jump on a train and go around places.
>>1134308
stay there for a month, travel like its 1850
a full week in rome was nice, OTOH i did equally thorough touristing with 8 days between rotterdam, antwerp, ghent, kortrijk and munich (3 days in munich, at that)
obviously only munich even approaches rome tier, but i also lost 2 days on _shitty_ train trips after the brussels airport blew fucking up
>>1134720
kortrijk haha go bruges you twat
>>1134673
>I did 3 days in Rome and thought that was more than enough.
fucking pleb
